italiano - español
<analytics uacct="UA-6089322-1" ></analytics>

Storia di Wikipedia - Fonti: differenze tra le versioni

Da Cantiere.
(→‎User: :sanger)
m (User:Larry Sanger - Meta-Wikimedia)
Riga 107: Riga 107:
 
===meta.wikipedia.org===
 
===meta.wikipedia.org===
 
* [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/History_of_Wikipedia Wikipedia timeline]
 
* [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/History_of_Wikipedia Wikipedia timeline]
 +
* [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Larry_Sanger User:Larry Sanger - Meta-Wikimedia]
  
 
==Articoli==
 
==Articoli==

Versione delle 19:05, 8 mar 2009

{{#ifexpr: 0 = 1|
{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|<h{{{livello}}} style="font-size:100%;border:0;margin:0;padding:0;color:inherit;text-align:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">}}WikiGuide{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|</h{{{livello}}}>}}
{{#if:Template:WikiGuide|}}
Copione WikiGuide: Wikipedia · Commons · Wikisource · Wikiquote
Organizzazione: Progetto · Portineria · Gruppo su Facebook
 
{{#if:|
[[|]]
}}
| {{#if:|
[[Immagine:{{{sfondo}}}|center]]
}}
{{#if:Nuvola_apps_help_index.png‎|24px}}}}
WikiGuide
WikiGuide

Copione WikiGuide: Wikipedia · Commons · Wikisource · Wikiquote
Organizzazione: Progetto · Portineria · Gruppo su Facebook

[[|]]
}}
{{#ifexpr: 0 = 1|
{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|<h{{{livello}}} style="font-size:100%;border:0;margin:0;padding:0;color:inherit;text-align:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">}}Press Coverage{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|</h{{{livello}}}>}}
{{#if:Template:Press Coverage|}}
 
{{#if:|
[[|]]
}}
| {{#if:|
[[Immagine:{{{sfondo}}}|center]]
}}
{{#if:Nuvola_apps_help_index.png‎|24px}}}}
Press Coverage
Press Coverage

Unsorted: · 2001-2003 · 2004: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2005: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2006: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic ·
2007: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2008: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2009 · Scientific articles
Sorted: The Register

[[|]]
}}


Le fonti per scrivere la Storia di Wikipedia sono divise in 3 gruppi:

  • Press Coverage: articoli, post, trasmissioni tv, articoli scientifici,... ordinati per anno/mese
  • Pagine web dei progetti Wikipedia: cronologie, pagine storiche, discussioni (elencate in questa pagina)
  • Fonti 'private': mail, comunicazioni interne, comunicazioni personali, indiscrezioni,... (elencate in questa pagina)

web.archive.org

wikipedia.com

Nupedia.com

su en.wiki

Voci rilevanti

Analisi della cronologia della voce Wikipedia in inglese

Namespace:Wikipedia

{{#if:| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET)||class="hiddenStructure noprint"}}
(Testo originale) (Traduzione)
Btn edit.gif
«The Arbitration Committee is a panel of experienced users that exists to impose binding solutions to Wikipedia disputes that neither communal discussion, administrators, nor mediation have been able to resolve, and to consider certain cases where exceptional factors such as privacy preclude a public hearing. Arbitration is the last step in the dispute resolution process: it is a last resort, only to be employed when all else has failed.»
 Btn edit.gif
«{{{3}}}»
{{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET)|
(--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET))
}} 		Btn edit.gif
«The Arbitration Committee is a panel of experienced users that exists to impose binding solutions to Wikipedia disputes that neither communal discussion, administrators, nor mediation have been able to resolve, and to consider certain cases where exceptional factors such as privacy preclude a public hearing. Arbitration is the last step in the dispute resolution process: it is a last resort, only to be employed when all else has failed.»
{{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET)|
(--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET))
}}

