Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2006mag-ago - Cronologia

Christian: CNET, 1 agosto 2006

2009-03-11T02:43:28Z

CNET, 1 agosto 2006

Christian: Atlantic Monthly], 24 agosto 2006

2009-03-09T15:16:12Z

Atlantic Monthly], 24 agosto 2006</del>

Christian: /* Marshall Poe, A Closer Look at the Neutral Point of View */ :commento Andrea

2009-03-09T15:08:40Z

‎Marshall Poe, A Closer Look at the Neutral Point of View: :commento Andrea

Christian: /* 2006 August */ : Marshall Poe, Atlantic Unbound, agosto 2006 + Marshall Poe, A Closer Look at the Neutral Point of View

2009-03-09T15:08:03Z

‎2006 August: : Marshall Poe, Atlantic Unbound, agosto 2006 + Marshall Poe, A Closer Look at the Neutral Point of View

Christian: /* 2006 July */ :Colbert Nation, 31 luglio 2006

2009-03-09T14:45:49Z

‎2006 July: :Colbert Nation, 31 luglio 2006

Christian: /* The New Yorker, 31 luglio 2006 */ :agg.

2009-03-09T05:35:19Z

‎The New Yorker, 31 luglio 2006: :agg.

Mostra modifiche

Christian: The New Yorker, 31 luglio 2006

2009-03-09T04:35:59Z

The New Yorker, 31 luglio 2006

Christian: fonti spostate

2009-03-08T16:57:14Z

fonti spostate

Mostra modifiche

← Versione meno recente		Versione delle 02:43, 11 mar 2009
Riga 470:		Riga 470:

	{{Citazione\|When I started working on this article, the early Wikipedia listserves were a great resource. That’s one of the beauties of the Web. You can’t really hide. Once it’s out there, it never disappears. Similarly with the page records of Wikipedia entries. I was able to go back and find what was, from a historian’s point of view, a remarkably complete record of what had been done.\|--[[User:Andrea\|Andrea]] ([[User talk:Andrea\|discussione]]) 17:50, 20 feb 2009 (CET)\|<ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200608u/poe-interview/</ref>}}		{{Citazione\|When I started working on this article, the early Wikipedia listserves were a great resource. That’s one of the beauties of the Web. You can’t really hide. Once it’s out there, it never disappears. Similarly with the page records of Wikipedia entries. I was able to go back and find what was, from a historian’s point of view, a remarkably complete record of what had been done.\|--[[User:Andrea\|Andrea]] ([[User talk:Andrea\|discussione]]) 17:50, 20 feb 2009 (CET)\|<ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200608u/poe-interview/</ref>}}
		+
		+	===CNET, 1 agosto 2006===
		+	CNET, [http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6100754-7.html?tag=mncol%3btxt Colbert speaks, America follows: All hail Wikiality!], August 1, 2006, Caroline McCarthy

	===Marshall Poe, A Closer Look at the Neutral Point of View===		===Marshall Poe, A Closer Look at the Neutral Point of View===

@@ Riga 522: / Riga 522: @@
 :"Wikipedia, for instance, gives its editors points for making edits to entries.  But one result of that is said to be editors making potentially unnecessary minor changes to articles to drive their ratings."
 ::Sent to the Comm. Com as an error - We ''don't'' give editors "points"!
 *{{cite news |date=2006-08-25 |accessdate=2006-08-25 |url=http://www.rismedia.com/index.php/article/articleview/15717/1/1/ |title='Wiki Wars' Rage in Political Arena |publisher=McClatchy-Tribune Business News |author=Beth Bresnahan }} Reprinted in ''[[The Age]]'' as [http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/politics-fuels-a-wiki-war-of-words/2006/08/28/1156617259368.html Wiki wars rage in US political arena], [[28 August]] [[2006]].

