<analytics uacct="UA-6089322-1" ></analytics>
Wikipedia - Press Coverage/2001-2003
Da Cantiere.
{{#ifexpr: 0 = 1|
}}
{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|<h{{{livello}}} style="font-size:100%;border:0;margin:0;padding:0;color:inherit;text-align:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">}}WikiGuide{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|</h{{{livello}}}>}}
{{#if:Template:WikiGuide|}}
{{#if:|
| {{#if:|Copione WikiGuide: Wikipedia · Commons · Wikisource · Wikiquote
Organizzazione: Progetto · Portineria · Gruppo su Facebook
Organizzazione: Progetto · Portineria · Gruppo su Facebook
[[|]]
}}
[[Immagine:{{{sfondo}}}|center]]
}}
|
Copione WikiGuide: Wikipedia · Commons · Wikisource · Wikiquote |
[[|]]
{{#ifexpr: 0 = 1|
{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|<h{{{livello}}} style="font-size:100%;border:0;margin:0;padding:0;color:inherit;text-align:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">}}Press Coverage{{#ifexpr: 0 >1|</h{{{livello}}}>}}
{{#if:Template:Press Coverage|}}
{{#if:|
| {{#if:|Unsorted: · 2001-2003 · 2004: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2005: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2006: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic ·
Sorted: The Register
2007: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2008: gen-apr/mag-ago/set-dic · 2009 · Scientific articles
Sorted: The Register
[[|]]
}}
[[Immagine:{{{sfondo}}}|center]]
}}
}}
Indice
- 1 2001
- 2 2002
- 3 2003
- 3.1 Wired, 28 gennaio 2003
- 3.2 BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003
- 3.3 BMJ, 26 April 2003
- 3.4 EContent Magazine, 23 aprile 2003
- 3.5 PC Magazine, June 6, 2003
- 3.6 National Public Radio, July 21, 2003
- 3.7 CNN, 4 agosto 2003
- 3.8 Time, 12 agosto 2003
- 3.9 Science, September 5, 2003
- 3.10 MIT, October 1 2003
- 3.11 Wired, October 15 2003
- 3.12 MS-Mobiles, 19 November 2003
2001
{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://www.roblimo.com/
|[[http://www.roblimo.com/ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; et al.
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:Mar 05, 2001|Mar 05, 2001| }}
| ({{#if:Mar 05, 2001|Mar 05, 2001| }}){{
#if:
| [{{{YearNote}}}]
}}
}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
#if: {{#if:Mar 05, 2001|Mar 05, 2001| }}
| ({{#if:Mar 05, 2001|Mar 05, 2001| }})
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|{{
#if:
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{
#if: Slashdot
|{{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|"{{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}"
}}]
| {{
#if: Slashdot
|{{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|"{{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}"
}}
}} }}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: |
|
|{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}Slashdot
|. written at
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|. {{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|in
}}{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|
|. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: Slashdot
|{{
#if:
|. }}{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|"{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
| {{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
| {{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}]
| {{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
}}"}} }}{{
#if:
| (in )
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{
#if: Slashdot|{{
#if:{{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}{{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}|. }}Slashdot{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: SourceForge, Inc.
| (: SourceForge, Inc.)
| ()
}}
|{{
#if: SourceForge, Inc.
| (SourceForge, Inc.)
}}
}}{{
#if:
| '{{
#if:
| ()
}}
|{{
#if:
| ()
}}
}}{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p.
|{{
#if:
|pp.
|
}}
}}
|: {{
#if:
|p.
|{{
#if:
|pp.
|
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}Slashdot
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}]
| {{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|. '
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
| ( ed.)
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if: SourceForge, Inc.
|{{
#if:
|:
|.
}} SourceForge, Inc.
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: {{#if:Mar 05, 2001|Mar 05, 2001| }}
|. {{#if:Mar 05, 2001|Mar 05, 2001| }}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: | {{#if:Mar 05, 2001|Mar 05, 2001| }}
|
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|.
| (published )
}}
|{{
#if: Slashdot
|.
| (published )
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: Slashdot
|
|{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p.
|{{
#if:
|pp.
|
}}
}}
|. {{
#if:
|p.
|{{
#if:
|pp.
|
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
- if:
|. doi:{{#if: | (inactive ) {{#ifeq: | | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y | }}]] }} | }}
}}{{
#if: |.
}}{{
#if: |. ISBN
}}{{
#if: |. ISSN [1]
}}{{
#if: |. OCLC [2]
}}{{
#if: |. PMID
}}{{
#if:
|{{#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99
|. PMC: [3]
}}
}}{{
#if: |. Bibcode: [4]
}}{{
#if:
|. {{{Archive}}}
|{{
#if:{{#if:|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99}}
|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99}}
| [{{#if:|http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99}} the original]
| the original
}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{
#if:
| on
|. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}}
}}
|{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
}}
}}{{
#if: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99 |{{ #if: {{#if:Slashdot|Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}}{{#if:Slashdot||Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer}} |. {{ #if: | |http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99 }} |. {{ #if: | |http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/03/02/1422244&tid=99 }} }}{{ #if: {{#if:2009-03-24|2009-03-24|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2009-03-24|2009-03-24|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} }}
}}{{#if:
|. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{#if:
|. ""
}}{{#if:||.}}
- L'articolo è principalmente un'intervista al Hart, del progetto gutemberg. Niente di particolarmente rilevante, se non che è una delle prime volte che si parla di WP. --Christian (discussione) 23:15, 23 mar 2009 (CET)
Everything2 Hits One Million Nodes, March 29, 2001.
- Niente di rilevante, se non che è una delle prime volte che si parla di WP.. --Christian (discussione) 23:19, 23 mar 2009 (CET)
Kuro5hin 25.7.2001
Kuro5hin 2001/07/26 Britannica or Nupedia? The Future of Free Encyclopedias (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)
Britannica
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
«"The economics of the all-free model has changed," said Britannica spokesman Tom Panelas says in the AP story. Gone are the halcyon days of free content.
Au contraire--that's only what Britannica wants you to think. The grandest days of free content have not yet begun. Britannica and other proprietary encyclopedias will be hopelessly obsolete within ten years--small, out-of-date, and generally irrelevant--by comparison with Nupedia, Wikipedia, and the many other non-proprietary reference works that are being and will be developed. »
|
|
«Il portavoce della Britannica aveva annunciato in quei giorni che il modello economico del "tutto gratis" stava cambiando. Sanger invece sosteneva che invece dovevano ancora venire spingendosi addirittura ad ipotizzare che di lì a dieci anni le enciclopedie proprietarie come la Britannica sarebbero diventate obsolete: "piccole, datate e generalmente irrilevanti"<ref>Kuro5hin 2001/07/26 Britannica or Nupedia? The Future of Free Encyclopedias (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«"The economics of the all-free model has changed," said Britannica spokesman Tom Panelas says in the AP story. Gone are the halcyon days of free content.
Au contraire--that's only what Britannica wants you to think. The grandest days of free content have not yet begun. Britannica and other proprietary encyclopedias will be hopelessly obsolete within ten years--small, out-of-date, and generally irrelevant--by comparison with Nupedia, Wikipedia, and the many other non-proprietary reference works that are being and will be developed. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Ragioni della licenza
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«This means, as you no doubt already know, that anyone may use their content, for nonprofit or for-profit purposes, provided they link back to the content's source. It also means that the content can be developed further by other parties. Someone who releases an article under an open content license does so in order to guarantee that the article remains free to the public. This guarantee of freedom is a strong motivation to work on a free encyclopedia.
Moreover, if scholars concentrate their forces in building an open content encyclopedia, they will be fired by a further motive: there is considerable value in the collaboration that can be found in a general encyclopedia project and in the uniformity and high quality of the results. This value cannot be found in as high a degree in the activities of each writer posting content independently. »
|
|
«Nell'articolo Sanger spiega che cosa significa la licenza GNU FDL: chiunque può usarne il contenuto, anche per scopi commerciali, a condizione di indicare la fonte del contenuto. Inoltre il contenuto può essere sviluppato ulteriormente da altri. Sanger spiega che chi rilascia un articolo con questo tipo di licenza lo fa per garantire che l'articolo rimanga libero al pubblico. Questa garanzia di libertà è una forte motivazione per lavorare su un'enciclopedia libera. Ma esiste anche un'altra ragione importante per partecipare: l'incredibile forza della collaborazione e l'uniformità e l'alta qualità del risultato, che non può essere raggiunto attraverso la somma di lavori individuali.<ref>Kuro5hin 2001/07/26 Britannica or Nupedia? The Future of Free Encyclopedias (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«This means, as you no doubt already know, that anyone may use their content, for nonprofit or for-profit purposes, provided they link back to the content's source. It also means that the content can be developed further by other parties. Someone who releases an article under an open content license does so in order to guarantee that the article remains free to the public. This guarantee of freedom is a strong motivation to work on a free encyclopedia.
Moreover, if scholars concentrate their forces in building an open content encyclopedia, they will be fired by a further motive: there is considerable value in the collaboration that can be found in a general encyclopedia project and in the uniformity and high quality of the results. This value cannot be found in as high a degree in the activities of each writer posting content independently. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Primi passi
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«contributing articles to Wikipedia is easy, as is editing other people's articles. There is naturally little motivation to make substantive edits to articles on subjects about which one knows nothing, and mistakes are often caught and made a public spectacle. So experts are respected and deferred to, which encourages and motivates the experts--thus the increasing level of expertise on the website. Moreover, Wikipedians edit each other's stuff, so they feel a sense of collective purpose, responsibility, and camaraderie, which is yet another motivation to participate. »
|
|
«Sanger spiega inoltre come sia semplice contribuire a Wikipedia e editare le voci scritte da altri. Chiaramente non è naturale intervenire su temi che non si conoscono. Gli errori sono scoperti in fretta. Gli esperti sono rispettati E XXXXXXXXXXXX. Inoltre i Wikipediani, correggendosi l'un l'altro, percepiscono un senso di scopo comune, di responsabilità, di cameratismo, che sono altre ragioni per cui partecipare.<ref>Kuro5hin 2001/07/26 Britannica or Nupedia? The Future of Free Encyclopedias (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«contributing articles to Wikipedia is easy, as is editing other people's articles. There is naturally little motivation to make substantive edits to articles on subjects about which one knows nothing, and mistakes are often caught and made a public spectacle. So experts are respected and deferred to, which encourages and motivates the experts--thus the increasing level of expertise on the website. Moreover, Wikipedians edit each other's stuff, so they feel a sense of collective purpose, responsibility, and camaraderie, which is yet another motivation to participate. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Brilliant Prose
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«There is a page on Wikipedia called "brilliant prose" in which Wikipedia members praise each other for really superlative work. The articles on that page--and that is only a selection of the best work, not all of it--are at or near the level of quality that you would find in an proprietary encyclopedia. Out of the thousands of Wikipedia articles, there are hundreds of articles that are of this level of quality. All of the articles tend to grow in level of quality, as well--to paraphrase Linus Torvalds, "Given enough eyeballs, all typos, factual errors, and other errors of content are shallow." »
|
|
«A luglio 2001 esiste già una pagina denominata "Brilliant Prose", in cui i membri di Wikipedia si fanno i complimenti per le voci scritte particolarmente bene. Gli articoli segnalati (fino a quel momento qualche centinaio) sono praticamente al livello di quelli delle enciclopedie proprietarie. Man mano che passa il tempo gli articoli migliorano. Parafrasando Linus Torvalds "Dati sufficienti occhi, tutti gli errori vengono scoperti".<ref>Kuro5hin 2001/07/26 Britannica or Nupedia? The Future of Free Encyclopedias (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«There is a page on Wikipedia called "brilliant prose" in which Wikipedia members praise each other for really superlative work. The articles on that page--and that is only a selection of the best work, not all of it--are at or near the level of quality that you would find in an proprietary encyclopedia. Out of the thousands of Wikipedia articles, there are hundreds of articles that are of this level of quality. All of the articles tend to grow in level of quality, as well--to paraphrase Linus Torvalds, "Given enough eyeballs, all typos, factual errors, and other errors of content are shallow." »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Previsioni di Sanger!