}}

{{#if:| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET)||class="hiddenStructure noprint"}}
(Testo originale) (Traduzione)
Btn edit.gif
«Until the beginning of 2004, Jimbo Wales dealt with all serious disputes other than simple vandalism (straightforward vandals could be blocked by any administrator). He was also the only person with the authority to ban users. His role in dispute handling has now largely been delegated to the Arbitration Committee. Wales wrote in January 2004:
The Arbitration Committee [...] can impose a solution that I'll consider to be binding, with of course the exception that I reserve the right of executive clemency and indeed even to dissolve the whole thing if it turns out to be a disaster. But I regard that as unlikely, and I plan to do it about as often as the Queen of England dissolves Parliament against their wishes, i.e., basically never, but it is one last safety valve for our values.
In April 2007, Wales confirmed that the Committee could overturn any decision he makes in his traditional capacity within Wikipedia. »
 Btn edit.gif
«{{{3}}}»
{{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET)|
(--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET))
}} 		Btn edit.gif
«Until the beginning of 2004, Jimbo Wales dealt with all serious disputes other than simple vandalism (straightforward vandals could be blocked by any administrator). He was also the only person with the authority to ban users. His role in dispute handling has now largely been delegated to the Arbitration Committee. Wales wrote in January 2004:
The Arbitration Committee [...] can impose a solution that I'll consider to be binding, with of course the exception that I reserve the right of executive clemency and indeed even to dissolve the whole thing if it turns out to be a disaster. But I regard that as unlikely, and I plan to do it about as often as the Queen of England dissolves Parliament against their wishes, i.e., basically never, but it is one last safety valve for our values.
In April 2007, Wales confirmed that the Committee could overturn any decision he makes in his traditional capacity within Wikipedia. »
{{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET)|
(--Christian (discussione) 01:46, 22 feb 2009 (CET))
}}

}}

Un esempio di MeatBall:DelegateResponsibility.
"Also note that the UseMod wiki originally deleted old histories after a couple weeks, so very early versions of some pages may still be gone; they were not saved and cannot be restored."

User

Interessante, anche se non approfondito. Da' qualche informazione e qualche nome. --Andrea (discussione) 13:54, 16 feb 2009 (CET)
{{#if:| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 16:51, 8 mar 2009 (CET)||class="hiddenStructure noprint"}}
(Testo originale) (Traduzione)
Btn edit.gif
«I suggested that instead of just using the wiki with Nupedia's approved staff, he open it up to the general public and let each edit appear on the site immediately, with no review process. Instead of preventing error and bias, I said to openly invite error and bias and make it very easy for people to correct them. My exact words were to allow "any fool in the world with Internet access" to freely modify any page on the site. Also, I said that on wikis, there are no "completed" articles, there is just endless chaos and conflict. I suggested that this might actually lead to better reliability and richer content than the careful, circumspect approach.

Larry raised some objections and we debated a bit. Couldn't people just vandalize the site? I said yes, and other people could then repair the vandalism. Couldn't total idiots put up blatantly false or biased descriptions of things, to advance their ideological agendas? I said yes, and other idiots could delete those changes or edit them into something better.

[...]

Larry was not completely convinced by my answers to his objections about quality, but he definitely liked the way the wiki concept enabled a great increase in editing speed, and he was eager to try it. We went over to his apartment, and he tried to call his boss at Bomis, Jimbo Wales. Jimbo didn't answer, so Larry left voicemail.»
 Btn edit.gif
«{{{3}}}»
{{#if:--Christian (discussione) 16:51, 8 mar 2009 (CET)|
(--Christian (discussione) 16:51, 8 mar 2009 (CET))
}} 		Btn edit.gif
«I suggested that instead of just using the wiki with Nupedia's approved staff, he open it up to the general public and let each edit appear on the site immediately, with no review process. Instead of preventing error and bias, I said to openly invite error and bias and make it very easy for people to correct them. My exact words were to allow "any fool in the world with Internet access" to freely modify any page on the site. Also, I said that on wikis, there are no "completed" articles, there is just endless chaos and conflict. I suggested that this might actually lead to better reliability and richer content than the careful, circumspect approach.

