Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2008gen-apr - Cronologia

Christian: ha spostato Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2008 a Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2008gen-apr

2009-03-09T18:19:44Z

ha spostato Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2008 a Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2008gen-apr

Christian: più spazio

2009-03-09T18:19:22Z

più spazio

Mostra modifiche

Christian: /* June */ :del

2009-03-09T17:43:43Z

‎June: :del

Christian: /* December */ :Master New Media, 1 dicembre 2008

2009-03-09T14:47:57Z

‎December: :Master New Media, 1 dicembre 2008

Christian: /* 2008 */ :titoli

2009-03-09T13:35:37Z

‎2008: :titoli

Christian: /* January */ :Wired

2009-03-09T13:34:23Z

‎January: :Wired <del>

Christian: /* March */ :evidenziato

2009-03-09T10:22:01Z

‎March: :evidenziato

Andrea: /* February */

2009-02-20T15:52:29Z

‎February

Andrea: /* February */

2009-02-20T15:42:43Z

‎February

Andrea: /* February */

2009-02-20T15:31:47Z

‎February

@@ Riga 1 299: / Riga 1 299: @@
 *Discussion about what is cosmetic and what is drug. Judges of [[Supreme Court of India]] cited Wikipedia as source in their judgment. {{cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/common/news_article.php?tab=r&autono=324214&subLeft=2&leftnm=4|title=M J Antony: Begging the question|date=May 28, 2008|work=M J Antony|publisher=www.business-standard.com|accessdate=2008-06-18}}
-=== June ===
+==2008 June ==
 *{{cite news
 |first=Andrew
@@ Riga 1 318: / Riga 1 318: @@
 |quote=Wikipedia – with its 10 million articles in 253 languages created by hundreds of thousands of contributors – is the architectural and pedagogical antithesis of Balliol College. }}
 *:Reports a debate at Oxford University, Balliol College,  between Wikipedia co-founder Dr Larry Sanger and Andrew Keen on the proposition that "the internet is the future of knowledge".
 *{{cite news

@@ Riga 2 149: / Riga 2 149: @@
 ::This story was also covered in {{cite news |first=Jon |last=Hoeksma |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=Wikipedia can omit key drug information |url=http://www.ehealtheurope.net/news/4376/wikipedia_can_omit_key_drug_information |work=E-Health Europe |publisher= |date=2008-12-03 |accessdate=2008-12-03 }} The stories are based on a paper {{cite journal |last=Clauson |first=Kevin A |authorlink= |coauthors=Hyla H Polen, Maged N Kamel Boulos & Joan H Dzenowagis |year= |month= |title=Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Wikipedia |journal=The Annals of Pharmacotherapy |volume=42 |issue=12 |pages=1814-1821 |id=DOI 10.1345/aph.1L474 |url=http://www.theannals.com/cgi/content/full/42/12/1814 |accessdate=2008-12-03 |quote= }} which says "No factual errors were found in Wikipedia, whereas 4 answers in Medscape conflicted with the answer key; errors of omission were higher in Wikipedia than in MDR. There was a marked improvement in Wikipedia over time, as current entries were superior to those 90 days prior." I challenged Kevin Clauson, the lead author, when he presented interim results of this study at the Medicine 2.0 conference, about why he & his team hadn't corrected the errors and omissions they had detected - he said he was going to take that question back to the regulatory professional bodies.
-===December===
+==2008 December==
 *{{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=Wikipedia hopes to make editing user-friendly (AP) |url=http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20081203/ap_on_hi_te/tec_tech_bit_wikipedia_editing |work= |publisher=Associated Press; Yahoo! Tech |date=2008-12-03 |accessdate=2008-12-05 }}
 :''"Concerned that many would-be contributors to Wikipedia are being scared away, the foundation that runs the Internet encyclopedia is getting an $890,000 grant to try to make the editing process more user-friendly."''