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Suppose that, as is perfectly possible, Wikipedia continues producing articles at a rate of 1,000 per month. In seven years, it would have 84,000 articles.»
|
|
«Sanger fa inoltre questa proiezione: se Wikipedia continua a produrre articoli al ritmo di 1000 al mese, in sette anni avrà prodotto 84'000 articoli.<ref>Kuro5hin 2001/07/26 Britannica or Nupedia? The Future of Free Encyclopedias (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Suppose that, as is perfectly possible, Wikipedia continues producing articles at a rate of 1,000 per month. In seven years, it would have 84,000 articles.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Può fornire l'occasione per parlare abbastanza presto nella narrazione dei "numeri" attuali di Wikipedia.
- --Christian (discussione) 02:42, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
- Si, mi piace come idea. E' talmente al di sotto delle aspettative che va citata. Altra conferma che nessuno si aspettava un successo tale. --Andrea (discussione) 15:29, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
Sun Media syndicated "netelligence" column by Sandy McMurray (printed in the London Free Press, Calgary Sun, and Toronto Sun 2001/08/15, Edmonton Sun 2001/08/16)--Christian (discussione) 18:10, 16 feb 2009 (CET)-
Wales on Sunday 2001/08/26 Knowledge at your fingertips
- Non trovato. --Christian (discussione) 22:43, 21 feb 2009 (CET)
-
Irish News 2001/08/27 The information is at your fingertips - but for a price
- Non trovato. --Christian (discussione) 22:43, 21 feb 2009 (CET)
MIT Technology Review 2001/09/04
MIT Technology Review 2001/09/04 Free the Encyclopedias!
Investimento di Wales in WP
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Wales, who is founder and CEO of San Diego-based Web portal Bomis, has spent about $150,000 of his own money developing Wikipedia. Technically, Wikipedia is owned by Bomis, but Wales and Sanger plan to set up a nonprofit to run the Web-based encyclopedia.»
|
|
«Wales dichiara di aver speso circa 150'000 dollari per lo sviluppo di Wikipedia. Wikipedia appartiene alla società Bomis, ma Wales e Sanger hanno già l'idea di mettere in piedi una struttura non-profit per gestire Wikipedia.<ref>MIT Technology Review 2001/09/04 Free the Encyclopedias!</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wales, who is founder and CEO of San Diego-based Web portal Bomis, has spent about $150,000 of his own money developing Wikipedia. Technically, Wikipedia is owned by Bomis, but Wales and Sanger plan to set up a nonprofit to run the Web-based encyclopedia.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
WP vs Britannica
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Wikipedia, which one might consider intellectual anarchy extruded into encyclopedia form with a chat feature thrown in, is stemming a tide against charging for content on the Web. But it will probably never dethrone Britannica, whose 232-year reputation is based upon hiring world-renowned experts and exhaustively reviewing their articles with a staff of more than a hundred editors.
"There are a lot of reference works on the Internet, but we don't concern ourselves about them too much," says Tom Panelas, director of communications at Britannica. "People are coming to realize that while there's a lot of information on the Internet, a lot of it is plain nonsense, and much of it is of questionable provenance. Being Britannica, we've always had a natural constituency of people who know Britannica is a name they can trust for reliable, well-written information." To read Britannica on the Web you must pony up $50 a year, although you can read the first two paragraphs of articles for free. The company won't release subscription figures but claims that more than seven million users search britannica.com each month during the school year. Walter Bender, executive director of MIT's Media Laboratory, believes that what makes Britannica a valuable resource is the scope and depth of its editing, and free Web-based encyclopedias such as Wikipedia will probably never be able to compete with that. "The downside is that [Britannica] cannot practically keep pace with the growth of knowledge and information," says Bender. "For example, Britannica still uses the entry on the city of Boston written almost twenty years ago by Jack Driscoll, former editor of the Boston Globe. The article was written in a timeless prose, but it no longer captures the essence of the city." True, but Wikipedia's entry on Boston reads as follows: "The capital city of Massachusetts, USA. The greater Boston area has many suburbs, including Cambridge, Massachusetts."» |
|
«Wikipedia, che qualcuno potrebbe considerare come l'anarchia intellettuale sviluppata in forma enciclopedica, con l'aggiunta di una chat, cerca di andar contro la tendenza di far pagare per i contenuti in rete. Ma non riuscirà mai a detronizzare la Britannica, che con i suoi 232 anni di reputazione si basa sull'assunzione di esperti riconosciuti a livello mondiale e rivedendo i loro articoli con uno staff di più di cento editori.
"Ci sono un mucchio di lavori con riferimentiXXXXX in internet, ma non ci interessano più di tanto" dice Tom Panelas, direttore delle comunicazioni per la Britannica. "Le persone stanno cominciando a realizzare che mentre c'è molta informazione in internet, molta è assolutamente priva di senso, e molta è di dubbia provenienza. Essendo la Britannica, noi sempre abbiamo una natural constituency of people che sa che la Britannica è un nome di cui fidarsi per informazioni affidabili e ben scritte." Per leggere la Britannica sul web bisogna pagare 50$ all'anno, sebbene sia possibile leggere gratuitamente i primi due paragrafi degli articoli. La società non rilascia le cifre delle sottoscrizioni ma afferma che più di 7 milioni di utenti hanno consultato britannica.com ogni mese durante l'anno scolastico. Walter Bender, direttore esecutivo dei Media Laboratory del MIT, crede che ciò che rende la Britannica una valida risorsa è l'obiettivo e la profondità dei suoi lavori, e le enciclopedie libere come Wikipedia non saranno probabilmente mai in grado di competere con questo. "Il lato negativo è che la Britannica non può praticamente tenere il passo con la crescita della conoscenza e dell'informazione", dice Bender. "Per esempio, la Britannica usa ancora la voce della città di Boston scritta 20 anni prima da Jack Driscoll, l'allora editore del Boston Globe. L'articolo fu scritto in una prosa atemporale, ma non coglie più l'essenza della città". Vero, la voce di Wikipedia su Boston dice: "La capitale del Massachusetts, USA. La grande Boston ha molti quartieri, incluso Cambridge, Massachusetts."<ref>MIT Technology Review 2001/09/04 Free the Encyclopedias!</ref>» | |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wikipedia, which one might consider intellectual anarchy extruded into encyclopedia form with a chat feature thrown in, is stemming a tide against charging for content on the Web. But it will probably never dethrone Britannica, whose 232-year reputation is based upon hiring world-renowned experts and exhaustively reviewing their articles with a staff of more than a hundred editors.
"There are a lot of reference works on the Internet, but we don't concern ourselves about them too much," says Tom Panelas, director of communications at Britannica. "People are coming to realize that while there's a lot of information on the Internet, a lot of it is plain nonsense, and much of it is of questionable provenance. Being Britannica, we've always had a natural constituency of people who know Britannica is a name they can trust for reliable, well-written information." To read Britannica on the Web you must pony up $50 a year, although you can read the first two paragraphs of articles for free. The company won't release subscription figures but claims that more than seven million users search britannica.com each month during the school year. Walter Bender, executive director of MIT's Media Laboratory, believes that what makes Britannica a valuable resource is the scope and depth of its editing, and free Web-based encyclopedias such as Wikipedia will probably never be able to compete with that. "The downside is that [Britannica] cannot practically keep pace with the growth of knowledge and information," says Bender. "For example, Britannica still uses the entry on the city of Boston written almost twenty years ago by Jack Driscoll, former editor of the Boston Globe. The article was written in a timeless prose, but it no longer captures the essence of the city." True, but Wikipedia's entry on Boston reads as follows: "The capital city of Massachusetts, USA. The greater Boston area has many suburbs, including Cambridge, Massachusetts."» | ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- L'articolo del MIT è molto supponente nei confronti di Wikipedia. --Christian (discussione) 03:48, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
New York Times 2001/09/20
{{
#if:Meyers
|{{
#if:
|[[ |Meyers{{
#if: Peter
|, Peter
}}]]
|Meyers{{
#if: Peter
|, Peter
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; et al.
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:September 20, 2001|September 20, 2001| }}
| ({{#if:September 20, 2001|September 20, 2001| }}){{
#if:
| [{{{YearNote}}}]
}}
}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
#if: {{#if:September 20, 2001|September 20, 2001| }}
| ({{#if:September 20, 2001|September 20, 2001| }})
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|{{
#if:Meyers
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{
#if:
|{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|"{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}"
}}]
| {{
#if:
|{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|"{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}"
}}
}} }}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: |
|
|{{
#if: Meyers{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|. written at
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Meyers
|. {{
#if: {{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|in
}}{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|
|. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Meyers
|. }}{{
#if: {{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|"{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
| {{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
| {{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}]
| {{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
}}"}} }}{{
#if:
| (in )
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{
#if: |{{
#if:{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}{{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}|. }}'{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: The New York Times
| (: The New York Times)
| ()
}}
|{{
#if: The New York Times
| (The New York Times)
}}
}}{{
#if:
| '{{
#if:
| ()
}}
|{{
#if:
| ()
}}
}}{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
|: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: {{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|{{
#if: Meyers{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}]
| {{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|. '
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
| ( ed.)
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if: The New York Times
|{{
#if:
|:
|.
}} The New York Times
}}
}}{{
#if: Meyers
|
|{{
#if: {{#if:September 20, 2001|September 20, 2001| }}
|. {{#if:September 20, 2001|September 20, 2001| }}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: | {{#if:September 20, 2001|September 20, 2001| }}
|
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Meyers
|.
| (published )
}}
|{{
#if:
|.
| (published )
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
|. {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
- if:
|. doi:{{#if: | (inactive ) {{#ifeq: | | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y | }}]] }} | }}
}}{{
#if: |.
}}{{
#if: |. ISBN
}}{{
#if: |. ISSN [5]
}}{{
#if: |. OCLC [6]
}}{{
#if: |. PMID
}}{{
#if:
|{{#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software
|. PMC: [7]
}}
}}{{
#if: |. Bibcode: [8]
}}{{
#if:
|. {{{Archive}}}
|{{
#if:{{#if:|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software}}
|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software}}
| [{{#if:|http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software}} the original]
| the original
}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{
#if:
| on
|. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}}
}}
|{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
}}
}}{{
#if: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software |{{ #if: {{#if:|Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}}{{#if:||Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You}} |. {{ #if: | |http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software }} |. {{ #if: | |http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E5D6123BF933A1575AC0A9679C8B63&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fComputer%20Software }} }}{{ #if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} }}
}}{{#if:
|. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{#if:
|. ""
}}{{#if:||.}}
Comunità
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Wikipedians, as they call themselves»
|
|
«Wikipediani, come si chiamano fra loro<ref>New York Times 2001/09/20 Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wikipedians, as they call themselves»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- È questa la prima traccia (pubblica) del termine "Wikipediani"?
- --Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
Britannica
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«In July Encyclopaedia Britannica began charging $5 a month for access.»
|
|
«In Luglio l'Enclopedia Britannica ha iniziato a farsi pagare $5 per l'accesso.<ref>New York Times 2001/09/20 Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«In July Encyclopaedia Britannica began charging $5 a month for access.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Perché partecipare (perché funziona)
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«That is the view of James J. O'Donnell, a professor of classical studies and vice provost for information systems at the University of Pennsylvania who examined the influence of digital media on writing in his book Avatars of the Word (Harvard University Press, 1998), I had a strong sense as I went in that I was in a community of people who were talking to each other, he said of his explorations of Wikipedia.
