Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2005gen-apr

{{#ifexpr: 0 = 1|

{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|<h{{{livello}}} style="font-size:100%;border:0;margin:0;padding:0;color:inherit;text-align:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">}}WikiGuide{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|</h{{{livello}}}>}}

{{#if:Template:WikiGuide|

modifica

}}

Copione WikiGuide: Wikipedia · Commons · Wikisource · Wikiquote
Organizzazione: Progetto · Portineria · Gruppo su Facebook

{{#if:|

[[|]]

}}

| {{#if:|

[[Immagine:{{{sfondo}}}|center]]

}}

{{#if:Nuvola_apps_help_index.png‎|

}}

WikiGuide

modifica

Copione WikiGuide: Wikipedia · Commons · Wikisource · Wikiquote
Organizzazione: Progetto · Portineria · Gruppo su Facebook

[[|]]

}}

{{#ifexpr: 0 = 1|

{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|<h{{{livello}}} style="font-size:100%;border:0;margin:0;padding:0;color:inherit;text-align:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">}}Press Coverage{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|</h{{{livello}}}>}}

{{#if:Template:Press Coverage|

modifica

}}

Unsorted: · 2001-2003 · 2004: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2005: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2006: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic ·

2007: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2008: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2009 · Scientific articles

Sorted: The Register

{{#if:|

[[|]]

}}

| {{#if:|

[[Immagine:{{{sfondo}}}|center]]

}}

{{#if:Nuvola_apps_help_index.png‎|

}}

Press Coverage

modifica

Unsorted: · 2001-2003 · 2004: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2005: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2006: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic ·
2007: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2008: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2009 · Scientific articles
Sorted: The Register

[[|]]

}}

Indice

1 2005 January
2 2005 February
3 2005 March
- 3.1 Wired, 2 marzo 2005
4 2005 April
- 4.1 slashdot.org, 18 aprile 2005
- 4.2 slashdot.org, 19 aprile 2005

2005 January

{{

 #if:Roush
 |{{
    #if: 
    |[[ |Roush{{
       #if: Wade
       |, Wade
     }}]]
    |Roush{{
       #if: Wade
       |, Wade
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: 
       |; 
       |{{#if:| & |; }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |[[ |{{
          #if: 
          |, 
        }}]]
       |{{
          #if: 
          |, 
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |{{
          #if: 
          |; 
          |{{#if:| & |; }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |[[ |{{
             #if: 
             |, 
           }}]]
          |{{
             #if: 
             |, 
           }}
        }}{{
          #if:
          |{{
             #if: 
             |; 
             |{{#if:| & |; }}
           }}{{
             #if: 
             |[[ |{{
                #if: 
                |, 
              }}]]
             |{{
                #if: 
                |, 
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             |{{
                #if: 
                |; 
                |{{#if:| & |; }}
              }}{{
                #if: 
                |[[ |{{
                   #if: 
                   |, 
                 }}]]
                |{{
                   #if: 
                   |, 
                 }}
              }}{{
                #if:
                |{{
                   #if: 
                   |; 
                   |{{#if:| & |; }}
                 }}{{
                   #if: 
                   |[[ |{{
                      #if: 
                      |, 
                    }}]]
                   |{{
                      #if: 
                      |, 
                    }}
                 }}{{
                   #if:
                   |{{
                      #if: 
                      |; 
                      |{{#if:| & |; }}
                    }}{{
                      #if: 
                      |[[ |{{
                         #if: 
                         |, 
                       }}]]
                      |{{
                         #if: 
                         |, 
                       }}
                    }}{{
                      #if:
                      |{{
                         #if: 
                         |; 
                         |{{#if:| & |; }}
                       }}{{
                         #if: 
                         |[[ |{{
                            #if: 
                            |, 
                          }}]]
                         |{{
                            #if: 
                            |, 
                          }}
                       }}{{
                         #if:
                         |;  et al.
                       }}
                    }}
                 }}
              }}
           }}
        }}
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{#if:January 2005|January 2005|  }}
    | ({{#if:January 2005|January 2005|  }}){{
      #if:
    | [{{{YearNote}}}]
    }}
  }}
 |{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: 
       |[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}]]
       |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |; {{
          #if: 
          |[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}]]
          |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |;  {{
             #if: 
             |[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}]]
             |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             | et al.
           }}
        }}
      }}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
       #if: {{#if:January 2005|January 2005|  }}
       | ({{#if:January 2005|January 2005|  }})
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: {{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
 |{{
    #if:Roush 
    |.  
  }}{{#if: {{
          #if: 
          |
          |{{
             #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
             |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
             |{{
                #if: 
                |http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
              }}
           }} 
        }} 
 | [{{
          #if: 
          |
          |{{
             #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
             |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
             |{{
                #if: 
                |http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
              }}
           }} 
        }} {{
          #if: 
          |{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
          |"{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}"
        }}] 
 | {{
          #if: 
          |{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
          |"{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}"
        }}

}} }}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #ifeq:  | 
    |
    |{{
       #if: Roush{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
       |. written at 
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #if: Roush
    |. {{
       #if: {{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
       |in 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}]]
       |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}}}{{
       #if: 
       |; {{
          #if: 
          |[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}]]
          |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |; {{
             #if: 
             |[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}]]
             |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             | et al.
           }}
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: {{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
       |
       |. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #if: Roush
    |. }}{{
    #if: {{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
    |"{{#if: {{
             #if: {{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                | {{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                   }} 
                 
              }}
           }} 
 | [{{
             #if: {{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                | {{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                   }} 
                 
              }}
           }} {{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}] 
 | {{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}

}}"}} }}{{

#if: 
  |  (in )
}}{{#if:
  | ()
}}{{
  #if: |{{
      #if:{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}{{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}|. }}'{{
    #if: 
    |. 
  }}{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: Technology Review
       | (: Technology Review)
       | ()
     }}
    |{{
       #if: Technology Review
       | (Technology Review)
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: 
    | '{{
       #if: 
       | ()
     }}
    |{{
       #if: 
       | ()
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
    |:  {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
  }}
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
    |{{
       #if: Roush{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
       |. 
     }}{{#if: {{
             #if: {{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                |{{ 
                   #if:  
                   |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=       
                 }}
              }}
           }} 
 | [{{
             #if: {{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                |{{ 
                   #if:  
                   |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=       
                 }}
              }}
           }} {{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}] 
 | {{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}

}}}}{{

       #if: 
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |. '
     }}{{
       #if:  
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       | ( ed.)
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: Technology Review
       |{{
          #if: 
          |:
          |.
        }} Technology Review
     }}
  }}{{
 #if: Roush
 |
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:January 2005|January 2005|  }}
    |. {{#if:January 2005|January 2005|  }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #ifeq:  | {{#if:January 2005|January 2005|  }}
    |
    |{{
       #if: 
       |{{
          #if: Roush
          |. 
          | (published )
        }}
       |{{
          #if: 
          |. 
          | (published )
        }}
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |
 |{{
    #if: {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
    |. {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
  }}

}}{{

if:

 |. doi:{{#if:  
    |  (inactive ) {{#ifeq:  |  | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y |  }}]] }}
    | 
   }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |.

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. ISBN

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. ISSN [1]

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. OCLC [2]

}}{{

 #if:  
 |. PMID

}}{{

 #if:  
 |{{#if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
    |. PMC: [3]
  }}

}}{{

 #if:  
 |. Bibcode: [4]

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. {{{Archive}}}
 |{{
   #if:{{#if:|http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f}}
   |. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f}} 
 | [{{#if:|http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f}} the original] 
 | the original

}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{

     #if:
     | on 
     |. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}} 
     }}
   |{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:|Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}{{#if:||Larry Sanger's Knowledge Free-for-All}}
    |. {{
                                     #if: 
                                     |
                                     |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
                                   }}
    |. {{
             #if: 
             |
             |http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/14071/?a=f
           }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
   #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
     #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
       
     }}
   }}
  }}
    | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
   #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
     #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
       
     }}
   }}
  }}
    }}

}}{{#if:

 |. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}

}}{{#if:

 |  ()

}}{{#if:

 |.  ""

}}{{#if:||.}}

Articolo su Larry Sanger. Niente di particolarmente rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 08:22, 9 mar 2009 (CET)

Klemm, Aaron E. "Motivation and value of free resources: Wikipedia and PlanetMath show the way". Free Software Magazine. January 1, 2005[5]

"Wikipedia is blurring the lines of production with astounding success."

Krowne, Aaron. "The FUD-based Encyclopedia: Dismantling fear, uncertainty, and doubt, aimed at Wikipedia and other free knowledge resources." Free Software Magazine. January 3, 2005. [6]

"I have never used an encyclopedia as much as Wikipedia and I thank the Wikipedia community for what they have created. Countless others share these sentiments. Wikipedia has enhanced my life and brought considerable progress to society."

Rupley, Sebastian. "Wikis at Work." PC Magazine. January 3, 2005. [7]

"One of the more robust wikis is at www.wikipedia.com, which bills itself as "the free encyclopedia." It is a multilingual, open-content encyclopedia that anyone can edit."

National Business Review. January 4, 2005

Till, Francis. "Tsunami blogging: The curl in the wave, first hand." National Business Review. January 4, 2005. [8]

"You can get a really good consensus picture of what's going on that's stronger than any one news organization could offer," Jimmy Wales, founder of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, told Silicon Valley. "So many people are on the ground in different places. And people pick up very quickly which are the bloggers to read, and they bring that information to the forefront and amplify it."

