Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2005gen-apr - Cronologia

Christian: slashdot.org, 19 aprile 2005

2009-03-11T02:19:32Z

slashdot.org, 19 aprile 2005

Christian: ha spostato Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2005 a Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2005gen-apr

2009-03-09T22:17:43Z

ha spostato Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2005 a Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2005gen-apr

Christian: più spazio

2009-03-09T22:17:27Z

più spazio

Mostra modifiche

Christian: /* 2005 November */ :USA Today, November 29, 2005

2009-03-09T13:44:23Z

‎2005 November: :USA Today, November 29, 2005

Christian: /* 2005 January */ :Technology Review (del)

2009-03-09T07:22:34Z

‎2005 January: :Technology Review (del)

Christian: /* 2005 March */ :Wired, 2 marzo 2005

2009-03-09T06:18:01Z

‎2005 March: :Wired, 2 marzo 2005

Christian: /* 2005 April */ :slashdot.org, 18 aprile 2005

2009-03-08T02:45:50Z

‎2005 April: :slashdot.org, 18 aprile 2005

Christian: /* 2005 February */ :agg.

2009-02-26T03:49:27Z

‎2005 February: :agg.

Christian: /* Edit War su Perverted-Justice.com */ :corr.

2009-02-25T01:55:22Z

‎Edit War su Perverted-Justice.com: :corr.

Christian: /* 2005 January */ :+

2009-02-25T01:54:18Z

‎2005 January: :+

@@ Riga 370: / Riga 370: @@
 === slashdot.org, 18 aprile 2005 ===
-  [http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213 The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir], slashdot.org, 18 aprile 2005
+  {{cite news
 *"Web quickly spreads word of new pope". Reuters. April 19, 2005. <small>[http://news.com.com/Web+quickly+spreads+word+of+new+pope/2100-1028_3-5676551.html]</small>

@@ Riga 711: / Riga 711: @@
 * Komarova, Anastasia. "Зрители снимаются с мест" - [[Novaya Gazeta]], [[November 21]], 2005, page 21. The article tells that nowadays people abandon TV because they want to control the information they receive. The examples include [[TiVo]] and [[LiveJournal]] as well as Wikipedia as ''"the most popular free-of-charge online encyclopedia, one of the 50 most visited websites in the world"'' ([http://2005.novayagazeta.ru/nomer/2005/87n/n87n-s36.shtml source]).
-* [[John Seigenthaler Sr.]]. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm A false Wikipedia 'biography'] ''[[USA Today]]'' [[November 29]], [[2005]]. An opinion piece written to document how an anonymous Wikipedia contributor accused Seigenthaler of possibly killing [[John F. Kennedy|John]] and/or [[Robert F. Kennedy]], a claim which remained on Seigenthaler's Wikipedia biography for three months. Seigenthaler complains that no one is held accountable for libel on the internet in general by the law or U.S. Congress.
+===USA Today, November 29, 2005===
 * [http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5975227.html Web tool puts new face on Wikipedia] [[CNET]] [[November 29]], [[2005]]. Discusses a tool called Gollum, created by Harald Hanek.

@@ Riga 5: / Riga 5: @@
 {{TOCright}}
 ==2005 January==
 *Klemm, Aaron E. "Motivation and value of free resources:  Wikipedia and PlanetMath show the way". ''Free Software Magazine''.  January 1, 2005<small>[http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_01/wiki_value/]</small>
 ::"Wikipedia is blurring the lines of production with astounding success."

@@ Riga 241: / Riga 241: @@
 *:"The team running Wikipedia has urged the open source development community to lend their support to help the encyclopaedia project grow and to combat Web bots that are damaging its content.
 *:"In the opening talk at the FOSDEM conference in Brussels on Saturday, Wikipedia Foundation president Jimmy Wales urged the assembled audience of open source developers to get involved with the online encyclopaedia. He said Wikipedia has the physical resources to handle the extra traffic, but needs technical people to manage these servers."
-*Pink, Daniel. "The Book Stops Here." ''[[Wired magazine|Wired]]''. March 2, 2005.  Pink, Daniel. "The Book Stops Here". Pages: Cover - "Wikipedia: the self-organizing library of the future", 007, 124-129, 136, 139. <small>[http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.03/wiki.html?tw=wn_tophead_4]</small>
 *:This in-depth commentary is Wired magazine's [[/An encyclopedia that is alive|first print article on Wikipedia]].  Pink attended the [[Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC1|December meetup in New York]] as part of his research.
 *Del Arte, Alonso. "Fusion: Although current, Wikipepedia ''[sic]'' not always reliable source of information." ''[[The South End]]''. March 2, 2005. <small>[http://www.southend.wayne.edu/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1053]</small>
 *:Surveys the views of Wikipedia by various professors who lecture at [[Wayne State University]]. The same issues as normal are raised: Some think it's OK to use for undergraduates, definitely not for postgraduate work, lack of proper academic peer review mechanisms issues of unbalanced and patchy content, questions the priorities of Wikipedia authors. Quotes from article:

@@ Riga 352: / Riga 352: @@
 *Cara, Anna. "If 'Wikipedians' don't like this article, they'll change it" ''Atlanta Journal-Constitution''.  April 17, 2005.
 *:"In an interview with Wikipedia's latest newsletter, Stanford University professor Lawrence Lessig simply says, 'Wikipedia is jazz.'"
 *"Web quickly spreads word of new pope". Reuters. April 19, 2005. <small>[http://news.com.com/Web+quickly+spreads+word+of+new+pope/2100-1028_3-5676551.html]</small>

← Versione meno recente	Versione delle 22:17, 9 mar 2009
(Nessuna differenza)

@@ Riga 137: / Riga 137: @@
 *:"The ferocity of these W.C. warriors, and the furious indigestive indignation with which they defend their ideas, is absolutely astounding. I've never seen such vitriol in such a trivial context -- except, perhaps, on the Internet, where similarly forgettable forums are littered with self-righteous diatribes and counter-diatribes, each thread taken mortally seriously by all of four people. (If you doubt it, consider that my column poking fun at Wikipedia geeks earned several angry, ten-page rebuttals from Wikipedia faithful -- or, as they are technically known, "Wikipedophiles.")"
-* "Google lends Wikipedia a hand".''p2pnet.net''. <small>[http://p2pnet.net/story/3867]</small>
+ "Google lends Wikipedia a hand".''p2pnet.net''. <small>[http://p2pnet.net/story/3867]</small>
 *:"...Microsoft ... loosed its own search engine ... Both Google and Yahoo are streets ahead of MSN launch in terms of both popularity and goodwill. ... Google has offered its support to assist Wikipedia by providing much needed storage and hosting services, says TechWhack, going on, &#8220;The deal is still in very early stages. Wikipedia has made it public that Google has not asked for any favors in returns, which includes any ad placement on Wikipedia pages. ... Google with the power and content of Wikipedia might make a lethal combination to empower the extent; knowledge is available to the end user on the Internet. But then considering Wikipedia already is open source, Google would not have needed any tech support from the developers of this online encyclopedia!&#8221;"
@@ Riga 143: / Riga 143: @@
 *:"Google.com, not missing a beat, looks like it is making plans to start using the Wiki Media online Encyclopedia project in its search results. Google has agreed to host some of the Company's wesite using Google Servers."
-* "Google may host encyclopedia project" (February 11, 2005). ''Cnet News.com'' <small>[http://news.com.com/Google%20may%20host%20encyclopedia%20project/2100-1038_3-5572744.html?tag=html.alert]</small>
+ "Google may host encyclopedia project" (February 11, 2005). ''Cnet News.com'' <small>[http://news.com.com/Google%20may%20host%20encyclopedia%20project/2100-1038_3-5572744.html?tag=html.alert]</small>
 *:"Wiki Media Foundation, the group behind the Wikipedia online encyclopedia project, said Friday that search giant Google has volunteered to host some of its content on company servers."
-* "Google Offers to Host Wikipedia" (February 11, 2005). ''BetaNews'' <small>[http://www.betanews.com/article/Google_Offers_to_Host_Wikipedia/1108144572]</small>
+ "Google Offers to Host Wikipedia" (February 11, 2005). ''BetaNews'' <small>[http://www.betanews.com/article/Google_Offers_to_Host_Wikipedia/1108144572]</small>
 *:"From Internet domains to Web browsers, Google seems to have its hands all over the Web these days. But the search giant shows no signs of slowing its reach, and has offered to host the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Wiki Media Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, says [[m:Google hosting|Google has volunteered]] to supply servers and bandwidth to the project."
-* Krevs, Paul (February 11, 2005). "Google Offers Assistance To Wikipedia". ''Neowin.net''. <small>[http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=27044&category=main]</small>
+ Krevs, Paul (February 11, 2005). "Google Offers Assistance To Wikipedia". ''Neowin.net''. <small>[http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=27044&category=main]</small>
 *:"Google has offered to assist online encyclopedia Wikipedia, by providing some much needed storage and hosting services to the giant non-profit site. Although terms of the upcoming arrangement have yet to be finalized, Wikimedia commented that any deal will still see Wikipedia remaining ad-free; meaning that the arrangement will not impose Google "AdSense" technology on the popular site."
-* "GooglePedia? Google Wants to Help the Wikipedia". ''Search Engine Watch''. <small>[http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050210-220108]</small>
+ "GooglePedia? Google Wants to Help the Wikipedia". ''Search Engine Watch''. <small>[http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050210-220108]</small>
 *:"A post at Dirson kicked off a Slashdot discussion about Google offering to host "some" Wikimedia content. What this precisely means is not spelled out. A post on the Wikimedia wiki says that "terms" of the offer are being discussed and that a private IRC meeting is scheduled for March. It also mentions that Google's offer "does not mean" there will be a requirement to include advertising on Wikimedia sites. Stay tuned."