The thing and the experience may be much more valuable for those who are creating it than it is for somebody who just walks in saying, 'So when is the Second Punic War and which one was that?' Mr. O'Donnell said. A community that finds a way to talk in this way is creating education and online discourse at a higher level.»
|
|
«Questa è l'opinione di James O'Donnel, un professore di studi classici e vice provost all'Università della Pennsylvenia che ha esaminato l'influenza dei media digitali sulla scrittura nel suo libr "Avatars del mondo" (Harvard University Press, 1998), Ho avuto la forte impressione, quando entrai, di trovarmi in una comunità di persone che si parlavano fra loro disse riguardo ad una delle sue esplorazioni in Wikipedia.
La cosa stessa e l'esperienza potrebbero essere molto più preziose per coloro che lo stanno creando piuttoso che per qualcuno da fuori che entra dicendo, 'Allora quando c'è stata la Seconda Guerra punica e che è successo?' ha detto O'Donnell. Una comunità che trova il modo di parlare in questo modo stra creando educazione e una conversazione online ad un più altro livello.<ref>New York Times 2001/09/20 Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You</ref> »
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«That is the view of James J. O'Donnell, a professor of classical studies and vice provost for information systems at the University of Pennsylvania who examined the influence of digital media on writing in his book Avatars of the Word (Harvard University Press, 1998), I had a strong sense as I went in that I was in a community of people who were talking to each other, he said of his explorations of Wikipedia.
The thing and the experience may be much more valuable for those who are creating it than it is for somebody who just walks in saying, 'So when is the Second Punic War and which one was that?' Mr. O'Donnell said. A community that finds a way to talk in this way is creating education and online discourse at a higher level.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:59, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
reveries.com (NYT story summarized)--Christian (discussione) 18:10, 16 feb 2009 (CET)International Herald Tribune (reprint of NYT story) 2001/09/24
Kuro5hin 2001/9/24
Kuro5hin Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn't it full of nonsense? (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)
Richard Stallman e licenza
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«The most recent development is that free software guru Richard Stallman has endorsed the Wikipedia project alongside his endorsement of Nupedia. Stallman described Wikipedia's successes to me as "really exciting news." »
|
|
«La più recente novità è che Richard Stallman, il guru del software libero appoggia il progetto<ref>Kuro5hin Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn't it full of nonsense? (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«The most recent development is that free software guru Richard Stallman has endorsed the Wikipedia project alongside his endorsement of Nupedia. Stallman described Wikipedia's successes to me as "really exciting news." »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Sanger: suo ruolo e collaboratori
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«(Full disclosure: I am, with Jimmy Wales, the co-founder of Wikipedia and its only full-time paid participant. I feel very uncomfortable calling myself its "editor-in-chief." The participants would rebel at that title, and it would be "anti-wiki"--"anti-wiki" is bad, in case you didn't know.)
Among Wikipedia's active contributors are Axel Boldt, mathematics professor at Metropolitan State University in Saint Paul, Minnesota; Michael Tinkler, a professor of art history; a female professor in both ESL and mathematics at Columbia U. and CUNY; and well over a dozen other Ph.D.'s, M.D.'s, and highly-educated people from around the world. In addition, there are many extremely bright, articulate graduate students and undergraduates involved. There are also dozens of computer programmers who are constantly displaying their knowledge both within and outside the bounds of computer science. Everyone is welcome and their work is judged on its own merits. »
|
|
«Sono, insieme a Jimmy Wales, co-fondatore di Wikipedia e l'unico partecipante pagato a tempo pieno. Non mi sento a mio agio definendomi "capo editore". I partecipanti si ribellerebbero a questo titolo, e sarebbe "anti-wiki" - "anti-wiki" è male, nel caso non lo sapeste.
Fra gli utenti attivi c'è Axel Boldt, professore di matematica alla Metropolitan State University di Saint Paul, Minnesota; Michael Tinkler, un professore di storia dell'arte; una professoressa "in both ESL" e matematica alla Columbia U. e CUNY; e più di una dozzina di dottori, laureati e persone con una educazione avanzata da tutto il mondo. In più ci sono molti studenti svegli e versatili, universitari e di college. Dozzine di programmatori che costantemente mostrano le loro conoscenze non solo nell'informatica. Chiunque è benvenuto e il loro lavoro è giudicato per il proprio merito<ref>Kuro5hin Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn't it full of nonsense? (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«(Full disclosure: I am, with Jimmy Wales, the co-founder of Wikipedia and its only full-time paid participant. I feel very uncomfortable calling myself its "editor-in-chief." The participants would rebel at that title, and it would be "anti-wiki"--"anti-wiki" is bad, in case you didn't know.)
Among Wikipedia's active contributors are Axel Boldt, mathematics professor at Metropolitan State University in Saint Paul, Minnesota; Michael Tinkler, a professor of art history; a female professor in both ESL and mathematics at Columbia U. and CUNY; and well over a dozen other Ph.D.'s, M.D.'s, and highly-educated people from around the world. In addition, there are many extremely bright, articulate graduate students and undergraduates involved. There are also dozens of computer programmers who are constantly displaying their knowledge both within and outside the bounds of computer science. Everyone is welcome and their work is judged on its own merits. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
perche partecipare?
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«So how is it possible that so many otherwise upstanding intellectuals love Wikipedia (some, secretly) and spend so much time on it? Why aren't we writing for academic journals, or something?
It's fun, first of all. But it can be fun for intellectually serious people only if we know that we're creating something of quality. And how do we know that? The basic outlines of the answer ought to be fairly obvious to anyone who has read Eric S. Raymond's famous essay on the open source movement, "The Cathedral and the Bazaar." Remember, if we can edit any page, then we can edit each other's work. Given enough eyeballs, all errors are shallow. We catch each other's mistakes and enjoy correcting them. So, we're are constantly monitoring Wikipedia's Recent Changes page. When--as happens rarely--some eedjit shows up and vandalizes a page, it's fixed nearly instantly. (We save back copies of all pages, and these are very easily accessible.) We (that is, we participants) work on a lot of different pages, and I think most of us feel some collective responsibility for how the whole thing looks. We're constantly cleaning up after each other and new people. In the process, a camaraderie--a politeness and congeniality not found on many online discussion forums--has developed. We've got to respect each other, because we are each other's editors, and we all have more or less the same goal: to create a huge, high-quality free encyclopedia. The way I see it, we're having fun creating a thing of beauty. » |
|
«Ma come è possibile che così tanti otherwise upstanding intellectuals amano Wikipedia (alcuni segretamente) e spendono così tanto tempo su di essa? Perché non scriviamo per giornali scientifici o altro?
Innanzitutto è divertente. Ma può essere divertente per le persone intellettualmente serie solo se crediamo che stiamo creando qualcosa di qualità. E come lo sappiamo? La risposta è abbastanza ovvia per chiunque abbia letto il test di Eric S. Raymond sul movimento open source: "LA cattedrale e il bazaar". Se si può modificare qualsiasi pagina, significa che si può modificare il lavoro di altri. Dati abbastanza occhi, tutti gli errori sono scoperti. Ci troviamo l'un l'altro gli errori e li correggiamo. Monitoriamo costantemente la pagina deglle ultime modifiche. Quando, rare volte una pagina è stata vandalizzata, viene ripristinata immediatamente. Salviamo le copie precedenti di tutte le pagine e queste sono facilmente recuperabili. Noi partecipanti lavoriamo molto su diverse pagine, e credo che molti di noi sentono una specie di responsabilità collettiva per come appare tutta la cosa. Facciamo le pulizie dopo ogni intervento. Nel processo si è sviluppato un cameratismo, un'educazione e una congenialità che non si trova in molti forum di discussione online. Dobbiamo rispettarci l'un l'altro, perché siamo ognuno editori dell'altro e abbiamo tutti più o meno lo stesso obiettivo: creare un'enorme, enciclopedia libera e di qualità<ref>Kuro5hin Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn't it full of nonsense? (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>» | |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«So how is it possible that so many otherwise upstanding intellectuals love Wikipedia (some, secretly) and spend so much time on it? Why aren't we writing for academic journals, or something?
It's fun, first of all. But it can be fun for intellectually serious people only if we know that we're creating something of quality. And how do we know that? The basic outlines of the answer ought to be fairly obvious to anyone who has read Eric S. Raymond's famous essay on the open source movement, "The Cathedral and the Bazaar." Remember, if we can edit any page, then we can edit each other's work. Given enough eyeballs, all errors are shallow. We catch each other's mistakes and enjoy correcting them. So, we're are constantly monitoring Wikipedia's Recent Changes page. When--as happens rarely--some eedjit shows up and vandalizes a page, it's fixed nearly instantly. (We save back copies of all pages, and these are very easily accessible.) We (that is, we participants) work on a lot of different pages, and I think most of us feel some collective responsibility for how the whole thing looks. We're constantly cleaning up after each other and new people. In the process, a camaraderie--a politeness and congeniality not found on many online discussion forums--has developed. We've got to respect each other, because we are each other's editors, and we all have more or less the same goal: to create a huge, high-quality free encyclopedia. The way I see it, we're having fun creating a thing of beauty. » | ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:23, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Britannica 1
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«The implication is that Wikipedia has a nice community, but it doesn't have much breadth, depth, or reliability; so if you want serious information, go to Britannica.
If Wikipedians believed that, we'd bag the whole thing. We think we are--gradually, and sometimes from very rough first drafts--developing a reliable resource. So what answer can I offer to the above concerns? Part of the answer is already given above: Wikipedia's self-correction process (Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales calls it "self-healing") is very robust. » |
|
«La conseguenza è che Wikipedia ha una bella community, ma non ha ampiezza, spessore, affidabilità; se vuoi infomazioni serie, vai sulla Britannica.
Se i Wikipediani credessero a ciò, lascerebbero perdere. Crediamo che stiamo sviluppando una risorsa affidabile. Che cosa posso rispondere al dubbio sollevato sopra? Parte della risposta è già stata data: Il processo di autocorrezione di Wikipedia (che Jimmy Wales definisce "auto-curante") è molto solido.<ref>Kuro5hin Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn't it full of nonsense? (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«The implication is that Wikipedia has a nice community, but it doesn't have much breadth, depth, or reliability; so if you want serious information, go to Britannica.