Tanner, Alex. "Design fair restructures in light of disaster." Netimperative (UK). [9]

"Alex Steffen from worldchanging.com and Jimmy Wales of wikipedia have been drafted into the programme [the Doors of Perception design symposium] to assist."

Gapper, John. "A new entrant to the knowledge market." Financial Times. January 5, 2005. [10] (available free).

"The only instant reference work is Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia written by anybody who wants to contribute. If you look now (www.wikipedia.org), there is a first draft of history, with a simulation of how the tidal wave spread across the ocean, a table of estimated deaths in different countries and links to entries on related subjects." (entire article about Wikipedia)

Johnson, Bobbie. "Emergency services." The Guardian. January 6, 2005. [11]

"Within a few hours of the quake, users were logging on to communal online encyclopedia Wikipedia and compiling a breakdown of what had occurred, including scientific analysis, links to news articles and ways to give aid."

Author unknown. "Love at first site as Wikipedia keeps growing." Jewish Chronicle. January 7, 2005.

"Wikipedia recently celebrated its one millionth entry which, I am delighted to reveal, was a Hebrew article on the Kazakhstan flag - well, someone's going to be interested".

A quote from The Guardian on vandalism and reversions follows.

Mustard, Laurie. "Strollin' through Wikipedia . . ." Winnipeg Sun. January 8, 2005. [12]

"I have found the most fascinating website titled Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, and you're going to love it." (entire column about Wikipedia)

Naughton, John. "Why encyclopaedic row speaks volumes about the old guard." The Observer. January 9, 2005. [13]

Writing about the current debate about Wikipedia Naughton opines: "five years from now, when the Wikipedia is essential infrastructure, we'll hardly remember what the fuss was about."

Wired News. January 10, 2005

Terdiman, Daniel. "Wikipedia Faces Growing Pains" Wired News. January 10, 2005. [14]

On the tension between academic credibility and collaboration, and concludes with, "The question, then, is what people should expect of Wikipedia. As it grows and becomes a repository of 2 million entries from more and more contributors, more of whom are experts in their fields, it probably will be seen as on par with the Britannicas of the world. But first it must convince those experts to become involved, and that will likely mean finding a way to make them feel welcome.."

The Triangle. January 14, 2005

Corkery, Paul. "Wikipedia reinvents information searching." The Triangle. January 14, 2005.[15]

Regardless of its risk of inaccuracy, Wikipedia exists as a noteworthy experiment relating to the idea of Internet users to come together in the spirit of knowledge and learning. What had the potential to become a public toilet of misinformation exists instead as one of the most successful examples of a human oriented, self policing collaborative education effort.

I cannot, because of the reasons pointed out by various resources, plug Wikipedia as the be-all-end-all research tool. However, Wikipedia itself represents a noteworthy use of the Internet and its growing pool of users. Coordinated development projects, as well as national and international Internet based communities and the technologies used in their operation, offer a fascinating look into the lesser known value of how the world's premier communication tool deals with information.

Wikipedia, despite its potential flaws, builds upon the noble foundation upon which the Internet was formed - A digital world in which the free exchange of information and knowledge brings the world together through the sharing of ideas and concepts.

Burt, Steve. "A Wiki-margin for the Internet". eSchool News. January 12, 2005. [16]

Well ... perhaps wikis won’t quite take off this year to the degree that weblogs did in 2004, but there is not doubt in my mind that you will be hearing much more about wikis in the months to come. If you are not familiar with wikis, they are open-editable web pages. That is, pages which you can edit the content by simply clicking on one button (usually an ‘edit’ tab) from within your browser. Take a look at Wikipedia to find out a bit more.

If you want to begin experimenting with Wikis right away and you have Firefox installed on your machine, then I’d urge you to visit Wikalong.org and download the wikalong extension. This extension embeds a wiki in the sidebar of your browser, indexed off the url of the current page you are visiting. That is, wikalong builds a ‘parallel’ wiki for any page you visit. Thus, you can comment, discuss and wax philosophical about any issue on a page you are visiting.

In terms of how you and your students could use wikalong, on the simplest level it can be used as a running commentary or parallel blog to whatever page you are looking at. Of course, you can embed links to point to other interesting pages. Simple note-taking or really anything else that you might use a blog, wiki or discussion board for. In addition to the panoply of possible uses, the other strength of wikalong is that you-as-the-user don’t have to install anything on a server or rely on any IT support beyond having Firefox and knowing how to surf the Web.

Tim Lauer originally pointed me towards this tool so as you get it installed you’ll see a bit of commentary between he and I on some of these pages. You’ll notice that Wikalong has a log-in feature which allows posters to connect with each other.

Atticus. The Sunday Times (London). January 16, 2005. [17]
"It must be where Tony Blair learned all about spin and inflation. The prime minister’s biography in Wikipedia, the internet encyclopaedia that its users write, claims that between the ages of 13 and 15 'he worked during school holidays as a bicycle repairer in the local hardware store'. A prankster’s work, sadly."

Hsueh, Hungfu. "Taiwan Encyclopedia opens site to users". Taiwan News. January 19, 2005. [18]
"Chiang Shao-ting, Senior Adviser of the encyclopedia project, highlighted the fact that the Taiwan Encyclopedia will allowing users to edit or add new key words. 'Like the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia which is highly popular among users, the Taiwan Encyclopedia will also be a open platform that allows user to contribute to its content.'"

Penenberg, Adam L.. "Like it or not, Blogs Have legs". Wired News. January 20, 2005. [19]
In the world of words, the closest analogy would be Wikipedia, the web citizen's encyclopedia that is compiled exclusively by volunteers. The problem is, since anyone can write anything about anybody or anything without any oversight, the quality is often uneven. For example, I plugged myself (a subject I am somewhat familiar with) into its search engine and found a glaring error and a typo in the short, 95-word passage. Like consensus, Wikipedia is wonderful for getting people active in the process, but perhaps not as good for editorial accuracy. (Then again, have you seen The New York Times' correction box?)

Taylor, Dave. "What's Acceptable Search Engine "Spam" Technique?". InformIT. January 21, 2005. [20]
"For example, Wikis are singled out as a bad technology, yet a Wiki is just a minimalist shared white board, a technology that lets a group of people share the maintenance of Web-based content. The most popular is probably Wikipedia, which is a fabulous resource, but even Net-savvy publisher O'Reilly has a Wiki that they use to manage the interaction between the company, their authors, and user groups.

"The argument of the article author, though, is that Wikis are dangerous because anyone can -- theoretically -- add content and therefore add bogus links back to a third-party site. Are Wikis therefore bad because people can "spam" them? Of course not.

"Just like comments on a weblog or entries in a guestbook, pages on a Wiki should be monitored to ensure that the information thereon is relevant."

Unsigned article. "Written by whoever wants to". Revista VEJA. January 23, 2005.
VEJA magazine, a brazilian weekly publication, published an article on Wikipedia stating its contents aren't reliable since anyone online can edit them. To prove their point, VEJA spread misinformation on wikipedia about brazilian president Lula, which is stated in their January 23 article. "Deliberate misinformation on Lula's article spread by VEJA stayed untouched for 48 hours"

Société de transport de Montréal. "Les meilleurs sites Internet: Le métro de Montréal sur le web." Info STM. Métro (Montreal), 26 January 2005, p. 21. [21] (.pdf format)

"Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia on the Web, containing hundreds of thousands of articles in more than fifty languages. Unlike other encyclopedias, the text is written by the users themselves. In the case of the Montreal metro, there can be no doubt about the quality of its information, as the page was written with the collaboration of none other than [Montréalais]!"

note: This is an information page prepared by the STM, printed in the Métro free newspaper as a condition of its distribution in metro stations. The article, on websites about the metro, had previously referred to my website on the metro. -- Montréalais 19:21, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Rubel, Steve. "Wikis Pose A Threat To Costly Media Directories." WebProNews. January 27, 2005. [22]

"In the future, PR professionals - and even consumers - will create their own media directories. For a glimpse of this today, check out this page on Wikipedia. They are starting to index journalists, including Jennifer 8. Lee of the New York Times. The paid services better evolve fast. Because in the near future as wikis become more popular and easier to set up, we may end up forming our own tool that enables us to share our knowledge. "

Mossberg, Walter S. "Unlike Search Engines, Answers.Com Responds With Data, Not Links". Wall Street Journal. January 27, 2005. [23]

"There are some downsides to Answers.com. It has answers for only about a million available topics so far. And it relies heavily on Wikipedia, which has been criticized because it isn't written or edited by experts. But unlike some recognized sources like the online Encyclopedia Britannica, Answers.com is free and instantly searches multiple reference works from multiple publishers."

Edit War su Perverted-Justice.com

"Wikipedia Battle over Controversial Web Site Entry Ended". ChatMag. January 29, 2005. [24]

Details a controversy at Perverted-Justice.com.

Cone, Edward. "Making inside of newsroom as big as outside". Greensboro News & Record. January 30, 2005. [25]

"Then there was Jimmy Wales, founder of the Wikipedia, a collaborative online encyclopedia written and edited on the Web by thousands of people around the world (wikis are software that allow groups to work together online). The free encyclopedia is trustworthy, huge, multilingual and growing, and is produced for only a fraction of what gets spent by traditional competitors."