@@ Riga 5: / Riga 5: @@
 {{TOCright}}
-==2008==
+==2008 January ==
-=== January ===
 *{{cite news
 |first=
@@ Riga 61: / Riga 60: @@
 * [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2250498,00.asp Wikipedia Looks Toward Collaborative Video], by  Brian Heater, 18 gennaio 2008
-===February===
+==2008 February==
 *{{cite news

@@ Riga 25: / Riga 25: @@
 |language=
 |quote= }}
-:* The launch of Wikia gets extensive reportage in the media with frequent mention of its relationship to Wikipedia. Many are critical.
+: The launch of Wikia gets extensive reportage in the media with frequent mention of its relationship to Wikipedia. Many are critical.
 ::[http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ed891746-bd8a-11dc-b7e6-0000779fd2ac.html Financial Times], [http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2008/tc2008017_308710.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_technology Business Week], [http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS106284+07-Jan-2008+BW20080107 Reuters], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7174587.stm BBC News]
 *{{cite news
 |first=Pierre-François

@@ Riga 568: / Riga 568: @@
 *:Looks at the world wide demise of print encyclopedias and how Wikipedia has come to dominate.
-*{{cite news|last=Cohen|first=Noam|title=Open-Source Troubles in Wiki World|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/technology/17wikipedia.html|publisher=''[[The New York Times]]''|date=2008-03-17|accessdate2008-03-17}}
+ {{cite news|last=Cohen|first=Noam|title=Open-Source Troubles in Wiki World|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/technology/17wikipedia.html|publisher=''[[The New York Times]]''|date=2008-03-17|accessdate2008-03-17}}
 *:General article about Wales and recent controversies such as Marsden, Danny Wool's allegations and Wales' relationship with Roger McNamee and Elevation Partners.

← Versione meno recente	Versione delle 18:19, 9 mar 2009
(Nessuna differenza)

@@ Riga 270: / Riga 270: @@
 The reason every bottom-up crowd-source hive-mind needs some top-down control is because of time. The bottom runs on a different time scale than our instant culture.|--[[User:Andrea|Andrea]] ([[User talk:Andrea|discussione]]) 16:42, 20 feb 2009 (CET)|<ref>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/02/the_bottom_is_n.php</ref>}}
 {{Citazione|It's taken a while but I think we've learned that while top-down is needed, not much of it is needed. Editorship and expertise are like vitamins. You don't need much of them, just a trace even for a large body, and too much will be toxic, or just pissed away. But the proper dosage of intelligent control will vitalize the dumb hive mind.|--[[User:Andrea|Andrea]] ([[User talk:Andrea|discussione]]) 16:42, 20 feb 2009 (CET)|<ref>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/02/the_bottom_is_n.php</ref>}}
 *{{cite news |title=Area Man Honored To Be One Who Added Death Date To Heath Ledger's Wikipedia Page |url=http://www.theonion.com/content/news/area_man_honored_to_be_one_who |work=[[The Onion]] |date=[[2008-02-16]] }}

@@ Riga 267: / Riga 267: @@
 *:The piece isn't about Wikipedia per se, but it is quite relevant. It discusses the encyclopedia building process in wikipedia at present and speculates how it might evolve in the future. via [http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/02/14/bottom_up_is_not_enough_even_for_wikipedia.html guardian article]
-{{Citazione|It's taken a while but I think we've learned that while top-down is needed, not much of it is needed. Editorship and expertise are like vitamins. You don't need much of them, just a trace even for a large body, and too much will be toxic, or just pissed away. But the proper dosage of intelligent control will vitalize the dumb hive mind.|<ref>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/02/the_bottom_is_n.php</ref>|--[[User:Andrea|Andrea]] ([[User talk:Andrea|discussione]]) 16:31, 20 feb 2009 (CET)}}
+{{Citazione|And now that crowd-sourcing and social webs are all the rage, it's worth repeating: the bottom is not enough. You need a bit of top-down as well.
 *{{cite news |title=Area Man Honored To Be One Who Added Death Date To Heath Ledger's Wikipedia Page |url=http://www.theonion.com/content/news/area_man_honored_to_be_one_who |work=[[The Onion]] |date=[[2008-02-16]] }}