If Wikipedians believed that, we'd bag the whole thing. We think we are--gradually, and sometimes from very rough first drafts--developing a reliable resource. So what answer can I offer to the above concerns? Part of the answer is already given above: Wikipedia's self-correction process (Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales calls it "self-healing") is very robust. » | ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Britannica 2
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«So it seems very reasonable to think that within a few years the project will surpass Britannica in both breadth and depth. At our current rate of growth, we will have over 100,000 articles by 2005; »
|
|
«È piuttosto ragionevole pensare che entro pochi anni il progetto sorpasserà la Britannica sia in estensione che in precisione. All'attuale tasso di crescita, avremo più di 100'000 articoli entro il 2005<ref>Kuro5hin Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn't it full of nonsense? (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:39, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:39, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«So it seems very reasonable to think that within a few years the project will surpass Britannica in both breadth and depth. At our current rate of growth, we will have over 100,000 articles by 2005; »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:39, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:39, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Un'altra buona dose di "numeri" di Wikipedia per confronto ;-) --Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
Sanger / processo di approvazione / esperti
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«But what about reliability? That's a third part of the answer. It seems very likely that, in coming months, Wikipedia will set up some sort of approval process, whereby certain versions of articles receive the stamp of approval of some body of Wikipedia reviewers. There have been two main proposals about how to set up a review process. Whatever the shape of the process, it would act entirely independently of article generation. (We certainly do not want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.) But after it's in place, we will be able to present a set of genuine expert-approved articles that can favorably compare with articles from any general encyclopedia--Britannica included. »
|
|
«Che tipo di affidabilità? C'è una terza parte della risposta. È abbastanza probabile che, nei prossimi mesi, Wikipedia metterà in piedi una sorta di processo di approvazione, in cui certe versioni dell'articolo ricevono un marchio di approvazione da una parte dei revisori di Wikipedia. Ci sono stati due proposte principali su come mettere in piedi questo sistema di revisione. Qualunque forma avrà il processo, agirà in modo completamente indipendente dalla sviluppo dell'articolo (Certamente non vogliamo uccidere la gallina dalle uova d'oro). Ma dopo che sarà in funzione, saremo capaci di presentare una serie di articoli originali approvati da esperti che potranno confrontarsi con qualsiasi enciclopedia generale, anche la Britannica.<ref>Kuro5hin Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn't it full of nonsense? (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«But what about reliability? That's a third part of the answer. It seems very likely that, in coming months, Wikipedia will set up some sort of approval process, whereby certain versions of articles receive the stamp of approval of some body of Wikipedia reviewers. There have been two main proposals about how to set up a review process. Whatever the shape of the process, it would act entirely independently of article generation. (We certainly do not want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.) But after it's in place, we will be able to present a set of genuine expert-approved articles that can favorably compare with articles from any general encyclopedia--Britannica included. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:16, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
MSNBC (reprint of Tech Review story)--Christian (discussione) 18:10, 16 feb 2009 (CET)Graham Lawton, "The Great Giveway," NewScientist (British science magazine) (see also the associated forum and note that this article is copylefted!)--Christian (discussione) 18:10, 16 feb 2009 (CET)Open Source Schools, reprinted on iteachnet.org (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)
- Accesso negato
Free Online Scholarship Newsletter 10/26/01
Free Online Scholarship Newsletter, 10/26/01 (Larry Sanger)
Contrastare i vandalismi
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«So why should you trust unsigned articles that might have been written by idiots and revised by morons? The creators have introduced many features whose tendency is to insure that ignorant, incorrect, illiterate, and mischievous contributions --and deletions-- are caught early and either corrected or undone. For example, only Wikipedia administrators can totally or permanently delete pages. Other deletions are kept for two weeks in a "kept pages" archive where any other user can find and restore them. After mischievous contributors are identified they can be blocked by administrators. Recent changes are collected on a special page for special scrutiny. Soon administrators will have the power to undo all changes from a particular user or particular IP address. The entire Wikipedia is frequently backed up, allowing administrators to restore any entry mangled by users. Administrators are considering several proposals for retroactive peer review.»
|
|
«{{{3}}}»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«So why should you trust unsigned articles that might have been written by idiots and revised by morons? The creators have introduced many features whose tendency is to insure that ignorant, incorrect, illiterate, and mischievous contributions --and deletions-- are caught early and either corrected or undone. For example, only Wikipedia administrators can totally or permanently delete pages. Other deletions are kept for two weeks in a "kept pages" archive where any other user can find and restore them. After mischievous contributors are identified they can be blocked by administrators. Recent changes are collected on a special page for special scrutiny. Soon administrators will have the power to undo all changes from a particular user or particular IP address. The entire Wikipedia is frequently backed up, allowing administrators to restore any entry mangled by users. Administrators are considering several proposals for retroactive peer review.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Si parla di amministratori, una pagina limbo (sparita con il cambio di software?!), la possibilità di bloccare degli utenti, la pagina delle "Ultime modifiche", backup. Su quest'ultimo punto si potrebbe sviluppare il discorso che la licenza permette di scaricare tutte le pagine e ripartire con il progetto in un altro posto. In teoria ci sono altri backup in giro per il mondo. Wikipedia va oltre Wikipedia. Ma nello stesso tempo Wikipedia è insostituibile in quanto raccoglie una comunità e un savoir-faire articolatissimo.
- Sanger insiste ancora, anche qui sul peer review: forse lui stesso si immagina ancora un'enciclopedia "controllata". Interessante che siano anche i giorni dello scontro con "The Cunctator", no?
- --Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
Pubblicità? Spanish Fork
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«After it gets off the ground, it may generate revenue through ads and pay its administrators from the revenue.»
|
|
«{{{3}}}»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«After it gets off the ground, it may generate revenue through ads and pay its administrators from the revenue.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- A questo punto i timori degli spagnoli sono legittimi...
- --Christian (discussione) 02:57, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
Open Source Schools (another column) (by Wikipedia's Larry Sanger)
- Accesso negato
Shift Magazine (mentioned in The Shiftlist, a regular link collection)
- Non più disponibile
- Niente di particolare, se non che è stato scritto da un hawaiano!
The New York Times Magazine 2001/12/09
The New York Times Magazine 2001/12/09 Populist editing
Approfondimenti iniqui
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«With a total of 16,000 articles in the database, the Wikipedia is already large enough to be a source of generally reliable information, though stronger in some areas (Star Trek spinoffs) than others (the novels of Charles Dickens).»
|
|
«Con in tutto 16.000 articoli nel database, Wikipedia è già larga abbastanza per essere la fonte di informazione generalmente affidabile, anche se più forte in alcuni campi (come Star Trek) che altri (i romanzi di Charles Dickens)<ref>The New York Times Magazine 2001/12/09 Populist editing</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:08, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:08, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«With a total of 16,000 articles in the database, the Wikipedia is already large enough to be a source of generally reliable information, though stronger in some areas (Star Trek spinoffs) than others (the novels of Charles Dickens).»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:08, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:08, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
An interview about the wiki concept with Ward Cunningham by National Public Radio in the U.S. mentioned Wikipedia. The interview can be listened to (as of this writing) here. 2001/12/20 future tense
- Interessante la metafora del wiki come una storia che migliora ogni volta che viene raccontata. Ma niente di particolare.
-
What Are the Busiest Web Sites? ThirdAge , December 25, 2001, AP
- Non più disponibile
Yahoo! Internet Life: "Brain Waves: Works in Progress," apparently (has anyone seen it yet?) is in Volume 8, Number 2.
- Non più disponibile
2002
siliconvalley.internet.com, January 16, 2002
{{
#if:Singer
|{{
#if:
|[[ |Singer{{
#if: Michael
|, Michael
}}]]
|Singer{{
#if: Michael
|, Michael
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; et al.
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 16, 2002|January 16, 2002| }}
| ({{#if:January 16, 2002|January 16, 2002| }}){{
#if:
| [{{{YearNote}}}]
}}
}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 16, 2002|January 16, 2002| }}
| ({{#if:January 16, 2002|January 16, 2002| }})
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|{{
#if:Singer
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{
#if: Jupitermedia
|{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|"{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}"
}}]
| {{
#if: Jupitermedia
|{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|"{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}"
}}
}} }}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: |
|
|{{
#if: Singer{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}Jupitermedia
|. written at
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Singer
|. {{
#if: {{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|in
}}{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|
|. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: Jupitermedia |{{ #if: Singer |. }}{{ #if: {{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}} |"{{#if: {{ #if: {{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}} |{{ #if: |{{ #if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 |http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 |{{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} |{{ #if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 |http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 | {{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} | [{{ #if: {{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}} |{{ #if: |{{ #if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 |http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 |{{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} |{{ #if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 |http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 | {{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} {{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}] | {{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
}}"}} }}{{
#if:
| (in )
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{
#if: Jupitermedia|{{
#if:{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}{{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}|. }}Jupitermedia{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Internet Archive
| (: Internet Archive)
| ()
}}
|{{
#if: Internet Archive
| (Internet Archive)
}}
}}{{
#if:
| '{{
#if:
| ()
}}
|{{
#if:
| ()
}}
}}{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
|: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: {{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|{{
#if: Singer{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}Jupitermedia
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}]
| {{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|. '
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
| ( ed.)
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if: Internet Archive
|{{
#if:
|:
|.
}} Internet Archive
}}
}}{{
#if: Singer
|
|{{
#if: {{#if:January 16, 2002|January 16, 2002| }}
|. {{#if:January 16, 2002|January 16, 2002| }}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: | {{#if:January 16, 2002|January 16, 2002| }}
|
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Singer
|.
| (published )
}}
|{{
#if: Jupitermedia
|.
| (published )
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: Jupitermedia | |{{ #if: {{ #if: |p. {{{page}}} |{{ #if: |pp. {{{pages}}} | }} }} |. {{ #if: |p. {{{page}}} |{{ #if: |pp. {{{pages}}} | }} }} }}
}}{{
- if:
|. doi:{{#if: | (inactive ) {{#ifeq: | | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y | }}]] }} | }}
}}{{
#if: |.
}}{{
#if: |. ISBN
}}{{
#if: |. ISSN [9]
}}{{
#if: |. OCLC [10]
}}{{
#if: |. PMID
}}{{
#if:
|{{#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641
|. PMC: [11]
}}
}}{{
#if: |. Bibcode: [12]
}}{{
#if:
|. {{{Archive}}}
|{{
#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641}}
|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641}}
| [{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641}} the original]
| the original
}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{
#if:
| on
|. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}}
}}
|{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
}}
}}{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 |{{ #if: {{#if:Jupitermedia|Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}}{{#if:Jupitermedia||Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One}} |. {{ #if: | |http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 }} |. {{ #if: | |http://web.archive.org/web/20030316082912/siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/3531_956641 }} }}{{ #if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} }}
}}{{#if:
|. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{#if:
|. ""
}}{{#if:||.}}
perché funziona?
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«The two attribute Wikipedia's success so far to the presence of a strong core group of contributors who together maintain community standards of quality and neutrality.
At present, nearly 200 people are working on the project daily, from all around the world; organizers estimate that the project has had well over a thousand contributors. The success of such an open project, staffed by such a large and diverse body of writers, is a puzzle: how can so many people with so many different backgrounds collaborate with such little oversight? Project organizers say that it is partly because the participants can edit each others' contributions easily, and partly because the project has a strong "nonbias" policy; this keeps interaction relatively polite and productive. "If contributors took controversial stands, it would be virtually impossible for people of many different viewpoints to collaborate," says Sanger. "Because of the neutrality policy, we have partisans working together on the same articles. It's quite remarkable."» |
|
«Il secondo attributo per il successo di Wikipedia finora è la presenza di un forte gruppo centrale di utenti che insieme mantiene gli standard comunitari di qualità e neutralità. [...] Al momento quasi 200 persone stanno lavorando al progetto giornalmente, da tutto il mondo; gli organizzatori stimano che il progetto abbia avuto molto più di mille utenti. Il successo di un simile progetto aperto, realizzato da un così grande numero di scrittori anche molto diversi fra loro, è un mistero: com'è possibile che collaborino persone con background così diversi fra di loro con così poca sorveglianza? Gli organizzatori del progetto sostengono che in parte è dovuto al fatto che i partecipanti possono editarsi facilmente i contributi l'un l'altro e in parte perché il progetto ha una forte politica "nonbias"; questo mantiene le interazioni relativamente gentili e produttive.
"Se i partecipanti prendessero posizioni controverse, sarebbe virtualmente impossibile collaborare per persone con così tanti e differenti punti di vista." dice Sanger. "Grazie alla politica della 'neutralità', abbiamo delle persone attive che lavorano insieme sullo stesso articolo. È abbastanza rilevante"<ref>Michael Singer, "Free Encyclopedia Project Celebrates Year One," siliconvalley.internet.com, January 16, 2002</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Andrea (discussione) 16:20, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Andrea (discussione) 16:20, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«The two attribute Wikipedia's success so far to the presence of a strong core group of contributors who together maintain community standards of quality and neutrality.