Hunt, Kurt. "Four hours to a smarter you". Eastern Echo (Eastern Michigan University). January 31, 2005. [26]

"Truly informed people know more than what CNN feeds them—they take the time to look into the background of topics, to learn about how things come about, and how they interrelate. Which is why you are now heading to wikipedia.org, an Internet-compiled, completely free, community-written encyclopedia."

Hall, Mark. "Open-Source Gnaws Its Way Into..." Computerworld. January 31, 2005. [27]

"In addition, Clusty includes thumbnail images from www.wikipedia.com with selected results, which breaks up pages and makes them easier to read."

2005 February

McHugh, Josh. "The Firefox Explosion." Wired Magazine. February 2005, p.97. [28]

"Firefox's assault on Internet Explorer isn't the only attack Bill Gates is facing. A ragtag coalition of open source projects is steadily chipping away at the Microsoft empire. Here's a look at market share on eight different fronts. …
"Web encylopedias – Encarta Premium: 68,000 entries; Wikipedia: 431,195 entries" – Illustration, "Storming Redmond" [29]

Waters, Richard. "In search of more: the "friendly" engines that will manage the data of daily life". Financial Times. February 1, 2005.

"Already, internet blogs and communal internet pages known as wikis (from the Hawaiian word for "speedy") are pushing the boundaries of what was known as "user-generated content". Results from Wikipedia, a free encyclopaedia maintained over the internet by volunteers, may not match the standards of publications produced by professional editors, but the service still manages to answer many common questions."

Mahmud, Vishnu K. "Share global information with Wiki encyclopedia". The Jakarta Post. February 1, 2005.
Do you know the history of the airship? Or how to make a magnet?

In the "old days" (circa 1998), you would have had to open up a book or an encyclopedia to find the answers. Nowadays, however, you can simply "google" or web-search the answer with your computer and the Internet.

The World Wide Web is a massive network of virtual pages and hyperlinks, making it an ideal source of information. But its decentralized nature can also make it extremely difficult to find or upload data towards the advancement of knowledge. Is there a centralized website online where wisdom can be stored and shared?

Enter Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org). Created by the WikiMedia Foundation (www.wikimediafoundation.org), this free online encyclopedia allows everyone to access, edit and share informational content in a variety of languages.

McHenry, Robert. "On Getting It: The Faith-Based Encyclopedia and Me". Tech Central Station. February 1, 2005. [30]

Follow-up to the author's previous article from November 2004, "The Faith-Based Encyclopedia".

ElAmin, Ahmed. "Tech Tattle: A 'wiki' way of learning all about Bermuda". The Royal Gazette. February 2, 2005. [31]

"One of course should never rely completely on online information and should always check other reference sources for accuracy. However, Wikipedia seems to actually work most of the time because of the amount of users on the lookout for errors."

Dibbel, Julian. "Choose Your Own Encyclopedia". The Village Voice. February 3, 2005. [32]

"Go to any Wikipedia entry you choose—"Hindu philosophy," "drunk driving," "pataphysics"—and click on the Edit This Page tab. Bingo: Whatever you write immediately becomes the last word on the subject. And if this sounds like a recipe for mob rule, that's because it is. But mob rule turns out to be a surprisingly good way to write an encyclopedia."

Cherkoff, James. "What Is Open Source Marketing?" WebProNews. February 4, 2005. [33]

"Wikipedia is an Open Source encyclopaedia (recently recognised by the Press Association) containing 1.3 million articles in eight different languages, all written, developed and maintained by regular people around the world."

Green, Graeme. "Net Result - The best sites for... online encyclopaedias" London Metro. February 9, 2005.

"[Wikipedia logo; www.wikipedia.org; 5-star rating] Not the most visually striking site but very easy to navigate and you'll struggle to find a subject it can't provide information on. Highlighted keywords guide your search to more detailed information, related subjects or interesting tangents. Subjects can be edited and added to by users, which means the site continues to grow and cover increasingly diverse topics." [Review was on page 31 in the MetroLife feature. The 5-star rating was the best rating (5/5) of the three encyclopaedias reviewed. The others were www.probert-encyclopaedia.co.uk (3/5) and www.iep.utm.edu (4/5). This was typed out from the London Metro edition, though other editions of Metro are published in other UK cities.]

Menta, Richard (February 9, 2005). "WikiPod, The iPod Encyclopedia". MP3Newswire.net [34]
Mainly refers to a new site, WikiPod, however refers to Wikipedia:
"I came across this little posting today on PDATrends. A group is looking to start their own encyclopedia specifically for the iPod and they are soliciting articles for it. The site, which they call WikiPod, uses the same look and graphics of Wikipedia. I don't know if there is any direct relation to Wikipedia, which already has its own articles on the iPod and everything related."

Weiss, Aaron (February 10, 2005). "The Unassociated Press" New York Times, Circuits Section, p.E5.
"Wikinews is ... the latest... in a collection of Wikis under the umbrella of Wikimedia ... The largest Wiki project, Wikipedia, has been online for four years and contains more than 450,000 articles, all written and open to revision by its more than 150,000 users. ... Central to Wikinews is its commitment to neutrality, said Jimmy Wales ... president of the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation. ...

"Above all, the central question about the Wikinews effort is its credibility. "Making a newspaper is hard," said Robert McHenry, former editor in chief of Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Someone who wants to do it but doesn't really know how hasn't solved the problem by gathering a lot of other people who don't know, either.

"Mr. McHenry was skeptical about Wikinews's ability to provide a neutral point of view and its claim to be evenhanded. "The naïveté is stunning," he said."

Regan, Jim (February 11, 2005). "Wacky Wikipedia". The Christian Science Monitor [35]
"HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA – If I may take moment to state the patently obvious, there is a great deal of 'unusual' content on the web. From UFOs and Crop Circles to Dancing Hamsters and Headless Chickens, you can find it all online - but for the most part, each site only deals with a single unusual topic, and the sites themselves are spread far and wide. So where can the connoisseur of concentrated eccentricity go for a wide and varied selection of the peculiar in one convenient location? Well, that would be Wikipedia - where a collection of Unusual Articles can take you from Bat bombs to the Year 10,000 problem on a single page."

"A Problem Shared Is a Problem Solved" (no date). Fast Company. [36]
"Recently the idea has been transferred to all manner of projects ranging from an open source encyclopedia called the Wikipedia and collaborative industrial design such as ThinkCycle to open source aeroplane design, cola recipes, film scripts, and beer."

Shliferstein, Jim (February 10, 2005). "Freedom of Excretion". The Cornell Daily Sun Online. [37]
Basically, this guy wrote a piece on Wikipedia about he vandalised to be amusing. He refers to it again in his column Arrr!:

"The ferocity of these W.C. warriors, and the furious indigestive indignation with which they defend their ideas, is absolutely astounding. I've never seen such vitriol in such a trivial context -- except, perhaps, on the Internet, where similarly forgettable forums are littered with self-righteous diatribes and counter-diatribes, each thread taken mortally seriously by all of four people. (If you doubt it, consider that my column poking fun at Wikipedia geeks earned several angry, ten-page rebuttals from Wikipedia faithful -- or, as they are technically known, "Wikipedophiles.")"

"Google lends Wikipedia a hand".p2pnet.net. [38]

"...Microsoft ... loosed its own search engine ... Both Google and Yahoo are streets ahead of MSN launch in terms of both popularity and goodwill. ... Google has offered its support to assist Wikipedia by providing much needed storage and hosting services, says TechWhack, going on, “The deal is still in very early stages. Wikipedia has made it public that Google has not asked for any favors in returns, which includes any ad placement on Wikipedia pages. ... Google with the power and content of Wikipedia might make a lethal combination to empower the extent; knowledge is available to the end user on the Internet. But then considering Wikipedia already is open source, Google would not have needed any tech support from the developers of this online encyclopedia!”"

"Google Plans to add Encyclopedia Results to Searches; Wikipedia" (February 11, 2005). The Cranky Consumer. [39]
"Google.com, not missing a beat, looks like it is making plans to start using the Wiki Media online Encyclopedia project in its search results. Google has agreed to host some of the Company's wesite using Google Servers."

"Google may host encyclopedia project" (February 11, 2005). Cnet News.com [40]

"Wiki Media Foundation, the group behind the Wikipedia online encyclopedia project, said Friday that search giant Google has volunteered to host some of its content on company servers."

"Google Offers to Host Wikipedia" (February 11, 2005). BetaNews [41]

"From Internet domains to Web browsers, Google seems to have its hands all over the Web these days. But the search giant shows no signs of slowing its reach, and has offered to host the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. Wiki Media Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, says Google has volunteered to supply servers and bandwidth to the project."

Krevs, Paul (February 11, 2005). "Google Offers Assistance To Wikipedia". Neowin.net. [42]

"Google has offered to assist online encyclopedia Wikipedia, by providing some much needed storage and hosting services to the giant non-profit site. Although terms of the upcoming arrangement have yet to be finalized, Wikimedia commented that any deal will still see Wikipedia remaining ad-free; meaning that the arrangement will not impose Google "AdSense" technology on the popular site."

"GooglePedia? Google Wants to Help the Wikipedia". Search Engine Watch. [43]

"A post at Dirson kicked off a Slashdot discussion about Google offering to host "some" Wikimedia content. What this precisely means is not spelled out. A post on the Wikimedia wiki says that "terms" of the offer are being discussed and that a private IRC meeting is scheduled for March. It also mentions that Google's offer "does not mean" there will be a requirement to include advertising on Wikimedia sites. Stay tuned."