Larry raised some objections and we debated a bit. Couldn't people just vandalize the site? I said yes, and other people could then repair the vandalism. Couldn't total idiots put up blatantly false or biased descriptions of things, to advance their ideological agendas? I said yes, and other idiots could delete those changes or edit them into something better.

[...]

Larry was not completely convinced by my answers to his objections about quality, but he definitely liked the way the wiki concept enabled a great increase in editing speed, and he was eager to try it. We went over to his apartment, and he tried to call his boss at Bomis, Jimbo Wales. Jimbo didn't answer, so Larry left voicemail.»
{{#if:--Christian (discussione) 16:51, 8 mar 2009 (CET)|
(--Christian (discussione) 16:51, 8 mar 2009 (CET))
}}

}}

Questi sono i ricordi di Ben Kovitz. Larry Sanger gli ha risposto e la sua risposta la si può leggere di seguito. Un po' pignoletto? Si è sviluppata la tipica polemica produttore-regista o regista-sceneggiatore... --Christian (discussione) 17:02, 8 mar 2009 (CET)

Mailing lists

Già riportate nelle citazioni alla pagina "Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee". --Christian (discussione) 02:06, 22 feb 2009 (CET)
Già riportate nelle citazioni alla pagina "Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee". --Christian (discussione) 02:06, 22 feb 2009 (CET)

Altro

Niente di particolarmente rilevante, presentazione generale.

su it.wiki

Voce "Wikipedia"

meta.wikipedia.org

Articoli

Stephen Colbert

Intervista al solito ironica e irriverente, niente di particolare. --Andrea (discussione) 13:19, 16 feb 2009 (CET)
Video satirico e divertente sul fatto che la realtà in wiki è generata in base al consenso: se ci mettiamo d'accordo, possiamo scrivere quello che vogliamo e cambiare la realtà ;-) --Andrea (discussione) 12:35, 16 feb 2009 (CET)

2008

  • [1] Articolo di Gar Campbell su come inserire contenuti commerciali su Wikipedia.
Interessante approfondimento da parte di chi, per la prima volta, vuole inserire contenuti commerciali (i.e. la voce della propria azienda); pieno di criche e consigli per chi vuole affrontare questa impresa. --Andrea (discussione) 14:47, 16 feb 2009 (CET)

2007

Analisi statistica del modello wiki: il modello di Wikipedia funziona. Più modifiche subisce una voce, più è facile che ne subisca, più infine migliorerà in obiettività ed accuratezza. Articolo molto tecnico che però da una prima quantitativa prova dell'efficenza del metodo wiki. --Andrea (discussione) 01:58, 16 feb 2009 (CET)

Marshall Poe

  • Marshall Poe, "The Hive", The Atlantic Monthly, September 2006.
Molto interessante, con molti spunti sulla storia di WP nel 2001 --Christian (discussione) 18:18, 15 feb 2009 (CET)
articolo molto bello ed originale, analizza la storia non solo di Wikipedia ma dei suoi fondatori, Sanger e Wales, del contesto di Internet di allora e dei wiki in generale. Interessante l'approfondimento "filosofico" dei principi del "wiki magic". --Andrea (discussione) 00:46, 16 feb 2009 (CET)
Interessante analisi del NPOV attraverso l'esempio della voce "Abortion". --Christian (discussione) 18:31, 15 feb 2009 (CET)
Mostrando varie versioni dell'incipit, si può notare come progressivamente la discussioni si sposti ai particolari (termini usati, posizione delle parole). Anche se non si arriva ad un vero e proprio consenso, queste voci sono sicuramente le più "affidabili" (poichè discusse, litigate e controllate da decine di persone). --Andrea (discussione) 02:27, 16 feb 2009 (CET)
Niente di particolarmente rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 18:18, 15 feb 2009 (CET)
  • "Common Knowledge", The Atlantic Monthly, August 1, 2006. Marshall Poe on the marvels and pitfalls of Wikipedia, the fastest-growing encyclopedia in human history.
Estratto da "http://biasco.ch/wiki/index.php?title=Storia_di_Wikipedia_-_Fonti&oldid=5221"