At present, nearly 200 people are working on the project daily, from all around the world; organizers estimate that the project has had well over a thousand contributors. The success of such an open project, staffed by such a large and diverse body of writers, is a puzzle: how can so many people with so many different backgrounds collaborate with such little oversight? Project organizers say that it is partly because the participants can edit each others' contributions easily, and partly because the project has a strong "nonbias" policy; this keeps interaction relatively polite and productive. "If contributors took controversial stands, it would be virtually impossible for people of many different viewpoints to collaborate," says Sanger. "Because of the neutrality policy, we have partisans working together on the same articles. It's quite remarkable."» | ||
| {{#if:--Andrea (discussione) 16:20, 18 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Andrea (discussione) 16:20, 18 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Non so se l'avevano già detto prima da qualche parte, ma credo qui inizi l'idea del ristretto numero di utenti che controlla e rende il progetto stabile (la questione se inseriscono nuovo materiale non è qui citata). Iniziano anche le riflessioni sull' effetto del NPOV--Andrea (discussione) 16:20, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
- Potrebbe essere un buon punto per inserire il NPOV. Interessante anche i numeri che dà. E poi c'è il wiki magic, no? Bravo Andre', siamo sulla stessa linea d'onda! --Christian (discussione) 03:46, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
"Open Source SEM-Cyclopedia Project Launched," Software Dioxide, January 17, 2002
- Pagina non trovata. --Andrea (discussione) 16:27, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
-
"Free Encyclopedia Project," PNN online: the nonprofit news and information resource, January 28, 2002 (light editing of press release)
- Pagina non travata. --Andrea (discussione) 16:27, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002
"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.
Dimissioni di Sanger
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger has announced his resignation. [...] Sanger writes that he was offered to edit Wikipedia as a full time job, but that funding for such full time participation was no longer available:
As a job, this has been the best I've ever had. But this project is not something I would have chosen as a hobby, frankly;»
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger has announced his resignation. [...] Sanger writes that he was offered to edit Wikipedia as a full time job, but that funding for such full time participation was no longer available:
As a job, this has been the best I've ever had. But this project is not something I would have chosen as a hobby, frankly;»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
pubblicità?
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Wikipedia is a commercial project for which several funding models have been discussed. The site's creators seem to favor a model where a designated "fixed" section of Wikipedia articles is used for advertisements -- the FDL allows such document sections. However, none of these plans have come to fruition yet, and donations are not currently visibly requested. Wikipedia has recently reached a milestone of 25,000 articles (this number does not include article "stubs" or meta content). The transition to a new PHP-based Wiki engine has put the project temporarily in peril, with massive slowdowns for common operations. »
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wikipedia is a commercial project for which several funding models have been discussed. The site's creators seem to favor a model where a designated "fixed" section of Wikipedia articles is used for advertisements -- the FDL allows such document sections. However, none of these plans have come to fruition yet, and donations are not currently visibly requested. Wikipedia has recently reached a milestone of 25,000 articles (this number does not include article "stubs" or meta content). The transition to a new PHP-based Wiki engine has put the project temporarily in peril, with massive slowdowns for common operations. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
importanza di Larry Sanger
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Larry Sanger played a crucial role in the first year of Wikipedia and has helped establish a shared philosophy for its users. At the same time, many felt that his authoritative tone was unnecessary and in contradiction to Wikipedia's goals. This may well be the right time to abandon the concept of "editorship" altogether and let the project grow into a "meritocracy", a site dominated by those who have contributed the most and only controlled in a technical sense.»
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Larry Sanger played a crucial role in the first year of Wikipedia and has helped establish a shared philosophy for its users. At the same time, many felt that his authoritative tone was unnecessary and in contradiction to Wikipedia's goals. This may well be the right time to abandon the concept of "editorship" altogether and let the project grow into a "meritocracy", a site dominated by those who have contributed the most and only controlled in a technical sense.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
modello di business
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«It is also high time for Wikipedia to explore actual business models, or other people will simply download the Wikipedia tarballs and fork a new project. Given the fact that Wikipedia is actually read by many different people (it is well-indexed by most search engines), it seems like a donation link (and statistics) on every page would be a good start. Naysayers should look at projects like DynDNS, which has received substantial donations from nearly 10,000 of its users, which amounts to roughly 5% of its user base. »
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«It is also high time for Wikipedia to explore actual business models, or other people will simply download the Wikipedia tarballs and fork a new project. Given the fact that Wikipedia is actually read by many different people (it is well-indexed by most search engines), it seems like a donation link (and statistics) on every page would be a good start. Naysayers should look at projects like DynDNS, which has received substantial donations from nearly 10,000 of its users, which amounts to roughly 5% of its user base. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Affidabilità
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Disagreements often center on what is or is not "mainstream" opinion and what is or isn't a fact that does not need further explanation.
A real problem is that there is absolutely no guarantee that an article you view at any given time is not totally biased or screwed up, because it may well have been edited by someone just a minute ago. But usually, such edits are quickly fixed. More rigid security models may help the project, but this is commonly seen as a bad thing by wiki advocates. »
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Disagreements often center on what is or is not "mainstream" opinion and what is or isn't a fact that does not need further explanation.
A real problem is that there is absolutely no guarantee that an article you view at any given time is not totally biased or screwed up, because it may well have been edited by someone just a minute ago. But usually, such edits are quickly fixed. More rigid security models may help the project, but this is commonly seen as a bad thing by wiki advocates. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Portabilità del progetto
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Overall, the future of Wikipedia still looks promising -- even if its content is eventually hosted by someone else, or on a peer-to-peer network. »
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Overall, the future of Wikipedia still looks promising -- even if its content is eventually hosted by someone else, or on a peer-to-peer network. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Niente di particolare. --Andrea (discussione) 16:04, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
- Beh, qualcosa sì: le dimissioni di Sanger! --Christian (discussione) 04:11, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
- Oddio,che stupido.. è vero ;-) Andrea (discussione) 11:53, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
-
Something Wiki this way comes: Wikis as Web-based collaboration tools, Australasian Business Intelligence , March, 2002
- Non sembra rilevante, ma non si può leggere tutto perché a pagamento. --Christian (discussione) 16:36, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Computer User, May 2, 2002
Sara Aase, "The do-it-yourself encyclopedia: Wikipedia's storehouse of knowledge is a group effort," Computer User, May 2, 2002.
Massima
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«The more I looked at this site, the more I realized that it also embodies the exasperating and exhilarating nature of the World Wide Web--that information is free and ultimately uncontrollable.»
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«The more I looked at this site, the more I realized that it also embodies the exasperating and exhilarating nature of the World Wide Web--that information is free and ultimately uncontrollable.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Regole di base
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«There are naming conventions to respect, so that people can find and add to your entry. There are also language rules to learn. For example, to create a link, you place double brackets around a word, like this. Contributors must also make sure that they only submit information to which they either hold the copyright or took from the public domain. Because Wikipedia operates under the same open-source agreement as Linux, contributors agree that anything they submit is distributed freely and can be augmented.»
|
|
«<ref>"Wikipedia Editor Larry Sanger Resigns," Kuro5hin.org, March 1, 2002.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«There are naming conventions to respect, so that people can find and add to your entry. There are also language rules to learn. For example, to create a link, you place double brackets around a word, like this. Contributors must also make sure that they only submit information to which they either hold the copyright or took from the public domain. Because Wikipedia operates under the same open-source agreement as Linux, contributors agree that anything they submit is distributed freely and can be augmented.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 04:22, 19 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Mary Ellen Quinn, Wikipedia, Booklist Magazine, a publication of the American Library Association, September 15, 2002
- Sono riuscito a trovarlo in un database (ho accesso ad un sacco di roba ora ;-)) e lo riporto tutto. Interessante perchè simpatico, e credo il primo "articolo" scritto da e per il mondo bibliotecario. --Andrea (discussione) 20:32, 18 feb 2009 (CET)
- Davvero complimenti! Ottimo lavoro. Stavo pensando che, visto che si tratta di un documento vero e proprio, forse andava messo in una pagina sua e linkato. Qui poi possiamo riprendere solo le citazioni più rilevanti (che comunque penso siano diverse) --Christian (discussione) 04:34, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
- Fatto quanto detto. --Christian (discussione) 16:00, 22 apr 2009 (CEST)
- Articolo interessante, ma non ho trovato spunti particolari. --Christian (discussione) 16:25, 24 apr 2009 (CEST)
- Fatto quanto detto. --Christian (discussione) 16:00, 22 apr 2009 (CEST)
-
John Jerney, "The Wikipedia: The encyclopedia for the rest of us" for the Daily Yomiuri Online (Yomiuri Shimbun), 2002/10/22 (no longer available online).
- Non più disponibile --Christian (discussione) 04:37, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
Daily Telegraph online article, 17 August 2002
Daily Telegraph online article "Japan and South Korea fall out over 'sea with no name'" (17 August) links to Sea of Japan
- Il Daily Telegraph online linka a Wikipedia! --Christian (discussione) 04:47, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
- Daily Telegraph online article "Mahathir's drive against militants wins over West" (1 November) links to Demographics of Malaysia.
- [13] Daily Telegraph online article "New clue to riddle of hanged banker" (15 Oct) links to Roberto Calvi
- Daily Telegraph online article "Tebbit will stay, says Tory leader" (12 Oct) links to Norman Tebbit
-
Searcher, novembre 2002
Just Can't Hardly Give It Away: Generosity Versus Copyright by Carol Ebbinghouse, Library Director, Western State University College of Law, Vol. 10 No. 10 — Nov/Dec 2002, Searcher,
- Articolo carino, ma tocca solo di striscio Wikipedia. --Christian (discussione) 04:52, 19 feb 2009 (CET)
- Ci ripenso. Forse l'articolo può aiutare ad allargare il discorso al di là di WP. --Christian (discussione) 22:49, 21 feb 2009 (CET)
2003
-
Bruce Perens, 17 gennaio 2003
In an interview on NPR's "Talk of the Nation - Science Friday", Bruce Perens made a special point of referencing Wikipedia as an example of an OpenSource project. January 17, 2003.
- Niente di particolare, se non che Bruce Perens accenna a Wikipedia come un esperimento interessante sull'onda dell'open source. --Christian (discussione) 00:39, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Wired, 28 gennaio 2003
{{
#if:Mayfield
|{{
#if:
|[[ |Mayfield{{
#if: Kendra
|, Kendra
}}]]
|Mayfield{{
#if: Kendra
|, Kendra
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; et al.
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 28, 2003|January 28, 2003| }}
| ({{#if:January 28, 2003|January 28, 2003| }}){{
#if:
| [{{{YearNote}}}]
}}
}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 28, 2003|January 28, 2003| }}
| ({{#if:January 28, 2003|January 28, 2003| }})
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|{{
#if:Mayfield
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{
#if: Wired
|{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|"{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}"
}}]
| {{
#if: Wired
|{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|"{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}"
}}
}} }}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: |
|
|{{
#if: Mayfield{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}Wired
|. written at
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Mayfield
|. {{
#if: {{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|in
}}{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|
|. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: Wired |{{ #if: Mayfield |. }}{{ #if: {{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}} |"{{#if: {{ #if: {{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}} |{{ #if: |{{ #if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 |http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 |{{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} |{{ #if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 |http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 | {{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} | [{{ #if: {{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}} |{{ #if: |{{ #if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 |http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 |{{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} |{{ #if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 |http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 | {{ #if: | http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid= }} }} }} {{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}] | {{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
}}"}} }}{{
#if:
| (in )
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{
#if: Wired|{{
#if:{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}{{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}|. }}Wired{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Wired News
| (: Wired News)
| ()
}}
|{{
#if: Wired News
| (Wired News)
}}
}}{{
#if:
| '{{
#if:
| ()
}}
|{{
#if:
| ()
}}
}}{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
|: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: {{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|{{
#if: Mayfield{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}Wired
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}]
| {{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|. '
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
| ( ed.)
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if: Wired News
|{{
#if:
|:
|.