"Google & Wikimedia Sitting in a Tree..." (February 11, 2005). SearchViews. [44]
"Wikipedia is going to be getting a much-needed shot in the arm, thanks to a donation of bandwidth and servers from Google. The Wikimedia Foundation (the international non-profit that handles the development of the Wiki encyclopedia and other projects) is expected to announce an agreement with Google sometime soon. Until then they're mostly mum, but you can check out a short statement from Wikipedia here."

"Google Offers To Host Wikipedia" (February 11, 2005). TechNewsWorld. [45]
"Google searches already access Wikipedia and other Wikimedia resources through the services that host the organization's content, but some have speculated that Google wants the encyclopedia content to compete with MSN Search's Encarta content and Yahoo, which accesses the Columbia Encyclopedia."

"Wikinews Holds Online Conference with Bloggers" (February 11, 2005). Chatmag. [46]
Wikinews, a sub project of the Wikimedia Foundation, held an online conference with several prominent 'bloggers on Saturday, Feb. 5th. The purpose of the conference was to introduce bloggers to the concept of Wikinews, and to explore avenues to integrate blogging into the Wikinews sections.

Shields, Tom, "Sports Diary: Fleeting effect is right on the balls", (Glasgow) Sunday Herald 13 February 2005. [47]
In an article on the bigotry between supporters of Celtic and Rangers football clubs, he spotted the edit war on 11 February afternoon which resulted in both articles being protected.

"A small indication of how deep-seated is the conflict between the orange and the green could be seen this week on an obscure and verging on the academic encyclopedia website called Wikipedia. It is an anorak-inhabited environment where earnest folk are invited to contribute their knowledge of history, culture, life and everything. The opportunity for browsers to call up and edit entries on the Wikipedia proved too tempting for warriors on the Old Firm cyber battlefield."

"The entry for Rangers FC was adjusted to include the information that the club was founded by Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot and that one of their all-time great players was one Alvin Stardust. There was retaliation when Wikipedia readers were informed that Celtic “was founded by Brother Walfrid as a way to raise money for terribly thick Irish bogtrotters, mainly in the East of Glasgow. However, for her supporters, Celtic is much more than a football club, it is a great way to meet young boys and abuse them."

"The Wikipedia people were bewildered by the fact that the Celtic and Rangers entries were being edited almost by the minute to include a vast array of insult and accusation. They called an end to these “edit wars” and peace has broken out. It is unlikely that Cathy Jamieson will have equal success at her summit this week."

Hines, Matt (February 14, 2005). "Google may host encyclopedia project". ZDNet (taken from CNet news.com). [48]
"Wikipedia.org could soon be hosted on Google's servers, as the search giant looks for ways of supporting the Wikimedia Foundation."

"Dvorak on Google and Wikipedia" (February 15, 2005). Slashdot. [49]
"cryptoluddite writes 'PC Magazine has an article by John C. Dvorak expanding on the community discussion of Google's offer for free web hosting of Wikipedia. Those against the deal point out that Google may be planning to co-opt the encyclopedia as Googlepedia (by restricting access to the complete database). In a revealing speech given by the Google founders, Larry Page says he would 'like to see a model where you can buy into the world's content. Let's say you pay $20 per month.' Should public domain information be free?' It's a pretty scary scenario painted, but one can hardly take a speech from 2001 as serious evidence these days." (note that it links the second page of the article).

Dvorak, John C. (February 14, 2005). "Googlepedia: The End is Near". ZDNet. [50] [51]
"Google has been using Wikipedia to deliver appropriate results in a non-natural-language fashion, but would love to get hold of the entire database in-house so it would not have to continually spider the thing with its legions of Web crawlers. So the debate now begins. Should the Wikipedia folks get cozy with Google, a public company? The big fear seems to be the notion of letting the camel's head into the tent. Pretty soon the whole camel will be inside.

...

"Unfortunately, when you consistently look to be too generous, people get suspicious. You have to remember that this offer comes on the heels of the offer made to libraries by Google to digitize and host all the great books and documents in the world. Now this. Is Google trying to corner the all the world's information and then, once they have it all under their control, sell it back to us at a high fee?

"Or, more interestingly, is it possible that the plan is to control all these resources and then stick it to Microsoft when its search-engine Web crawler comes around? ACCESS DENIED! There is no doubt in my mind that this is a distinct possibility. But can it be accomplished without making a mess?

...

"But let's say that Google is as honorable as it claims and has no intention of doing anything more than making life better for everyone. I know most of the principals there, and they are as normal and sincere as can be expected. Nice guys, actually. But Google itself is a public corporation. It's its own animal in that regard, with attorneys and bean-counters making the "nice guys" who run the place beholden to the mythical shareholders, who demand results and accountability. Maybe the nice guys do not want to create a situation that locks out the Microsoft crawlers. The needs of the corporate entity, though, demand it. Maybe the nice guys don't want to take over Wikipedia and clean it up, change the way it works—ruin it—as per the lawyers' demands. The corporation demands it. Those nice guys are not working for themselves any more. We always have to remember that. They are now guests."

Farrel, Nick (15 February 2005). "Wikipedia might move to Google". the Inquirer. [52]

Gline, Matthew A. (15 February 2005). "Citing Riots". The Harvard Crimson. [53]
"The site is an astounding monument to human knowledge. To spend a few moments browsing its enormous tangle of links is to feel an awesome sense of the breadth and depth of what mankind has accomplished, and is also an opportunity to marvel at incredible human altruism: Apparently, millions of knowledgeable internet-goers have spent hours of their time painstakingly updating articles about poisonous toads and obscure biochemical reactions."

...

"Wikipedia also contains lies. I know, because I'm responsible for one of them: As of this writing, the year in which Yale University was founded according to the encyclopedia is not 1701 as it rightfully should be but 1702; I've committed my own personal one-year slight against the prestige of our younger sibling in New Haven."
The vandalism edit mentioned in the article is [54]; it was reverted by the same user [55].

Bujold, Shelley. "Kenora Knowledge Could Be Shared." Daily Miner and News (Kenora, Ontario), February 15, 2005.

"Wikipedia.org, a website dedicated to all things knowledge, doesn't have very much on the City of Kenora." (Talks about Wikipedia and suggests expanding the Kenora article)

Damiani, Jean-Philippe (16 February 2005). "Wikipedia : l'encyclopédie dont vous êtes l'auteur". Métro(Montreal).
"Any web surfer can volunteer to collaborate on Wikipedia from their computer. The articles are works in progress that can be modified and improved by anyone. There are rules, though: the content must be accurate and respect 'neutrality' on controversial subjects. Other participants can always correct errors, and a backup system allows users to return to previous versions if necessary. Still, the reader must be able to tell the wheat from the chaff in this bazaar of knowledge." [56] (enormous .pdf file, page 16)

Note: the article describes a report on Wikipedia on the Quebec TV show La revanche des nerdz, to be aired 17 Feb at 7:00 on Canal Z.

Sydell, Laura (20 February 2005). "Wikipedia's Growth Comes with Concerns". National Public Radio's Weekend Edition. [57]
"...as Wikipedia has grown dramatically in popularity, some have begun to question its accuracy.

"IRC and Internet Chat News and Information" (21 February, 2005). Chatmag News. [58]
"Wikipedia, the popular user edited online encyclopedia, has been shut down by a power outage at their colocation facility. Wikipedia has been in the news recently, the latest regarding Wikipedia and Google.com Google has offered to host the site, and a meeting is planned for March between the Wikipedia Foundation and Google."

"Power Outage Knocks Wikipedia Offline" (February 22, 2005). Netcraft. [59]
"The free online encyclopedia Wikipedia has been knocked offline by a power outage in its data center. While the servers hosting the site were down only a short time, much of the site's content remained offline as Wikimedia staff worked on properly restoring data from MySQL databases."

Lemon, Summer (February 22, 2005). "Power outage pulls plug on Wikipedia". The Industry Standard. [60]
"A power outage inside the facility that hosts Wikipedia's servers has forced the free, community-authored encyclopedia offline, according to a message posted on the Wikipedia Web site."

Heaton, Terry L. "The Devaluation of Information". OhmyNews International. February 22, 2005. [61]
"The Britannica has weathered many storms in the last 15 years, as technology has rewritten their business. Even now, the online "Wikipedia" -- which is written and edited by the public -- poses a new threat, but the company has faith in its model."

"FUSION : Web sites of the week". The South End (Wayne State University). February 23, 2005. [62]
"wikipedia.org — The free online encylopedia that anyone can edit. This vast resources of rants and scientific data might surprise you by its collective effort. There is a serious debate in the academic community now as whether or not to consider this amalgam of information as a legitimate resource. Look here for contemporary information that the corporate encyclopedias won’t touch."

Quon, Wynn. "The New Know-it-all." National Post, February 26, 2005. [63]
"It's as if a gang of hardy Amish barn-raisers ended up erecting the tallest skyscraper in the world...but Wikipedia is more than just the raising of a new barn, it's the tearing down of the old ones". [How the traditional encyclopedias face big trouble from Wikipedia: the "leaching factor"]

Behr, Rafael. "Every blog has its day." National Observer, February 27, 2005. [64]
"The best example yet of the capacity of the internet to coalesce into self-regulating networks is Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia written by whoever wants to go and edit it. It is not as authoritative as Britannica, and it gives disproportionate weight to transient phenomena. But it does give a reliable steer on most subjects. It is not anarchic, there is a hierarchy of more trusted writers who have earned their privileges over time. Editorial access to controversial entries - 'George Bush', 'Palestine', for example - is restricted to see off vandals. A South Korean online newspaper Ohmynews is compiled along similar principles. At this point journalists and compilers of encyclopedias roll their eyes. Their reaction is justified in so far as professionals hate to see a job done badly. But fear of competition plays a part."