@@ Riga 77: / Riga 77: @@
 ===Edit War su Perverted-Justice.com===
-* "Wikipedia Battle over Controversial Web Site Entry Ended". ''ChatMag''. January 29, 2005. <small>[http://www.chatmag.com/news/012905_wiki_battle.html]</small>
+ "Wikipedia Battle over Controversial Web Site Entry Ended". ''ChatMag''. January 29, 2005. <small>[http://www.chatmag.com/news/012905_wiki_battle.html]</small>
-::Details a controversy at [[Perverted-Justice.com]].
+::Details a controversy at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverted_Justice Perverted-Justice.com].
 *Cone, Edward. "Making inside of newsroom as big as outside". ''Greensboro News & Record''. January 30, 2005. <small>[http://www.news-record.com/news/columnists/staff/h3cone_013005.htm]</small>

@@ Riga 11: / Riga 11: @@
 *Rupley, Sebastian. "Wikis at Work." ''PC Magazine''. January 3, 2005. <small>[http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,2533,a=141231,00.asp]</small>
 ::"One of the more robust wikis is at www.wikipedia.com, which bills itself as "the free encyclopedia." It is a multilingual, open-content encyclopedia that anyone can edit."
   Till, Francis. "Tsunami blogging: The curl in the wave, first hand." ''National Business Review''. January 4, 2005. <small>[http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1747640,00.asp]</small>
 ::"You can get a really good consensus picture of what's going on that's stronger than any one news organization could offer," Jimmy Wales, founder of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, told ''Silicon Valley''. "So many people are on the ground in different places. And people pick up very quickly which are the bloggers to read, and they bring that information to the forefront and amplify it."
@@ Riga 29: / Riga 31: @@
 ::Writing about the current debate about Wikipedia Naughton opines: "five years from now, when the Wikipedia is essential infrastructure, we'll hardly remember what the fuss was about."
   Terdiman, Daniel. "Wikipedia Faces Growing Pains" ''Wired News''. January 10, 2005. <small>[http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,66210,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2]</small>
 ::On the tension between academic credibility and collaboration, and concludes with, "The question, then, is what people should expect of Wikipedia. As it grows and becomes a repository of 2 million entries from more and more contributors, more of whom are experts in their fields, it probably will be seen as on par with the Britannicas of the world. But first it must convince those experts to become involved, and that will likely mean finding a way to make them feel welcome.."
-*Corkery, Paul. "Wikipedia reinvents information searching." ''The Triangle''. January 14, 2005.<small>[http://www.thetriangle.org/news/2005/01/14/SciTech/Wikipedia.Reinvents.Information.Searching-833083.shtml]</small>
+===''The Triangle''. January 14, 2005===
 ::Regardless of its risk of inaccuracy, Wikipedia exists as a noteworthy experiment relating to the idea of Internet users to come together in the spirit of knowledge and learning. What had the potential to become a public toilet of misinformation exists instead as one of the most successful examples of a human oriented, self policing collaborative education effort.
@@ Riga 72: / Riga 76: @@
 ::"There are some downsides to Answers.com. It has answers for only about a million available topics so far. And it relies heavily on Wikipedia, which has been criticized because it isn't written or edited by experts. But unlike some recognized sources like the online Encyclopedia Britannica, Answers.com is free and instantly searches multiple reference works from multiple publishers."
 * "Wikipedia Battle over Controversial Web Site Entry Ended". ''ChatMag''. January 29, 2005. <small>[http://www.chatmag.com/news/012905_wiki_battle.html]</small>
 ::Details a controversy at [[Perverted-Justice.com]].