}} Wired News
}}
}}{{
#if: Mayfield
|
|{{
#if: {{#if:January 28, 2003|January 28, 2003| }}
|. {{#if:January 28, 2003|January 28, 2003| }}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: | {{#if:January 28, 2003|January 28, 2003| }}
|
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Mayfield
|.
| (published )
}}
|{{
#if: Wired
|.
| (published )
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: Wired | |{{ #if: {{ #if: |p. {{{page}}} |{{ #if: |pp. {{{pages}}} | }} }} |. {{ #if: |p. {{{page}}} |{{ #if: |pp. {{{pages}}} | }} }} }}
}}{{
- if:
|. doi:{{#if: | (inactive ) {{#ifeq: | | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y | }}]] }} | }}
}}{{
#if: |.
}}{{
#if: |. ISBN
}}{{
#if: |. ISSN [14]
}}{{
#if: |. OCLC [15]
}}{{
#if: |. PMID
}}{{
#if:
|{{#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364
|. PMC: [16]
}}
}}{{
#if: |. Bibcode: [17]
}}{{
#if:
|. {{{Archive}}}
|{{
#if:{{#if:|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364}}
|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364}}
| [{{#if:|http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364}} the original]
| the original
}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{
#if:
| on
|. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}}
}}
|{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
}}
}}{{
#if: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 |{{ #if: {{#if:Wired|Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}}{{#if:Wired||Not Your Father's Encyclopedia}} |. {{ #if: | |http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 }} |. {{ #if: | |http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2003/01/57364 }} }}{{ #if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} }}
}}{{#if:
|. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{#if:
|. ""
}}{{#if:||.}}
- Niente di particolarmente rilevante, se non che di Wikipedia ne parla Wired. --Christian (discussione) 00:39, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
-
The Guardian, 30 gennaio 2003
{{
#if:Hammersley
|{{
#if:
|[[ |Hammersley{{
#if: Ben
|, Ben
}}]]
|Hammersley{{
#if: Ben
|, Ben
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|;
|{{#if:| & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|[[ |{{
#if:
|,
}}]]
|{{
#if:
|,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; et al.
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
| ({{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}){{
#if:
| [{{{YearNote}}}]
}}
}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
| ({{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }})
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|{{
#if:Hammersley
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
|http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{
#if:
|{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|"{{#if:||Common knowledge}}"
}}]
| {{
#if:
|{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|"{{#if:||Common knowledge}}"
}}
}} }}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: |
|
|{{
#if: Hammersley{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|. written at
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Hammersley
|. {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|in
}}{{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|; {{
#if:
|[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]]
|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if:
|, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
| et al.
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
|. ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Hammersley
|. }}{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
|"{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
| {{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
| {{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Common knowledge}}]
| {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
}}"}} }}{{
#if:
| (in )
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{
#if: |{{
#if:{{#if:||Common knowledge}}{{#if:|Common knowledge}}|. }}'{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#if: The Guardian
| (: The Guardian)
| ()
}}
|{{
#if: The Guardian
| (The Guardian)
}}
}}{{
#if:
| '{{
#if:
| ()
}}
|{{
#if:
| ()
}}
}}{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
|: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
|{{
#if: Hammersley{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|.
}}{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
| [{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|{{
#if:
| http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Common knowledge}}]
| {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
|. '
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if:
| ( ed.)
}}{{
#if:
|.
}}{{
#if: The Guardian
|{{
#if:
|:
|.
}} The Guardian
}}
}}{{
#if: Hammersley
|
|{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|. {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|{{
#ifeq: | {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
|{{
#if:
|{{
#if: Hammersley
|.
| (published )
}}
|{{
#if:
|.
| (published )
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
|{{
#if: {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
|. {{
#if:
|p. {{{page}}}
|{{
#if:
|pp. {{{pages}}}
|
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
- if:
|. doi:{{#if: | (inactive ) {{#ifeq: | | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y | }}]] }} | }}
}}{{
#if: |.
}}{{
#if: |. ISBN
}}{{
#if: |. ISSN [18]
}}{{
#if: |. OCLC [19]
}}{{
#if: |. PMID
}}{{
#if:
|{{#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
|. PMC: [20]
}}
}}{{
#if: |. Bibcode: [21]
}}{{
#if:
|. {{{Archive}}}
|{{
#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}}
|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}}
| [{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}} the original]
| the original
}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{
#if:
| on
|. You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: ||}}
}}
|{{#if:|. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
}}
}}{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |{{ #if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}{{#if:||Common knowledge}} |. {{ #if: | |http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html }} |. {{ #if: | |http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html }} }}{{ #if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} | {{#ifeq:.|,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{ #if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{ #if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} | }} }} }} }}
}}{{#if:
|. [ Lay summary]{{#if: | – {{{laysource}}}}}
}}{{#if:
| ()
}}{{#if:
|. ""
}}{{#if:||.}}
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
- Trovato! --Christian (discussione) 03:31, 11 mar 2009 (CET)
{{
#if: |
[[ |Hammersley{{
#if: Ben |
, Ben
}}]] |
Hammersley{{
#if: Ben |
, Ben
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; et al.
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
January 30, 2003| }}){{
#if: |
[{{{YearNote}}}]
}} }} |
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
et al.
}}
}}
}}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
January 30, 2003| }})
}} }} }}{{ #if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if:Hammersley |
.
}}{{#if: {{
#if:
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
[{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{
#if:
|
{{#if: | Common knowledge}} | "{{#if: | Common knowledge}}"
}}] |
{{
#if: |
{{#if: | Common knowledge}} | "{{#if: | Common knowledge}}"
}} }} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#ifeq: | |
{{
#if: Hammersley{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
. written at
}} }} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#if: Hammersley |
. {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
in
}}{{
#if:
|
[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
et al.
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
s}}{{#ifeq:.|. | .}}
}} }} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#if: Hammersley |
. }}{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
|
"{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
[{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Common knowledge}}]
|
Common knowledge}}
}}"}} }}{{ #if: |
(in )
}}{{#if:
|
()
}}{{
#if: |{{
#if:{{#if:||Common knowledge}}{{#if:|Common knowledge}}|. }}'{{
#if:
|
.
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: The Guardian |
(: The Guardian) | ()
}} |
{{
#if: The Guardian |
(The Guardian)
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
'{{
#if: |
()
}} |
{{
#if: |
()
}}
}}{{
#if: {{
#if:
|
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
|
: {{
#if: |
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: Hammersley{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
.
}}{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
[{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Common knowledge}}]
|
Common knowledge}}
}}}}{{ #if: |
.
}}{{
#if:
|
. '
}}{{
#if:
|
.
}}{{
#if:
|
( ed.)
}}{{
#if:
|
.
}}{{
#if: The Guardian
|
{{
#if: |
: | .
}} The Guardian }} }}{{ #if: Hammersley |
{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
January 30, 2003| }}
}} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#ifeq: | {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: Hammersley |
. | (published )
}} |
{{
#if: |
. | (published )
}}
}}
}}
}}{{ #if: |
{{
#if: {{
#if:
|
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
|
. {{
#if: |
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
|
. doi:{{#if: | | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y | }}]] }} |
}} }}{{ #if: |
.
}}{{ #if: |
. ISBN
}}{{ #if: |
. ISSN [22]
}}{{ #if: |
. OCLC [23]
}}{{ #if: |
. PMID
}}{{ #if: |
{{#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | . PMC: [24]
}} }}{{ #if: |
. Bibcode: [25]
}}{{ #if: |
. {{{Archive}}} | {{
#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}}
|
.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}} | http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}} the original] | the original
}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{ #if: |
on | . You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: | }}
}} |
. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
}} }}{{ #if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
. {{
#if: |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
}} |
. {{
#if: |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
#if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
#if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
}}
}}
}}
|
,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
#if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
#if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{#if: |
– {{{laysource}}}}}
}}{{#if: |
()
}}{{#if: |
. ""
}}{{#if:||.}}</ref>| |
(Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||||||||||
|
|
«Wikis are also popular because of something known as WikiStyle. For a start, you do not need to know code, HTML, or how to upload files. You just hit Edit and type ordinary text. Links are automatically created when the Wiki sees two capitalised words placed together LikeThis. That phrase, or WikiWord, automatically becomes a link to the page with that WikiWord as its title. If the page doesn't exist, it is created as a blank sheet, and instead of a link, you see a small question mark. Click on the question mark, and you can edit the new page.
Because it allows for very fast creation of hyperlinked ideas, many people install Wikis on their own machines to act as notebooks. You can throw things into them very quickly, and create vast swaths of interlinked research and material without really thinking about it. Writing WikiWords - missing out the spaces - becomes second nature. It's a cool habit you might not want to get into. Read this article online, and you might wish it was editable. You might find yourself with the rest of the Guardian readership, editing and clarifying, annotating and expanding, on each day's issue. First an encyclopaedia; next, perhaps, a newspaper. » |
|
«<ref>{{
#if:Hammersley |
{{
#if: |
[[ |Hammersley{{
#if: Ben |
, Ben
}}]] |
Hammersley{{
#if: Ben |
, Ben
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: |
; | & |; }}
}}{{
#if:
|
[[ |{{
#if: |
,
}}]] |
{{
#if: |
,
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; et al.
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
January 30, 2003| }}){{
#if: |
[{{{YearNote}}}]
}} }} |
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink2}}} |{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink3}}} |{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
et al.
}}
}}
}}, ed{{#if:|s}}{{#ifeq:.|.||.}}{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
January 30, 2003| }})
}} }} }}{{ #if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if:Hammersley |
.
}}{{#if: {{
#if:
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
[{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{
#if:
|
{{#if: | Common knowledge}} | "{{#if: | Common knowledge}}"
}}] |
{{
#if: |
{{#if: | Common knowledge}} | "{{#if: | Common knowledge}}"
}} }} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#ifeq: | |
{{
#if: Hammersley{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
. written at
}} }} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#if: Hammersley |
. {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
in
}}{{
#if:
|
[[{{{Editorlink1}}} |{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname1}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven1}}}
}}}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink2}}}|{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname2}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven2}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
; {{
#if: |
[[{{{Editorlink3}}}|{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}]] |
{{{EditorSurname3}}}{{
#if: |
, {{{EditorGiven3}}}
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
et al.
}}
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
s}}{{#ifeq:.|. | .}}
}} }} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#if: Hammersley |
. }}{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
|
"{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
[{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Common knowledge}}]
|
Common knowledge}}
}}"}} }}{{ #if: |
(in )
}}{{#if:
|
()
}}{{
#if: |{{
#if:{{#if:||Common knowledge}}{{#if:|Common knowledge}}|. }}'{{
#if:
|
.
}}{{
#if:
|
{{
#if: The Guardian |
(: The Guardian) | ()
}} |
{{
#if: The Guardian |
(The Guardian)
}}
}}{{
#if:
|
'{{
#if: |
()
}} |
{{
#if: |
()
}}
}}{{
#if: {{
#if:
|
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
|
: {{
#if: |
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: Hammersley{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
.
}}{{#if: {{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
[{{
#if: {{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}}
|
{{
#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | {{
#if: |
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=
}}
}}
}} {{#if:|Common knowledge}}]
|
Common knowledge}}
}}}}{{ #if: |
.
}}{{
#if:
|
. '
}}{{
#if:
|
.
}}{{
#if:
|
( ed.)
}}{{
#if:
|
.
}}{{
#if: The Guardian
|
{{
#if: |
: | .
}} The Guardian }} }}{{ #if: Hammersley |
{{
#if: {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
January 30, 2003| }}
}} }}{{ #if: |
{{
#ifeq: | {{#if:January 30, 2003|January 30, 2003| }}
|
{{
#if: |
{{
#if: Hammersley |
. | (published )
}} |
{{
#if: |
. | (published )
}}
}}
}}
}}{{ #if: |
{{
#if: {{
#if:
|
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
|
. {{
#if: |
p. {{{page}}} | {{
#if: |
pp. {{{pages}}} |
}}
}}
}}
}}{{
|
. doi:{{#if: | | [[Category:Pages with DOIs broken since {{#time: Y | }}]] }} |
}} }}{{ #if: |
.