Clay Shirky, (February 28, 2005). "First Two Laws of Commons-Based Peer Production". Many2Many [65]
"And I assume I am hardly alone in the academy. Hundreds, if not thousands of us must be getting papers this year with Wikipedia URLs in the footnotes, and despite the moral panic, the Wikipedia is a fine resource on a large number of subjects, and can and should be cited in those cases. There are articles, as danah has pointed out, where it would be far better to go to the primary sources, but that would be as true were a student to cite any encyclopedia. If someone cited the Wikipedia to discuss [Walter Benjamin’s] work, I’d send them back to the trenches, but I would also do that if they cited Encyclopedia Britannica.

"To borrow some Hemingway, this is how the academy will get used to Wikipedia — slowly, then all at once."
- Chin, Brian. "Wikipedia in the footnotes". March 01, 2005. [66]
- Danah Boyd, (January 8, 2005 - the dates are getting weird...). "On a Vetted Wikipedia, Reflexivity and Investment in Quality (a.k.a. more responses to Clay Shirky)". Many2Many [67]
  "In response to Clay, i definitely do not believe that Wikipedia should be ignored and i definitely do not believe that Britannica is better - just different. When i said that Wikipedia will never be an encyclopedia, i am definitely referencing the current definition (although being flexible on the fact the definition does state book form). Whether the definition will expand, who knows but i don’t think it matters. Both encyclopedias and Wikipedia are knowledge resources and they will always be different. If legitimacy requires a definitional change, i’m worried. Why does it have to be an encyclopedia? Why can’t it simply be Wikipedia?

In this (long) entry, i want to make 3 points:

- "1) A vetted Wikipedia can have complementary value;
  
  "2) Reflexivity would be of great value for entries that interpret (not necessarily for entries that are about empirical facts);
  
  "3) Authority has to do with knowledge, investment and risk."

2005 March

Krowne, Aaron. "The FUD based encyclopedia: Dismantling the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt aimed at Wikipedia and other free knowledge sources." Free Software. March 1, 2005. [68]
"In this article, I respond to Robert McHenry's anti-Wikipedia piece entitled 'The Faith-Based Encyclopedia.' I argue that McHenry's points are contradictory and incoherent and that his rhetoric is selective, dishonest and misleading. I also consider McHenry&'s points in the context of all Commons-Based Peer Production (CBPP), showing how they are part of a Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) campaign against CBPP. Further, I introduce some principles, which will help to explain why and how CBPP projects can succeed, and I discuss alternative ways they may be organized, which will address certain concerns."
"First Two Laws of Commons-Based Peer Production." Many 2 Many. February 27, 2005. [69] (note that time zone differences account for hat seems to be the posting of the response to the original article before the article itself)
Marson, Ingrid. "Wikipedia needs help to keep growing." ZDNet. March 1, 2005. [70]
"The team running Wikipedia has urged the open source development community to lend their support to help the encyclopaedia project grow and to combat Web bots that are damaging its content.

"In the opening talk at the FOSDEM conference in Brussels on Saturday, Wikipedia Foundation president Jimmy Wales urged the assembled audience of open source developers to get involved with the online encyclopaedia. He said Wikipedia has the physical resources to handle the extra traffic, but needs technical people to manage these servers."

Wired, 2 marzo 2005

Pink, Daniel. "The Book Stops Here." Wired. March 2, 2005.

Pink, Daniel. "The Book Stops Here". Pages: Cover - "Wikipedia: the self-organizing library of the future", 007, 124-129, 136, 139. [71]

This in-depth commentary is Wired magazine's first print article on Wikipedia. Pink attended the December meetup in New York as part of his research.

Da approfondire. --Christian (discussione) 07:18, 9 mar 2009 (CET)

Del Arte, Alonso. "Fusion: Although current, Wikipepedia [sic] not always reliable source of information." The South End. March 2, 2005. [72]
Surveys the views of Wikipedia by various professors who lecture at Wayne State University. The same issues as normal are raised: Some think it's OK to use for undergraduates, definitely not for postgraduate work, lack of proper academic peer review mechanisms issues of unbalanced and patchy content, questions the priorities of Wikipedia authors. Quotes from article:
"[History Professor Eric Ash] made up an example of a Web site on Charles Darwin written by Joe Smith.

"'I don't know who Joe Smith is. Joe Smith could be a fundamentalist who sees Charles Darwin as the Antichrist,' Ash speculated. Such points of view do occasionally get into Wikipedia. The history of the article on Charles Darwin shows a serious effort by several Wikipedia users to keep the article neutral in point of view."

"Ash recalled that one time, before giving a lecture on a novel by 19th century author Samuel Smiles, he turned to Wikipedia to see if he could find some supplemental information.

"Ash said, 'Wikipedia had one screen of information. I learned he had written other books' besides the one he was lecturing about."
"Dictionary of National Biography: $15,000, buggy -- better than Wikipedia?". March 6, 2005. BoingBoing. [73]
The latest salvo in the Wikipedia-versus-the-world wars: the new edition of the Oxford University Press Dictionary of National Biography—ringing in at nearly $15,000—is riddled with factual errors. If these errors had appeared in Wikipedia entries, its likely that they would have been fixed in short order -- and once they were discovered by the outraged experts quoted in this Observer article, they certainly would be fixed. ¿Quien es mas macho?

Terdiman, Daniel. "Wiki Becomes a Way of Life". March 8, 2005. Wired News. Article link
Wired Online has done a feature story about the most active Wikipedia users, based on old data. It profiles Charles Matthews, Stacey Greenstein, Derek Ramsey and his Rambot, Daniel Mayer, Bryan Derksen and Seth Ilys.
Slashdot covered this in [74].

Minow, Nell. "Help children learn critical thinking skills". March 9, 2005. Chicago Tribune [75].
"One reason Google is so popular is it uses a formula for ranking search results that is likely -- though not guaranteed -- to put the most reliable ones at the top. Google also gets points for putting its "sponsored links" -- sites that pay to be listed -- off to the side and labeling them clearly so that users can tell they are ads.

"But not all search engines play by those rules, and children need to know that. They also need to understand that no search engine guarantees the information it points to is factual or even unbiased.

"The same applies to some popular online reference sites like the Internet movie database at imdb.com, and http://en.wikipedia.org, an online encyclopedia. The entries in both are written and assembled by amateurs and volunteers -- which doesn't mean the entries are wrong, but it doesn't mean they are right, either.

" A good point of discussion with teens as well as younger children who use the Internet for research is how a Web site establishes credibility. One place to start: Look on a site's main page for a link labeled something like, 'about us.'

"On Wikipedia, the link 'About Wikipedia' is at the bottom of the home page. It takes readers to a detailed, annotated page that explains the Wikipedia project, among other things."

Kinzie, Susan. "Wiping Out the Blackboard". March 11, 2005; Page B01. The Washington Post. [76]
"Early e-mail lists, newsgroups and chat rooms were ephemeral, like a passing conversation, said Steve Jones, a communication professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Now computers and networks are fast enough that many people can share text, videos, sound and art and work on them together, he said, building a body of knowledge over time. Wikis, including interactive encyclopedia Wikipedia, have been around for several years but they're just on the cusp of becoming mainstream; as the technology improves, they're popping up in a few classrooms and offices, and people are finding all sorts of uses for them."

"Remixing the Fourth Estate". March 13, 200. AlterNet. [77]
"[Dan Gillmor] praised technological developments like the Wikipedia -- an online encyclopedia that anyone can change and update. Contrary to early criticism that the Wiki encourages biased speech or off-topic rants, it is actually a self-correcting phenomenon. For every opinion presented, there is a reader with the opposite opinion with the power to change the statement. What results, Gillmor argues, is the least-biased conversation, for the end result must be a mutually agreed-upon truth. Gillmor lauded our move toward a "remix culture," and summed up his point thusly: "eventually, grass roots media will be the norm."

Procter, Darryl. "Web gems". March 14, 2005. Rocky Mountain News. [78]
Listed under "Research".

Johnson, Steve. "'Old' media, bloggers square off at conference". March 14, 2005. Chicago Tribune [79]
" Among the more concrete suggestions participants offered traditional journalistic enterprises: make their news archives freely available, which would help their work show up on search engines and get linked to by other sites, instead of only offering them free for a couple of weeks, as is common practice; and consider making their Web sites more interactive, allowing for some form of reader comment and elaboration on the news stories, similar to the model established by Wikipedia, the free, online, openly edited encyclopedia."

Horton, Jane. "Keeping positive in the face of climate change". March 14, 2005. digital divide network [80].
"Since this software doesn’t permit us to collaboratively add to articles (unlike in wikipedia) I suggest that you add what helps you (if you feel so moved) as comments to this article so we can build up a communal resource together to help us from being overwhelmed."

Benfield, Chris. "Phoenix like comeback for crooner Tony". March 15, 2005. Yorkshire Post. [81]
"Christie only drops into Conisbrough nowadays to see his family. But he gets a mention as the town's most famous son in the on-line encylopaedia Wikipedia.