@@ Riga 474: / Riga 474: @@
   Marshall Poe, [http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609/wikipedia-sidebar A Closer Look at the Neutral Point of View (NPOV)], August 1, 2006
 :Interessante analisi del NPOV attraverso l'esempio della voce "Abortion". --[[User:Christian|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian|discussione]]) 18:31, 15 feb 2009 (CET)
 *{{cite news|title=Citizen encyclopedism|publisher=[[Telegraph of Nashua]]|date=[[August 2]], [[2006]]|url=http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060802/COLUMNISTS03/108020154}}

@@ Riga 439: / Riga 439: @@
 ==2006 August==
-*{{cite news|title=Common Knowledge|publisher=[[The Atlantic Monthly|Atlantic Unbound]]|date=[[August]] 2006|url=http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200608u/poe-interview/}}
+===Marshall Poe, Atlantic Unbound, agosto 2006===
 :Author [[Marshall Poe]] answers interview questions from [[Jennie Rothenberg]] of the Atlantic about his impressions of Wikipedia and sources for his September article entitled The Hive.
@@ Riga 469: / Riga 470: @@
 {{Citazione|When I started working on this article, the early Wikipedia listserves were a great resource. That’s one of the beauties of the Web. You can’t really hide. Once it’s out there, it never disappears. Similarly with the page records of Wikipedia entries. I was able to go back and find what was, from a historian’s point of view, a remarkably complete record of what had been done.|--[[User:Andrea|Andrea]] ([[User talk:Andrea|discussione]]) 17:50, 20 feb 2009 (CET)|<ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200608u/poe-interview/</ref>}}
 *{{cite news|title=Citizen encyclopedism|publisher=[[Telegraph of Nashua]]|date=[[August 2]], [[2006]]|url=http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060802/COLUMNISTS03/108020154}}

@@ Riga 433: / Riga 433: @@
 |accessdate=2007-03-25
 |quote=}}</ref>}}
 ==2006 August==

← Versione meno recente		Versione delle 04:35, 9 mar 2009
Riga 200:		Riga 200:

	*[[CTV]] News and the [[Canadian Press]] both cite a Wikipedia article as "arguably a better gauge of how the race is going" then any other information available. [http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060727/liberal_race_060730/20060730/]		*[[CTV]] News and the [[Canadian Press]] both cite a Wikipedia article as "arguably a better gauge of how the race is going" then any other information available. [http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060727/liberal_race_060730/20060730/]
		+
		+	===The New Yorker, 31 luglio 2006===
		+	{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}
		+	:Molto bello. Oltre le citazioni, l'articolo è interessante per il lungo elenco di voci curiose contenute un WP inglese. --[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)
		+	{{Citazione\|The site has achieved this prominence largely without paid staff or revenue. It has five employees in addition to Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia’s thirty-nine-year-old founder, and it carries no advertising.\|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+
		+	{{Citazione\|Wales is at the forefront of a revolution in knowledge gathering: he has marshalled an army of volunteers who believe that, working collaboratively, they can produce an encyclopedia that is as good as any written by experts, and with an unprecedented range.\|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+	:WP può essere visto come un altro esempio di prodotto prosumer. Non esiste più, almeno potenzialmente, una distinzione netta fra autore e lettore. Inoltre non esiste una "superiorità" basata sulla reputazione dell'autore. Chiunque, democraticamente, può guadagnare "autorità" (nell'accezione di Gadamer) facendo. --[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	{{Citazione\|Senators and congressmen have been caught tampering with their entries; the entire House of Representatives has been banned from Wikipedia several times.\|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+
		+	{{Citazione\|Curiously, though, mob rule has not led to chaos. Wikipedia, which began as an experiment in unfettered democracy, has sprouted policies and procedures. At the same time, the site embodies our newly casual relationship to truth. When confronted with evidence of errors or bias, Wikipedians invoke a favorite excuse: look how often the mainstream media, and the traditional encyclopedia, are wrong! As defenses go, this is the epistemological equivalent of “But Johnny jumped off the bridge first.” Wikipedia, though, is only five years old. One day, it may grow up.\|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+
		+	{{Citazione\|It took a devious Frenchman, Pierre Bayle, to conceive of an encyclopedia composed solely of errors. After the idea failed to generate much enthusiasm among potential readers, he instead compiled a “Dictionnaire Historique et Critique,” which consisted almost entirely of footnotes, many highlighting flaws of earlier scholarship. Bayle taught readers to doubt, a lesson in subversion that Diderot and d’Alembert, the authors of the Encyclopédie (1751-80), learned well. Their thirty-five-volume work preached rationalism at the expense of church and state. The more stolid Britannica was born of cross-channel rivalry and an Anglo-Saxon passion for utility.\|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+
		+	{{Citazione\|Wales’s first encyclopedia was the World Book, which his parents acquired after dinner one evening in 1969, from a door-to-door salesman. Wales—who resembles a young Billy Crystal with the neuroses neatly tucked in—recalls the enchantment of pasting in update stickers that cross-referenced older entries to the annual supplements.\|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+
		+	{{Citazione\|As an undergraduate, he had read Friedrich Hayek’s 1945 free-market manifesto, “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” which argues that a person’s knowledge is by definition partial, and that truth is established only when people pool their wisdom. Wales thought of the essay again in the nineteen-nineties, when he began reading about the open-source movement, a group of programmers who believed that software should be free and distributed in such a way that anyone could modify the code. He was particularly impressed by “The Cathedral and the Bazaar,” an essay, later expanded into a book, by Eric Raymond, one of the movement’s founders. “It opened my eyes to the possibility of mass collaboration,” Wales said.
		+
		+	The first step was a misstep. In 2000, Wales hired Larry Sanger, a graduate student in philosophy he had met on a Listserv, to help him create an online general-interest encyclopedia called Nupedia. The idea was to solicit articles from scholars, subject the articles to a seven-step review process, and post them free online. Wales himself tried to compose the entry on Robert Merton and options-pricing theory; after he had written a few sentences, he remembered why he had dropped out of graduate school. “They were going to take my essay and send it to two finance professors in the field,” he recalled. “I had been out of academia for several years. It was intimidating; it felt like homework.”
		+
		+	After a year, Nupedia had only twenty-one articles, on such topics as atonality and Herodotus. In January, 2001, Sanger had dinner with a friend, who told him about the wiki, a simple software tool that allows for collaborative writing and editing. Sanger thought that a wiki might attract new contributors to Nupedia. [...] Sanger coined the term Wikipedia, and the site went live on January 15, 2001. Two days later, he sent an e-mail to the Nupedia mailing list—about two thousand people. “Wikipedia is up!” he wrote. “Humor me. Go there and add a little article. It will take all of five or ten minutes.”
		+
		+	Wales braced himself for “complete rubbish.” He figured that if he and Sanger were lucky the wiki would generate a few rough drafts for Nupedia. Within a month, Wikipedia had six hundred articles. After a year, there were twenty thousand. \|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+
		+	{{Citazione\|Wales is fond of citing a 1962 proclamation by Charles Van Doren, who later became an editor at Britannica. Van Doren believed that the traditional encyclopedia was defunct. It had grown by accretion rather than by design; it had sacrificed artful synthesis to plodding convention; it looked backward. “Because the world is radically new, the ideal encyclopedia should be radical, too,” Van Doren wrote. “It should stop being safe—in politics, in philosophy, in science.”\|--[[User:Christian\|Christian]] ([[User talk:Christian\|discussione]]) 05:35, 9 mar 2009 (CET)\|<ref>{{cite news
		+	\|first=Stacy
		+	\|last=Schiff
		+	\|title=Know It All
		+	\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact
		+	\|work=Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?
		+	\|publisher=[[The New Yorker]]
		+	\|date=July 31, 2006
		+	\|accessdate=2007-03-25
		+	\|quote=}}</ref>}}
		+

	==2006 August==		==2006 August==