}}{{ #if: |
. ISBN
}}{{ #if: |
. ISSN [26]
}}{{ #if: |
. OCLC [27]
}}{{ #if: |
. PMID
}}{{ #if: |
{{#if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html | . PMC: [28]
}} }}{{ #if: |
. Bibcode: [29]
}}{{ #if: |
. {{{Archive}}} | {{
#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}}
|
.|A|a}}rchived from {{#if:{{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}}%7C{{#if: {{#if:|http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}} | http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html}} the original] | the original
}}|the original (unspecified URL)}}{{ #if: |
on | . You must specify the date the archive was made using the Template:Para parameter{{#if: | }}
}} |
. {{#ifeq:.|.|A|a}}rchived on ; no Template:Para specified}}
}} }}{{ #if: http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html |
{{
#if: {{#if:|Common knowledge}}{{#if:||Common knowledge}}
|
. {{
#if: |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
}} |
. {{
#if: |
http://web.archive.org/web/20030618043804/www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884666,00.html
}}
}}{{
#if: {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
#if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
#if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
}}
}}
}}
|
,|, r|. R}}etrieved on {{#if:2007-03-25|2007-03-25|{{
#if:|{{{accessdaymonth}}} |{{
#if:|{{{accessmonthday}}} |
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}{{#if: |
– {{{laysource}}}}}
}}{{#if: |
()
}}{{#if: |
. "" }}{{#if:||.}}</ref>» | |||||||||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:31, 11 mar 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:31, 11 mar 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wikis are also popular because of something known as WikiStyle. For a start, you do not need to know code, HTML, or how to upload files. You just hit Edit and type ordinary text. Links are automatically created when the Wiki sees two capitalised words placed together LikeThis. That phrase, or WikiWord, automatically becomes a link to the page with that WikiWord as its title. If the page doesn't exist, it is created as a blank sheet, and instead of a link, you see a small question mark. Click on the question mark, and you can edit the new page.
Because it allows for very fast creation of hyperlinked ideas, many people install Wikis on their own machines to act as notebooks. You can throw things into them very quickly, and create vast swaths of interlinked research and material without really thinking about it. Writing WikiWords - missing out the spaces - becomes second nature. It's a cool habit you might not want to get into. Read this article online, and you might wish it was editable. You might find yourself with the rest of the Guardian readership, editing and clarifying, annotating and expanding, on each day's issue. First an encyclopaedia; next, perhaps, a newspaper. » | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 03:31, 11 mar 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 03:31, 11 mar 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Interessante riflessione del giornalista, alla fine della citazione. --Christian (discussione) 03:31, 11 mar 2009 (CET)
- Rileggendola, non è poi così rilevante. --93.42.86.167 23:59, 24 apr 2009 (CEST)
Tectonic African open source news, February 7, 2003
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
SearchDay, February 10, 2003
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Nashua (N.H., USA) Telegraph - February 12, 2003 first-person account
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003
BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003
WP anarchica?
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«The operation of Wikipedia is based on the principle of 'anarchy'. The term is being used here in a political sense, and is not derogatory. Each person does exactly what they want. If you see something on the site you don't like, you don't complain to anybody, you just go in there and change it yourself.»
|
|
«<ref>BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«The operation of Wikipedia is based on the principle of 'anarchy'. The term is being used here in a political sense, and is not derogatory. Each person does exactly what they want. If you see something on the site you don't like, you don't complain to anybody, you just go in there and change it yourself.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
compromesso
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Writers are encouraged to adopt a neutral viewpoint. So if, for example, somebody puts in a statement that 'Evolution is a pack of lies' and that the world was created in 4,004 BC by Almighty God, other writers are encouraged to leave this view in the encyclopedia, but to report it as the view of a minority, and to put it alongside alternative views. When all views are in the encyclopedia, people with strong views are less likely to object to the content.»
|
|
«<ref>BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Writers are encouraged to adopt a neutral viewpoint. So if, for example, somebody puts in a statement that 'Evolution is a pack of lies' and that the world was created in 4,004 BC by Almighty God, other writers are encouraged to leave this view in the encyclopedia, but to report it as the view of a minority, and to put it alongside alternative views. When all views are in the encyclopedia, people with strong views are less likely to object to the content.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Forse l'esempio non mi sembra il più azzeccato, ma è un tema da considerare. --Christian (discussione) 00:56, 25 apr 2009 (CEST)
Wikisyntax
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Any term in an article can be marked by a writer as a link, by simply putting square brackets around it like this: term. If there is an article of that name already in the encyclopedia, this automatically produces a link to it, which is displayed in blue. If there is no article of that name, a link is still produced, this time in red. This link points to an input screen where any reader can then write an article on that subject and submit it. Holes in the encyclopedia can thus be quickly identified and filled.
Most of Wikipedia is written in plain text, with a minimum of formatting. Text features, such as bold and italic, can be produced using simple mark-up controls:
|
|
«<ref>BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Any term in an article can be marked by a writer as a link, by simply putting square brackets around it like this: term. If there is an article of that name already in the encyclopedia, this automatically produces a link to it, which is displayed in blue. If there is no article of that name, a link is still produced, this time in red. This link points to an input screen where any reader can then write an article on that subject and submit it. Holes in the encyclopedia can thus be quickly identified and filled.
Most of Wikipedia is written in plain text, with a minimum of formatting. Text features, such as bold and italic, can be produced using simple mark-up controls:
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Immagini
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Pictures can be uploaded to Wikipedia using an on-site form, on condition that they are not copyright. They may be old pictures no longer covered by copyright, or they may be your own work, in which case you donate them to the site. An image can then be displayed within an article. »
|
|
«<ref>BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Pictures can be uploaded to Wikipedia using an on-site form, on condition that they are not copyright. They may be old pictures no longer covered by copyright, or they may be your own work, in which case you donate them to the site. An image can then be displayed within an article. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Affidabilità
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Can I Trust It?
One of the major criticisms levelled against Wikipedia is that it is not possible to trust anything in it, because it could have been put there by someone who doesn't know what they are talking about. Although there are volunteers who check new content, they may not have looked at the article yet, or they may not know enough about the topic to spot errors. Probably the best reply to this particular criticism is that you should be wary of accepting as gospel anything you read on the Internet, even it if is presented by a reputable agency such as the BBC or Encyclopædia Britannica. All encyclopedias have errors and bias in them, so you should always check your facts by reference to other sources. Wikipedia is certainly a good starting-point for finding out information, which you can then check against other sources. But it has to be said that the quality of information in Wikipedia at present is certainly not at the level of, say, Encyclopædia Britannica, where you can be reasonably sure that all the facts, spellings, and grammar have been checked to a high standard. It should also be mentioned that there might be some Wikipedia site content that is not suitable for children. » |
|
«<ref>BBC's h2g2 entry, February 13, 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Can I Trust It?
One of the major criticisms levelled against Wikipedia is that it is not possible to trust anything in it, because it could have been put there by someone who doesn't know what they are talking about. Although there are volunteers who check new content, they may not have looked at the article yet, or they may not know enough about the topic to spot errors. Probably the best reply to this particular criticism is that you should be wary of accepting as gospel anything you read on the Internet, even it if is presented by a reputable agency such as the BBC or Encyclopædia Britannica. All encyclopedias have errors and bias in them, so you should always check your facts by reference to other sources. Wikipedia is certainly a good starting-point for finding out information, which you can then check against other sources. But it has to be said that the quality of information in Wikipedia at present is certainly not at the level of, say, Encyclopædia Britannica, where you can be reasonably sure that all the facts, spellings, and grammar have been checked to a high standard. It should also be mentioned that there might be some Wikipedia site content that is not suitable for children. » | ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Interessante non solo per le frasi, ma anche perché è un'h2g2 altra enciclopedia che ne parla. Tra l'altro anche Wikipedia condivide il principio "Don't panic" e l'idea de The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Quando è stato integrato questo concetto in Wikipedia? E come?--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Dont' Panic
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Don't panic - the most reassuring words you're likely to read all day. There really is no reason to panic, because h2g2 is your guide to Life, the Universe and, well, Everything. We have thousands of entries on all manner of subjects, all written by people like you. If we don't have the one you want, you can even write it yourself.»
|
|
«<ref>h2g2</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Don't panic - the most reassuring words you're likely to read all day. There really is no reason to panic, because h2g2 is your guide to Life, the Universe and, well, Everything. We have thousands of entries on all manner of subjects, all written by people like you. If we don't have the one you want, you can even write it yourself.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 01:19, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Si riferisce a h2g2, ma sembra valga anche per WP. --Christian (discussione) 00:56, 25 apr 2009 (CEST)
Mark Jeays, "Wikipedia - An Online Collaborative Encyclopedia", published in The Canadian Writers Guide, 13th Edition, 2003.
- Niente di particolare. In più, quando l'articolo è pubblicato è ormai vecchio. --Christian (discussione) 01:44, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
This is Local London: It's Common Knowledge February 22, 2003 - incorrectly states that Wikipedia uses CamelCase
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 01:44, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Sunday Herald Sun: Factual free-for-all takes on Britannica (cache) February 23, 2003
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 01:44, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Jack Ganssle, On Language on EE Times Network, 27 March 2003. Ganssle favourably compares Wikipedia with other online reference works.
- Niente di particolare.--Christian (discussione) 02:18, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
BMJ, 26 April 2003
Four futures for scientific and medical publishing letter in April issue of British Medical Journal (BMJ).
- Una lettera pubblicata sul prestigioso British Medical Journal vede nel modello di Wikipedia una valida proposta per la nuova comunicazione in medicina! --Christian (discussione) 02:18, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
EContent Magazine, 23 aprile 2003
"If Two Heads Are Better than One, Try 7,000 with Wikipedia, By Kinley Levack - EContent Magazine, April 2003 Issue, Posted Apr 23, 2003. Incorrectly states that there is no way to email users.
- Innanzitutto il titolo è bellissimo! Poi ci sono spunti per le "Random Page", le "cross-references" e la fondazione. --Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Una pagina a caso
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«The site also includes a "Random Page" function that, not surprisingly, pulls up a random page from anywhere in the encyclopedia. My first foray into this section taught me all about North Hampton, Ohio (in a nutshell, it is a village of approximately 370 in Clark County that is 97.03% white with a median household income of $37,083, and a median family income of $55,341).»
|
|
«{{{3}}}»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«The site also includes a "Random Page" function that, not surprisingly, pulls up a random page from anywhere in the encyclopedia. My first foray into this section taught me all about North Hampton, Ohio (in a nutshell, it is a village of approximately 370 in Clark County that is 97.03% white with a median household income of $37,083, and a median family income of $55,341).»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Ipertesto / links
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«The degree of cross-referencing in the encyclopedia is astounding. Each page comes complete with links to: Edit this page, Discuss this page; Older versions; What links here; and Related changes. There are also myriad links embedded within the text. »
|
|
«{{{3}}}»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«The degree of cross-referencing in the encyclopedia is astounding. Each page comes complete with links to: Edit this page, Discuss this page; Older versions; What links here; and Related changes. There are also myriad links embedded within the text. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
Wikimedia foundation
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«According to Wales, Wikipedia "should carry on indefinitely. We are in the process now of setting up a nonprofit foundation to fund the acquisition of more servers, etc.,[...]»
|
|
«{{{3}}}»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«According to Wales, Wikipedia "should carry on indefinitely. We are in the process now of setting up a nonprofit foundation to fund the acquisition of more servers, etc.,[...]»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 02:32, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 03:22, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
PC Magazine - What's a Wiki?, 9th May 2003 by Sebastian Rupley
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 03:22, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Nashua (N.H., USA) Telegraph - 14 May 2003; bottom half of column talks about personal experience with one Wikipedia entry.