Richardson, Will. "Understanding Wikipedia". March 15, 2005. Ed-Tech Insider. [82]
If you're still trying to "get" what Wikipedia is all about, you might want to check out this extremely well done deconstruction of a Wikipedia entry done by Jon Udell.

Thompson, Bill. "Write Your Own Encyclopedia?". March 16, 2005. BBC. [83]
"Wikipedia is great for getting a general overview of a subject and for figuring out where else to look, and often a lot faster than just searching the whole web for the word you're interested in."

Frykholm, Daniel. "Web Design Hampers Mobile Internet, Pioneer Says". March 17, 2005. Reuters. [84]
Berners-Lee's original vision of the Web was as a resource for collaboration. He said that so far it had been "a big disappointment" in this respect, although exceptions such as "wikis" -- essentially interactive online note pads -- showed its potential. "Wikis in general are great examples of how people want to be creative and not just suck in information," he told the seminar, pointing to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia as the most advanced development in this area.

"Wikipedia nears half million article mark". March 17, 2005. The Inquirer [85]
"ONLINE ENCYCLOPAEDIA the Wiki is close to reaching half a million English articles online. The Wiki relies on volunteers and interested parties to add, edit and update articles, and has become a very useful resource since it was launched. According to its English page, here, there are currently 499,690 English articles on the resource. And it also has a news section which people can edit and add to as well. Lots of people would like to edit INQ articles for lots of different reasons. But you can't. OK?"

"Reference revolution" . March 18, 2005. News@nature.com [86]
Roxanne Khamsi interviews Wikipedia Jimmy Wales.

"Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales offers a whole new species of information online." Relationship of Wikispecies to Wikipedia discussed.

Stice, Carolyn. "A Man with a Wiki: An interview with Jimmy Wales." March 18, 2005. The Ester Republic. [87]
The founder of Wikipedia, Wiktionary, and other free-content online resources talks about the goals of the Wikimedia Foundation, and explains what the heck a wiki is.

"Move over, Google". March 20, 2005. pg. 14 Sunday Life (inset of the Australian Sunday Telegraph).
"The latest online phenomenon is the free encyclopedia Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org), which boasts more than 1.1 million entries and is growing by 7 per cent per month. Wikipedia is fast (splutter) and easy to use nd if you spot something you don't like, you can change it. That's because all entries are written and edited by members of the online community, creating a constantly evolving site. The democratic concept isn't exactly watertight, with debates raging over accuracy and some subjects being shut down but mostly it's a solid source of info on just about anything."

McHenry, Robert. "Knowledge in U.S.: I know I'm right and you're wrong". March 21, 2005. Chicago Tribune. [88]
A similar hyperbole surrounds such projects as the Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia open to all. The Wikipedia's apologists emphasize the great number of volunteers who have taken part in the project and the number of entries they have contributed. They emphasize also the communal nature of the undertaking, in which anyone with a better understanding of a subject, or a bigger ax to grind, can edit what someone else has created. Their prime article of faith is that this openness will inevitably lead to a high level of accuracy and quality.

Price, Gary. "Wikipedia Plus Dynamic Search Term Suggestions = WikiWax". March 21, 2005. Search Engine Watch. [89]
Surfwax has just launched its LookAhead search term suggestion technology combined with Wikipedia into a new site calledWikiWax. Over 600,000 Wikipedia index terms are listed with more than 2,000,000 LookAhead rotations available. Remember, you'll see LookAhead offering suggested entries prior to clicking the search button.

Bates, Mary Ellen. "Just the Facts, Please". March 22, 2005. Search Engine Watch. [90]>
Article that talks about answers.com and Wikipedia. Refers to Wikipedia as a source of information.

Matei, Sorin Adam. "The Internet, the water spring and Adrian Paunescu". March 22, 2005. Evenimentul Zilei online. [91]
Article originally in Romanian starts with a description of the The New Yorker's "On the Internet no-one knows you're a dog" cartoon, describes Wikipedia and mentions the accuracy problem. It then describes in detail a disputed article on Romanian poet Adrian Paunescu (ro:Adrian Păunescu):

"A user for the first time interested in this issue creates a biography and includes in it what he knows: Adrian Paunescu is a famous Romanian poet. Another elderly user would probably add that Paunescu was a poet close to the communist power. A fan of Flacara literary circle might erase this information, saying that Adrian Paunescu was a patriotic poet who contributed to the relaunching of "Horea's spear" song. Later on, a critic added the fact that Adrian Paunescu was a political chameleon after 1989. This contribution can also be erased, let's say, by a member of the former ruling Social Democrat Party (PSD), who includes the poet, again, among the brilliant minds of the nation. This wikipedia page isn't a joke, it really exists (http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_P%C4%83unescu). From it, the nationalist poet, deeply involved in the games of the communist power in the 1980s, appears as a disinterested patriot. He is presented as being persecuted by the communist-era political police Securitate and as a "supporter of the naturist medicine in the era of the advancement of chemistry". The secret of this positive biography? The last contributor of the biography of the bard from Birca was...the son of the poet, Andrei Paunescu." ...

"The wiki system perfectly embodies the drama of searching for information through the Internet. Although plenty and necessary, information isn't better or worse than it was its last user/creator. Internet is like a water spring. It is a quick way to quench your thirst. The problem is that you never know who was the last one who drank from it: a man or a dog."

Note: Since the publication of this article, the Adrian Paunescu article appears to have been extensively truncated and vandalised.

2005 April

Burnett, Thane. "Sounds of life, death." Toronto Sun. 1 April 2005. [92]
"Schiavo's end resonated quickly around the world. Within moments -- even as leaders walked to microphones -- the online encyclopedia Wikipedia was updated to reflect her final breath."

Sternstein, Aliya. "Wiki means fast". FCW.com. April 4, 2005. [93]
"The Wikipedia is a classic example. It is an online, self-correcting, self-evolving encyclopedia updated by a community of users, trusting the good intentions of the posters."

Brøndmo, Hans-Peter. "How Will Tags Color the Web?" ClickZ Network. April 4, 2005. [94]
"Wikipedia, likewise, has a core group of about 500 users worldwide who constitute a highly active community. They monitor content changes and submissions for accuracy and adherence to the Wikipedia terms. They edit submissions, categorize content, and generally constitute Wikipedia's "editorial staff"."

Morgan, Fiona, and others. "Our Favorite Geeks." Independent Weekly. April 6, 2005.[95]
Profile of Seth Ilys based on his Wikipedia contributions.

Slashdot. April 8, 2005 [96]
Readers of Microsoft's Encarta encyclopedia can now propose edits to articles. Edits will be approved and copyedited by Encarta staff.

Jeffery, Simon. "Wikipedia - first with the news". The Guardian. April 12, 2005. [97]
Reports that Wikipedia's article on Andrea Dworkin correctly noted her death over 24 hours before the mainstream media, " ... Wikipedia the sole supporting published source, breaking the news in its own quiet and understated manner. ..."

The Associated Press. "Encarta encyclopedia tests edit system". Business Week. April 13, 2005.[98]
"This is in contrast to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, which lets anyone instantaneously make changes, even delete entries, regardless of whether that person has any expertise in the subject. [...] 'The truth of the matter is, we have 42,000 articles in Encarta and somewhere around 60 million words, so even if I had a staff of 1,000 editors we wouldn't be able to look at all of the content all the time,' Alt said."

Mackintosh, Hamish. "Talk Time". The Guardian. April 14, 2005. [99]
Interview with Jimmy Wales. "Once, everyone was excited about the new medium of the net. People talked about free knowledge and the ability to share ideas but then it seemed to be all about pop-up ads and porn spam. We came on to the scene when people were getting disillusioned. Hopefully they thought it was an attempt to create something positive."

BBC News Online. "Hitchhiker's Guide in your pocket". April 15, 2005. [100]
"In some respects the way that the H2G2 website was put together pre-figures the idea of the wikipedia [sic], an online encyclopedia, that is also written, edited and checked by ordinary web users."

Hoffman, Allan. "Note to Web monks: Try surfing for a wiki." The Star-Ledger. April 17, 2005. [101]
"To get a sense of what a wiki really is, you will need to visit one. Start at Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org), a popular, freely available encyclopedia. Wikipedia might look like any other Web-based resource, with brief items brimming with links to other references. Wikipedia has more than 525,000 entries in English on just about any topic imaginable. The entry on wiki provides the source of the quirky name — a Hawaiian term meaning quick. But look under the covers of Wikipedia, and you will discover how easy it is to edit the articles..." (text continues at article)

Cara, Anna. "If 'Wikipedians' don't like this article, they'll change it" Atlanta Journal-Constitution. April 17, 2005.
"In an interview with Wikipedia's latest newsletter, Stanford University professor Lawrence Lessig simply says, 'Wikipedia is jazz.'"

slashdot.org, 18 aprile 2005

{{
 #if:Sanger
 |{{
    #if: 
    |[[ |Sanger{{
       #if: Larry
       |, Larry
     }}]]
    |Sanger{{
       #if: Larry
       |, Larry
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: 
       |; 
       |{{#if:| & |; }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |[[ |{{
          #if: 
          |, 
        }}]]
       |{{
          #if: 
          |, 
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |{{
          #if: 
          |; 
          |{{#if:| & |; }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |[[ |{{
             #if: 
             |, 
           }}]]
          |{{
             #if: 
             |, 
           }}
        }}{{
          #if:
          |{{
             #if: 
             |; 
             |{{#if:| & |; }}
           }}{{
             #if: 
             |[[ |{{
                #if: 
                |, 
              }}]]
             |{{
                #if: 
                |, 
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             |{{
                #if: 
                |; 
                |{{#if:| & |; }}
              }}{{
                #if: 
                |[[ |{{
                   #if: 
                   |, 
                 }}]]
                |{{
                   #if: 
                   |, 
                 }}
              }}{{
                #if:
                |{{
                   #if: 
                   |; 
                   |{{#if:| & |; }}
                 }}{{
                   #if: 
                   |[[ |{{
                      #if: 
                      |, 
                    }}]]
                   |{{
                      #if: 
                      |, 
                    }}
                 }}{{
                   #if:
                   |{{
                      #if: 
                      |; 
                      |{{#if:| & |; }}
                    }}{{
                      #if: 
                      |[[ |{{
                         #if: 
                         |, 
                       }}]]
                      |{{
                         #if: 
                         |, 
                       }}
                    }}{{
                      #if:
                      |{{
                         #if: 
                         |; 
                         |{{#if:| & |; }}
                       }}{{
                         #if: 
                         |[[ |{{
                            #if: 
                            |, 
                          }}]]
                         |{{
                            #if: 
                            |, 
                          }}
                       }}{{
                         #if:
                         |;  et al.
                       }}
                    }}
                 }}
              }}
           }}
        }}
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{#if:April 18, 2005|April 18, 2005|  }}
    | ({{#if:April 18, 2005|April 18, 2005|  }}){{
      #if:
    | [{{{YearNote}}}]
    }}
  }}
 |{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: 
       |[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}]]
       |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |; {{
          #if: 
          |[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}]]
          |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |;  {{
             #if: 
             |[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}]]
             |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             | et al.
           }}
        }}
      }}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
       #if: {{#if:April 18, 2005|April 18, 2005|  }}
       | ({{#if:April 18, 2005|April 18, 2005|  }})
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
 |{{
    #if:Sanger 
    |.  
  }}{{#if: {{
          #if: 
          |
          |{{
             #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
             |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
             |{{
                #if: 
                |http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
              }}
           }} 
        }} 
 | [{{
          #if: 
          |
          |{{
             #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
             |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
             |{{
                #if: 
                |http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
              }}
           }} 
        }} {{
          #if: SourceForge
          |{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
          |"{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}"
        }}] 
 | {{
          #if: SourceForge
          |{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
          |"{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}"
        }}

}} }}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #ifeq:  | 
    |
    |{{
       #if: Sanger{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}SourceForge
       |. written at 
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #if: Sanger
    |. {{
       #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
       |in 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}]]
       |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}}}{{
       #if: 
       |; {{
          #if: 
          |[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}]]
          |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |; {{
             #if: 
             |[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}]]
             |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             | et al.
           }}
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
       |
       |. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: SourceForge
 |{{
    #if: Sanger
    |. }}{{
    #if: {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
    |"{{#if: {{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                | {{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                   }} 
                 
              }}
           }} 
 | [{{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                | {{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                   }} 
                 
              }}
           }} {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}] 
 | {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}

}}"}} }}{{

#if: 
  |  (in )
}}{{#if:
  | ()
}}{{
  #if: SourceForge|{{
      #if:{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}{{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}|. }}SourceForge{{
    #if: 
    |. 
  }}{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: Slashdot
       | (: Slashdot)
       | ()
     }}
    |{{
       #if: Slashdot
       | (Slashdot)
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: 
    | '{{
       #if: 
       | ()
     }}
    |{{
       #if: 
       | ()
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
    |:  {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
  }}
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
    |{{
       #if: Sanger{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}SourceForge
       |. 
     }}{{#if: {{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                |{{ 
                   #if:  
                   |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=       
                 }}
              }}
           }} 
 | [{{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                |{{ 
                   #if:  
                   |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=       
                 }}
              }}
           }} {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}] 
 | {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}

}}}}{{

       #if: 
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |. '
     }}{{
       #if:  
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       | ( ed.)
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: Slashdot
       |{{
          #if: 
          |:
          |.
        }} Slashdot
     }}
  }}{{
 #if: Sanger
 |
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:April 18, 2005|April 18, 2005|  }}
    |. {{#if:April 18, 2005|April 18, 2005|  }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #ifeq:  | {{#if:April 18, 2005|April 18, 2005|  }}
    |
    |{{
       #if: 
       |{{
          #if: Sanger
          |. 
          | (published )
        }}
       |{{
          #if: SourceForge
          |. 
          | (published )
        }}
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: SourceForge
 |
 |{{
    #if: {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
    |. {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
  }}

}}{{

if:

 |. doi:{{#if:  
    |  (inactive ) {{#ifeq:  |  | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y |  }}]] }}
    | 
   }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |.

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. ISBN

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. ISSN [102]

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. OCLC [103]

}}{{

 #if:  
 |. PMID

}}{{

 #if:  
 |{{#if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
    |. PMC: [104]
  }}

}}{{

 #if:  
 |. Bibcode: [105]

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. {{{Archive}}}
 |{{
   #if:{{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9}}
   |. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9}} 
 | [{{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9}} the original] 
 | the original

}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{

     #if:
     | on 
     |. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}} 
     }}
   |{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir}}
    |. {{
                                     #if: 
                                     |
                                     |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
                                   }}
    |. {{
             #if: 
             |
             |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213&tid=95&tid=149&tid=9
           }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
   #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
     #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
       
     }}
   }}
  }}
    | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
   #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
     #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
       
     }}
   }}
  }}
    }}

}}{{#if:

 |. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}

}}{{#if:

 |  ()

}}{{#if:

 |.  ""

}}{{#if:||.}}

La seconda parte è seguita il giorno dopo. --Christian (discussione) 03:19, 11 mar 2009 (CET)

slashdot.org, 19 aprile 2005

{{
 #if:Sanger
 |{{
    #if: 
    |[[ |Sanger{{
       #if: Larry
       |, Larry
     }}]]
    |Sanger{{
       #if: Larry
       |, Larry
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: 
       |; 
       |{{#if:| & |; }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |[[ |{{
          #if: 
          |, 
        }}]]
       |{{
          #if: 
          |, 
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |{{
          #if: 
          |; 
          |{{#if:| & |; }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |[[ |{{
             #if: 
             |, 
           }}]]
          |{{
             #if: 
             |, 
           }}
        }}{{
          #if:
          |{{
             #if: 
             |; 
             |{{#if:| & |; }}
           }}{{
             #if: 
             |[[ |{{
                #if: 
                |, 
              }}]]
             |{{
                #if: 
                |, 
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             |{{
                #if: 
                |; 
                |{{#if:| & |; }}
              }}{{
                #if: 
                |[[ |{{
                   #if: 
                   |, 
                 }}]]
                |{{
                   #if: 
                   |, 
                 }}
              }}{{
                #if:
                |{{
                   #if: 
                   |; 
                   |{{#if:| & |; }}
                 }}{{
                   #if: 
                   |[[ |{{
                      #if: 
                      |, 
                    }}]]
                   |{{
                      #if: 
                      |, 
                    }}
                 }}{{
                   #if:
                   |{{
                      #if: 
                      |; 
                      |{{#if:| & |; }}
                    }}{{
                      #if: 
                      |[[ |{{
                         #if: 
                         |, 
                       }}]]
                      |{{
                         #if: 
                         |, 
                       }}
                    }}{{
                      #if:
                      |{{
                         #if: 
                         |; 
                         |{{#if:| & |; }}
                       }}{{
                         #if: 
                         |[[ |{{
                            #if: 
                            |, 
                          }}]]
                         |{{
                            #if: 
                            |, 
                          }}
                       }}{{
                         #if:
                         |;  et al.
                       }}
                    }}
                 }}
              }}
           }}
        }}
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{#if:April 19, 2005|April 19, 2005|  }}
    | ({{#if:April 19, 2005|April 19, 2005|  }}){{
      #if:
    | [{{{YearNote}}}]
    }}
  }}
 |{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: 
       |[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}]]
       |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |; {{
          #if: 
          |[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}]]
          |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |;  {{
             #if: 
             |[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}]]
             |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             | et al.
           }}
        }}
      }}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
       #if: {{#if:April 19, 2005|April 19, 2005|  }}
       | ({{#if:April 19, 2005|April 19, 2005|  }})
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
 |{{
    #if:Sanger 
    |.  
  }}{{#if: {{
          #if: 
          |
          |{{
             #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
             |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
             |{{
                #if: 
                |http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
              }}
           }} 
        }} 
 | [{{
          #if: 
          |
          |{{
             #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
             |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
             |{{
                #if: 
                |http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
              }}
           }} 
        }} {{
          #if: SourceForge
          |{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
          |"{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}"
        }}] 
 | {{
          #if: SourceForge
          |{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
          |"{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}"
        }}

}} }}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #ifeq:  | 
    |
    |{{
       #if: Sanger{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}SourceForge
       |. written at 
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #if: Sanger
    |. {{
       #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
       |in 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}]]
       |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
          #if: 
          |, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
        }}}}{{
       #if: 
       |; {{
          #if: 
          |[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}]]
          |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
             #if: 
             |, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
           }}
        }}{{
          #if: 
          |; {{
             #if: 
             |[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}]]
             |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
                #if: 
                |, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
              }}
           }}{{
             #if:
             | et al.
           }}
        }}
     }}{{
       #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
       |
       |. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: SourceForge
 |{{
    #if: Sanger
    |. }}{{
    #if: {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
    |"{{#if: {{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                | {{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                   }} 
                 