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 03:22, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
New York Times - Business Is Toying With A Web Tool, 19 May 2003 - Wikipedia mentioned and pictured. Article on Socialtext wikis in businesses.
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 12:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Information Outlook June 2003
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 12:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
PC Magazine, June 6, 2003
PC Magazine Site of the Week June 6, 2003
perché funziona?
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«And the typos and awkward constructions we found? As editors, we plan to return to those pages, on the subjects we care about, and tweak them a bit. And that impulse, which Wikipedia is so adept at eliciting, is perhaps precisely the reason the Wikipedia is as good as it is.»
|
|
«<ref>PC Magazine Site of the Week June 6, 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 12:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 12:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«And the typos and awkward constructions we found? As editors, we plan to return to those pages, on the subjects we care about, and tweak them a bit. And that impulse, which Wikipedia is so adept at eliciting, is perhaps precisely the reason the Wikipedia is as good as it is.»
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 12:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 12:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Wikipedia è il "sito della settimana"!
- Riferimento interessante alla voglia di correggere i typo.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TourBusStop
- Molti altri articoli nella rivista: http://www.pcmag.com/search_results/0%2C1208%2C%2C00.asp?qry=Wikipedia&site=3
- --Christian (discussione) 12:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
The Javapedia Project (Java Today), by Ron Goldman. Introduces Javapedia, citing Wikipedia as the inspiration. June 10, 2003
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 15:36, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Gettin' Wiki With It in Sarah's Blog Report (part of The Screen Savers)
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 15:36, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Expertise is key in Wiki world The Advertiser, LA. Jun 30, 2003
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 15:36, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
-
USA Today, July 1, 2003, It's a Wiki world out there for the Web's groupmind
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 15:40, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Website turns tables on government officials, Hiawatha Bray, The Boston Globe, July 4, 2003. About the Government Information Awareness project, mentions Wikipedia in comparison as the "best known wiki site".
- Non rilevante anche se forse si nota sempre più la tendenza a citare Wikipedia come esempio di progetto collaborativo (vedi Javapedia). --Christian (discussione) 15:42, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Edmonton Sun, July 7, 2003, Shakeup coming on Bourbon Street: SITE FOR SORE EYES. Article reads "There's a very good online encyclopedia on the Internet called Wikipedia." Then the article uses wikipedia as a source for "this day in history."
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 15:57, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
National Public Radio, July 21, 2003
National Public Radio, July 21, 2003, Commentary: Wikis. Wikipedia.org, for example, lets the public collaborate to build a surprisingly accurate encyclopedia. Commentator David Weinberger says wikis are one example of "social software," intended to allow people to work together with ease.
- Trasmissione radio carino. Ma non mi sembra di ritrovare niente di interessante. --Christian (discussione) 15:57, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
- Mi ricredo: è pur sempre la National Public Radio! --Christian (discussione) 02:58, 21 feb 2009 (CET)
The Age, July 22, 2003, What a wiki thing to do. Article about wiki's with paragraph about wikipedia.
- Niente di rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 15:57, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Open content and value creation by Magnus Cedergren. Wikipedia cited as an example of Open Content.
- breve saggio interessante. Ma non mi sembra di ritrovare niente di interessante. Wikipedia solo di sfuggita. --Christian (discussione) 15:57, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
CNN, 4 agosto 2003
CNN TechWatch video or Web article, August 4, 2003, CNN International Tech Watch aired a segment on the Wikipedia and the Hong Kong University student project
esperimento di Andrew Lih su Hong Kong
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Wong and Yuen's brush with the Wikis was part of a school assignment on new media.
Professor Andrew Lih set them and 78 other students loose on the site. "I think what happened in the Wikipedia community is they started seeing all these entries about Hong Kong being updated and rapidly edited," Lih told CNN. "And suddenly everyone used to an edit every few minutes or every hour on Wikipedia started seeing this flurry of activity." Student Tony Yeung took a digital camera to Hong Kong's Victoria Peak and published a Wiki entry on the popular tourist lookout. "After that, I found that my careless mistake of my English was corrected!" Yeung says. While Yeung doesn't mind being corrected by complete strangers, the site's free-for-all editing may not sit well with other egos. "It would seem like a recipe of disaster, one of the worst ideas ever thought of," Lih says. But it really does follow the open source model, which is that more eyeballs make all bugs shallow. Meaning: the more people that see it, the more obvious you'll be able to get those bugs or inaccuracies out of it." Over time, Wikis say, a group view or consensus emerges. Wikipedia has welcomed the Hong Kong students with a special page to track their progress. In the Wiki world, the more the merrier. » |
|
«<ref>CNN TechWatch video or Web article, August 4, 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 16:12, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 16:12, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wong and Yuen's brush with the Wikis was part of a school assignment on new media.
Professor Andrew Lih set them and 78 other students loose on the site. "I think what happened in the Wikipedia community is they started seeing all these entries about Hong Kong being updated and rapidly edited," Lih told CNN. "And suddenly everyone used to an edit every few minutes or every hour on Wikipedia started seeing this flurry of activity." Student Tony Yeung took a digital camera to Hong Kong's Victoria Peak and published a Wiki entry on the popular tourist lookout. "After that, I found that my careless mistake of my English was corrected!" Yeung says. While Yeung doesn't mind being corrected by complete strangers, the site's free-for-all editing may not sit well with other egos. "It would seem like a recipe of disaster, one of the worst ideas ever thought of," Lih says. But it really does follow the open source model, which is that more eyeballs make all bugs shallow. Meaning: the more people that see it, the more obvious you'll be able to get those bugs or inaccuracies out of it." Over time, Wikis say, a group view or consensus emerges. Wikipedia has welcomed the Hong Kong students with a special page to track their progress. In the Wiki world, the more the merrier. » | ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 16:12, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 16:12, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- L'articolo è interessante non solo perché è la CNN, ma perché parla non di Wikipedia, ma di qualcosa fatto con Wikipedia (l'attività scolastica). Ma in Italia perché non si fa? O si è fatto?
- Il video non sembra essere più disponibile. Ma è la CNN che parla di Wikipedia!
- --Christian (discussione) 16:12, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Time, 12 agosto 2003
Time Magazine Article entitled The People's Encyclopedia. August 12, 2003
- È solo un trafiletto, ma è il Time che parla. E nel titolo parla di "Enciclopedia della gente".--Christian (discussione) 16:16, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
-
Christian Science Monitor passing reference in article entitled The People's War August 14, 2003
- Non rilevante. Non parla neanche di Wikipedia. --Christian (discussione) 16:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Science, September 5, 2003
Science September 5, 2003.
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Wikipedia offers a substantial science section, with biographies of scientists such as the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, backgrounders on subjects such as relativity and acid-base reactions, and overviews of major disciplines.The articles brim with links to other Wikipedia entries and outside sources. »
|
|
«<ref>Science September 5, 2003.</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 16:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 16:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Wikipedia offers a substantial science section, with biographies of scientists such as the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, backgrounders on subjects such as relativity and acid-base reactions, and overviews of major disciplines.The articles brim with links to other Wikipedia entries and outside sources. »
| ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 16:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 16:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- È Science! A questo punto la legittimazione come enciclopedia è indiscutibile! --Christian (discussione) 16:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Computer Weekly September 2003
- Non più disponibile. Però ho trovato questo link con una lunga lista di potenziali articoli. http://findarticles.com/p/search?qf=all&qt=Wikipedia&sn=0&tag=content;col1
- --Christian (discussione) 16:41, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
-
Encyclopedias a Click Away; Washington Post, Sep. 7, 2003. Brushes off Wikipedia fairly quickly and focuses on CD-ROM encyclopedias.
- Non trovato. --Christian (discussione) 02:56, 21 feb 2009 (CET)
-
PressofAtlanticCity.com. Article entitled Save cash on books, find them free on Net advises using Wikipedia rather than paying for encyclopedias. Positive comments about the current events section. September 14 2003.
- Non trovato. --Christian (discussione) 02:56, 21 feb 2009 (CET)
MIT, October 1 2003
MIT, October 1 2003, Votive Offering: How to Have Your Election Cake and Eat It Too. An article about voting systems in MIT's online newspaper, The Tech ends with the line "An excellent introduction to voting systems and voting reform is www.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Voting_system." Note the typographical error of the inserted space character that prevents you from using the URL directly as presented in the article.
- Appunto come dice la nota sopra in inglese. Wikipedia inizia a diventare una fonte. --Christian (discussione) 16:58, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
-
The "Glassine Surfer" column in the October 2003 issue of The American Philatelist (the main magazine of the American Philatelic Society) has a brief mention of Wikipedia, characterizing its stamp collecting material as "fairly good", and including the URL for Postage Stamp. The column is a monthly feature that mentions various websites of interest to philatelists.
- Non trovato, ma penso che possiamo vivere senza! --Christian (discussione) 17:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
-
ABC 7 Denver Write for an Encyclopedia, October 8. Mirrored by 46 on October 9: [30]
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 17:29, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Wired, October 15 2003
Wired News article entitled "Open Source Everywhere" has a section on Wikipedia. October 15 2003
- Stupendo articolo sull'Open Source. Permette bene di allargare il discorso Wikipedia in un contesto culturale aperto. Forse ho copiato troppo, ma "Melius Abundare Quam Deficiere". --Christian (discussione) 18:40, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
-
"Reference wwworks", Daily Mirror (UK). Names Wikipedia as one of "our top 10 reference sites". October 17, 2003
- Non trovato. --Christian (discussione) 17:41, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Debian Weekly News talks about the article Debian in Wikipedia. 21 October, 2003.
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 17:38, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
MS-Mobiles, 19 November 2003
MS-Mobiles article on the German Wikipedia available in MobiPocket Reader format. 19 November 2003
WP sui cellulari in Germania
| (Testo originale) | (Traduzione) | |||
|
|
«Contrary to USA, there is no flat rate GPRS in EU. That´s why people get innovative and instead of using connection to the Internet to access reference sites - they convert them to eBook format to access them from memory card of their gizmos.
Now encyclopedia about everything is available also for Microsoft smartphone: This encyclopedia is a "Wikipedia" converted to the Mobipocket Reader format.» |
|
«<ref>MS-Mobiles article on the German Wikipedia available in MobiPocket Reader format. 19 November 2003</ref>»
| |
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:38, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:38, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
|
|
«Contrary to USA, there is no flat rate GPRS in EU. That´s why people get innovative and instead of using connection to the Internet to access reference sites - they convert them to eBook format to access them from memory card of their gizmos.
Now encyclopedia about everything is available also for Microsoft smartphone: This encyclopedia is a "Wikipedia" converted to the Mobipocket Reader format.» | ||
| {{#if:--Christian (discussione) 17:38, 20 feb 2009 (CET)| (--Christian (discussione) 17:38, 20 feb 2009 (CET)) }}
}} | ||||
- Dunque WP si sposta dal sito per andare a finire su una scheda. Ancora non si è passati al DVD ROM. Curioso che questo avvenga in Germania dove poi si pubblicherà anche il DVD ROM. --Christian (discussione) 17:38, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Berkeley Daily - Famed Berkeley Home Hosts Kucinich E-campaign - Henry Poole, boardmember of Free Software Foundation talks about Wikipedia, November 28, 2003.
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 17:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Tech Bloom in Full Flower, an editoral by Alex Steffen in the Seattle Post-Intellegencer, mentions Wikipedia as an example. November 20, 2003
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 17:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
Join hands, Asian media urged in The Star, Malaysia mentions Wikipedia as an example of participatory journalism. December 9, 2003
- Non più disponibile. --Christian (discussione) 17:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
"St. Nick not well known", Deseret News, Salt Lake City, Utah. Carrie A. Moore explains the history of Christmas celebrations with the assistance of "Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia". December 20, 2003
- Non rilevante. --Christian (discussione) 17:49, 20 feb 2009 (CET)