              }}
           }} 
 | [{{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                | {{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                   }} 
                 
              }}
           }} {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}] 
 | {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}

}}"}} }}{{

#if: 
  |  (in )
}}{{#if:
  | ()
}}{{
  #if: SourceForge|{{
      #if:{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}{{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}|. }}SourceForge{{
    #if: 
    |. 
  }}{{
    #if: 
    |{{
       #if: Slashdot
       | (: Slashdot)
       | ()
     }}
    |{{
       #if: Slashdot
       | (Slashdot)
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: 
    | '{{
       #if: 
       | ()
     }}
    |{{
       #if: 
       | ()
     }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
    |:  {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
  }}
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
    |{{
       #if: Sanger{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}SourceForge
       |. 
     }}{{#if: {{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                |{{ 
                   #if:  
                   |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=       
                 }}
              }}
           }} 
 | [{{
             #if: {{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
             |{{
                #if: 
                |{{
                   #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                   |{{ 
                      #if:  
                      |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
                    }} 
                 }}
              }}
             |{{
                #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                |{{ 
                   #if:  
                   |  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=       
                 }}
              }}
           }} {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}] 
 | {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}

}}}}{{

       #if: 
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |. '
     }}{{
       #if:  
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: 
       | ( ed.)
     }}{{
       #if: 
       |. 
     }}{{
       #if: Slashdot
       |{{
          #if: 
          |:
          |.
        }} Slashdot
     }}
  }}{{
 #if: Sanger
 |
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:April 19, 2005|April 19, 2005|  }}
    |. {{#if:April 19, 2005|April 19, 2005|  }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |{{
    #ifeq:  | {{#if:April 19, 2005|April 19, 2005|  }}
    |
    |{{
       #if: 
       |{{
          #if: Sanger
          |. 
          | (published )
        }}
       |{{
          #if: SourceForge
          |. 
          | (published )
        }}
     }}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: SourceForge
 |
 |{{
    #if: {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
    |. {{
          #if: 
          |p. {{{page}}}
          |{{
             #if: 
             |pp. {{{pages}}}
             |
           }}
        }}
  }}

}}{{

if:

 |. doi:{{#if:  
    |  (inactive ) {{#ifeq:  |  | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y |  }}]] }}
    | 
   }}

}}{{

 #if: 
 |.

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. ISBN

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. ISSN [106]

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. OCLC [107]

}}{{

 #if:  
 |. PMID

}}{{

 #if:  
 |{{#if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
    |. PMC: [108]
  }}

}}{{

 #if:  
 |. Bibcode: [109]

}}{{

 #if: 
 |. {{{Archive}}}
 |{{
   #if:{{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95}}
   |. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95}} 
 | [{{#if:|http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95}} the original] 
 | the original

}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{

     #if:
     | on 
     |. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}} 
     }}
   |{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
  }}

}}{{

 #if: http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
 |{{
    #if: {{#if:SourceForge|The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}{{#if:SourceForge||The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia, Part II}}
    |. {{
                                     #if: 
                                     |
                                     |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
                                   }}
    |. {{
             #if: 
             |
             |http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205&tid=95
           }}
  }}{{
    #if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
   #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
     #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
       
     }}
   }}
  }}
    | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
   #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
     #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
       
     }}
   }}
  }}
    }}

}}{{#if:

 |. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}

}}{{#if:

 |  ()

}}{{#if:

 |.  ""

}}{{#if:||.}}

La prima parte il giorno prima. --Christian (discussione) 03:19, 11 mar 2009 (CET)

"Web quickly spreads word of new pope". Reuters. April 19, 2005. [110]
"The election spurred the posting of special alert banners on major news network sites including ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX and NBC. The entry for Ratzinger on Wikipedia had already been updated to reflect his new title. The community-based Web encyclopedia also was quick to post word of the death of Terri Schiavo in March." Links are as shown in quotation.

Silverman, Dwight. "Sudden info on the pope". Houston Chronicle. April 20, 2005. [111]
"For those who don't know, the Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is developed by the online community. Anyone is free to submit or revise an article.

"You'd think it would be chaotic, but it actually works well — and quickly..."
Article continues; see full text for more. Links are as shown in article.

"The future of journalism: Yesterday's papers". The Economist. April 21, 2005. [112]
"Wikis are collaborative web pages that allow readers to edit and contribute. This, to digital immigrants, may sound like a recipe for anarchic chaos, until they visit, for instance, wikipedia.org, an online encyclopaedia that is growing dramatically richer by the day through exactly this spontaneous (and surprisingly orderly) collaboration among strangers." Links to Wikipedia as shown.

Rhymer, Rigby. "The advent of the online whiteboard: COLLABORATIVE SOFTWARE: Companies around the world are waking up to the considerable attractions of interactive wiki pages". Financial Times (London). April 22, 2005.
"Wikipedia, the web's largest encyclopaedia and the best known example of a wiki"

"BBC Launches Real-Life 'Hitchhiker's Guide'" Adam Pasick for Reuters. [113]
"Wikipedia allows anyone to make changes to entries but relies on a final review by a core team of about 1,000 users. Similarly, the BBC has the final say over what appears on H2G2, according to Ashley Highfield, Director of BBC New Media & Technology."

Mitra, Kushan. "Just how did a website with a quaint sounding prefix (it's Hawaiian, duh!) establish the concept of an online democracy? And why did a multi-millionaire one-time derivatives trader become its benevolent dictator?". Business Today (India). April 24, 2005.
"Wikipedia is nothing short of a revolution."

Foremski, Tom. "Notes from Software 2005: Lunch with the Swami of the enterprise software sector...". SiliconValleyWatcher. April 26, 2005. [114]
"I sat with MR at lunch, (he is a big SiliconValleyWatcher fan BTW). Here are some notes from my chat with the 'swami of the software sector'. (MR, I hope it’s not offensive to call you swami; I did wikipedia it…!)" (This marks the first time this user at least has seen "Wikipedia" used as a verb.)

Hoffman, Allan. "Just Browsing'. New Orleans Times-Picayune. April 27, 2005.
"Wikipedia is an astonishing resource"

Williams, Derek. "Wikipedia". Newsletter of American Mensa COM SIG. April 27, 2005.
Discusses the idea behind Wikipedia, it's growth, and mentions and replies to common criticisms.

Jdd, Damon D. "Geocollaboration using Peer-Peer GIS". Directions Magazine. April 28, 2005. [115]
"The web site, Wikipedia, is an encyclopedia written collaboratively by many of its readers. It illustrates an interesting level of collaboration at the less interactive, open community side of the spectrum. Wikipedia defines collaboration as follows." Article then quotes first paragraph of Collaboration. Article links to main page and article as shown.

"The Saj of Tao | Denouement". The Tufts Daily. April 28, 2005. [116].
"Wikipedia.org, my dearest friend. Not a credible source to cite on research papers, I discovered, but if I'm in a bind and need to know who made the steam engine efficient enough to jumpstart the creation of an effective steam-powered cargo-carrying industry (James Watt) for the sole purpose of setting up a joke a few lines later about a fat stupid President opening up ANWR to oil-drilling at the turn of the last century, I know where to go."

Dubey, Chris. "Online Encyclopedia Offers Free Help". The University of Hartford Informer. April 28, 2005. [117]
"Where on the Internet can you find optimized information on such diverse topics as hyperbolic Ann Coulter quotes, the history of auto racing and the Usenet flame war called the Meow Wars? No, it isn't Google I'm talking about. It's Wikipedia, a Web-based, free-content encyclopedia, written collaboratively by volunteers..." Remainder of article is about Wikipedia.

Cody, Nabours. "Life, the universe and everything". The UCSD Guardian. April 29, 2005. [118].
"Much of the book’s best humor remains in the movie, from the doomed-but-philosophizing sperm whale (perhaps the book’s finest moment) to the excerpts from the Guide itself (sort of the Wikipedia of the universe)."

"China's old foes seek an end to conflict". The Economist. April 29, 2005. [119]
"Wikipedia has background information on the civil war." – sidebar reference in an article on the meeting between Communist Party of China leader Hu Jintao and Kuomintang leader Lien Chan.

Hoff, Rob. "REALLY Local Content". Business Week. April 29, 2005. [120]
"Of course, this kind of thing would depend on lots of people contributing voluntarily, but Craigslist, Wikipedia, and other volunteer sites prove that's not an insurmountable barrier." Links to Wikipedia as shown.

Rowse, Darren. "A Blogging Perspective OS X Tiger". WebProNews. April 30, 2005. [121].
"Dashboard - one of the main things that Apple have been selling this upgrade with is the new Dashboard feature which allows users to download desktop widgets. At the click of a button these widgets appear on your screen giving you up to date information on a variety of topics - ranging from stock prices, weather, world time, dictionary, calculator, wikipedia look up, mini rss reader."

Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2005gen-apr

Indice

2005 January

National Business Review. January 4, 2005

Wired News. January 10, 2005

The Triangle. January 14, 2005

Edit War su Perverted-Justice.com

2005 February

2005 March

Wired, 2 marzo 2005

2005 April

slashdot.org, 18 aprile 2005

slashdot.org, 19 aprile 2005

Menu di navigazione

Strumenti personali

Namespace

Varianti

Visite

Altro

Ricerca

Cantiere

Navigazione

videoGuide

collegamenti esterni

Strumenti